Social Network Effects on Productivity and Job Security: Evidence from the Adoption of a Social Networking Tool

References

• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):321–341Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Pischke J. Mostly Harmless Econometrics (2009) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M. The diversity-bandwidth tradeoff. Amer. J. Sociol. (2011) 117(1, July):90–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne M. Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Inform. Systems Res. (2012) 23(3, Part-2):849–867Link, Google Scholar
• Bales RF, Slater P, Parsons T, Bales RF. Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. Family, Socialization and Interaction Process (1955) (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) . Chapter VGoogle Scholar
• Blei D, Ng A, Jordan M. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. (2003) 3(January):993–1022Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Foster P. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management (2003) 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
• Burt R. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R, Staw B, Sutton R. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior (2000) 22(JAI Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):110–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. Information and structural holes: Comment on Reagans and Zuckerman. Indust. Corporate Change (2008) 17(5):953–969Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R, Ronchi D. Teaching executives to see social capital: Results from a field experiment. Soc. Sci. Res. (2007) 36(3):1156–1183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Cummings J. Tie and network correlates of performance in knowledge intensive work. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):928–937Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etzioni A. Dual leadership in complex organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1965) 30(5):688–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RB. Structural bases of leadership in intraorganizational networks. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1991) 54(1):36–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun CJ. Strategies for network research in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1982) 7(2):280–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedkin N. Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Soc. Networks (1982) 3(1982):273–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G, Gigerenzer G, Todd PM. The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (1999) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G. Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psych. Rev. (2002) 109:75–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M, Marsden PV, Lin N. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Social Structure and Network Analysis (1982) 1:201–233Google Scholar
• Hansen C, Hausman J, Newey W. Many Weak Instruments and