Social Ties and User Content Generation: Evidence from Flickr

References

• Abrams D. Social identity on a national scale: Optimal distinctiveness and young people's self-expression through musical preference. Group Processes Intergroup Relations (2009) 12(3):303–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal A. Tech journal: The new YouTube is here! Wall Street Journal Online (2011) December 8). http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/12/08/tech-journal-the-new-youtube-is-here/Google Scholar
• Ames M, Naaman M, Begole B, Payne S, Churchill E, Amant RS, Gilmore D, Rosson MB. Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2007) (ACM, New York) 971–980Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. (2011a) 57(9):1623–1639Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D. Identifying social influence in networks using randomized experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2011b) 28(5):91–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D. Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science (2012) 337(6092):337–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2009) 106(51):21544–21549Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bampo M, Ewing MT, Mather DR, Stewart D, Wallace M. The effects of the social structure of digital networks on viral marketing performance. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(3):273–290Link, Google Scholar
• Bateman PJ, Gray PH, Butler BS. The impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. (2011) 22(4):841–854Link, Google Scholar
• Bemmaor AC, Laurent G, Lilien GL, Pras B. Modeling the diffusion of new durable goods: Word-of-mouth effect versus consumer heterogeneity. Research Traditions Marketing (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 201–213Google Scholar
• Berger J. Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psych. Sci. (2011) 22(7):891–893Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Heath C. Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(2):121–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Heath C. Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2008) 95(3):593–607Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Milkman KL. What makes online content viral? J. Marketing Res. (2012) 49(2):192–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM. Presidential address: Parameters of social structure. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1974) 39(5):615–635Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1991) 17(5):475–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler BS. Membership size, communication activity, sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):346–362Link, Google Scholar
• Capocci A, Baldassarri A, Servedio VDP, Loreto V. Friendship, collaboration and semantics in Flickr: From social interaction to semantic similarity. Proc. International Workshop Modeling Social Media (2010) (ACM, New York) 1–4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattuto C, Benz D, Hotho A, Stumme G, Sheth A, Staab S, Dean M, Paolucci M, Maynard D, Finin T, Thirunarayan K. Semantic grounding of tag relatedness in social bookmarking systems. International Semantic Web Conf., Vol. 5318 (2008) (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg) 615–631Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossref, Google Scholar
• Cha M, Mislove A, Gummadi KP, Quemada J, Leon G, Maarek YS, Nejdl W. A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the Flickr social network. Proc. 18th Internat. WWW Conf. (2009) (ACM, New York) 721–730Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan L. Social Media Marketing for Digital Photographers (2011) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cheema A, Kaikati AM. The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(3):553–563Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheliotis G. From open source to open content: Organization, licensing and decision processes in open cultural production. Decision Support Systems (2009) 47(3):229–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Li SX. Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on MovieLens. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2010) 100(4):1358–1398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cosley D, Frankowski D, Kiesler S, Terveen L, Riedl J, Veer G, Gale C. How oversight improves member-maintained communities. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2005) (ACM, New York) 11–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crandall D, Cosley D, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Suri S, Li Y, Liu B, Sarawagi S. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (2008) (ACM, New York) 160–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Gao G(G), Narayan R. Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? J. Management Inform. Systems (2010) 27(2):127–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston: The creation of an organizational base for high culture in America. Media, Culture Soc. (1982) 4(1):33–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Han SP. An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior on the mobile Internet. Management Sci. (2011) 57(9):1671–1691Link, Google Scholar
• Gnyawali DR, Fan W, Penner J. Competitive actions and dynamics in the digital age: An empirical investigation of social networking firms. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(3):594–613Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econom Perspectives (2005) 19(1):33–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Manchanda P, Nair H, Bothner M, Dodds P, Godes D, Hosanagar K, Tucker C. Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3–4):287–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes D, Coulson G, Walkerdine J. Free riding on Gnutella revisited: The bell tolls? IEEE Distributed Systems Online (2005) 6(6):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horizons (2010) 53(1):59–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh J, Kim Y-G, Butler B, Bock G-W. Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Comm. ACM (2007) 50(2):69–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardelli GJ, Pickett CL, Brewer MB. Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2010) 43:63–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Kaufman J, Gonzalez M, Wimmer A, Christakis N. Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network data set using Facebook.com. Soc. Networks (2008) 30(4):330–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ling K, Beenen G, Ludford P, Wang X, Chang K, Li X, Cosley D, et al. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. J. Computer-Mediated Comm. (2005) 10(4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu H. Social network profiles as taste performances. J. Computer-Mediated Comm. (2007) 13(1):252–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ludford PJ, Cosley D, Frankowski D, Terveen L, Dykstra-Erickson E, Tscheligi M. Think different: increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarity. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2004) (ACM, New York) 631–638Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn M, Harris J. The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psych. Marketing (1997) 14(6):601–616Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn M, Harris J. Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2006) 27(21):1861–1883Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macskassy SA, Michelson M. Why do people retweet? Anti-homophily wins the day! Proc. 5th Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (2011) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) 209–216Google Scholar
• Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schütze H. Introduction to Information Retrieval (2009) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Manski CF. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mark NP. Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 68(3):319–345Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27(1):415–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller AD, Edwards WK, Rosson MB, Gilmore DJ. Give and take: A study of consumer photo-sharing culture and practice. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2007) (ACM, New York) 347–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon JY, Sproull LS. The role of feedback in managing the Internet-based volunteer work force. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(4):494–515Link, Google Scholar
• Nair H, Manchanda P, Bhatia T. Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(5):883–895Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nov O, Ye C. Why do people tag? Motivations for photo tagging. Comm. ACM (2010) 53(7):128–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(2):681–704Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schau HJ, Gilly MC. We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal Web space. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(3):385–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schifanella R, Barrat A, Cattuto C, Markines B, Menczer F, Davison BD, Suel T, Craswell N, Liu B. Folks in folksonomies: Social link prediction from shared metadata. Proc. 3rd ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (2010) (ACM, New York) 271–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalizi CR, Thomas AC. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. (2011) 40(2):211–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheldon KM, Abad N, Hinsch C. A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2011) 100(4):766–775Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB. Statistical models for social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (2011) 37(1):131–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder CR, Fromkin HL. Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference (1980) (Plenum, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen A. Social learning and health plan choice. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(4):1–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Susarla A, Oh J-H, Tan Y. Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inform. Systems Res. (2012) 23(1):23–41Link, Google Scholar
• Tian KT, Bearden WO, Hunter GL. Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(1):50–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Bodapati AV, Bucklin RE. Determining influential users in Internet social networks. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(4):643–658Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C. Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. (2008) 54(12):2024–2038Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL. Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Am. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(5):1409–1435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van House NA, Rosson MB, Gilmore DJ. Flickr and public image-sharing: Distant closeness and photo exhibition. Proc. CHI EA'07 (2007) Association for Computing Machinery, New York(ACM, New York) 2717–2722Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Zwol R, Murdock V, Pueyo LG, Ramirez G. Diversifying image search with user generated content. Proc. 1st ACM Internat. Conf. Multimedia Inform. Retrieval (2008) (ACM, New York) 67–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan YC, Cosley D, Welser HT, Xia L, Gay G. The diffusion of a task recommendation system to facilitate contributions to an online community. J. Computer-Mediated Comm. (2009) 15(1):32–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Sarvary M. Social media competition: Differentiation with user-generated content. (2011) . Working paper. Available at: http://128.122.130.4/cons/groups/content/documents/webas-set/con_032240.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Zhang X(M), Zhu F. Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(4):1601–1615Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Zubcsek PP. Community Leaders or Entertainment Workers? Incentivizing Content Generation in Social Media. (2010) . INSEAD working paper. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1856442Google Scholar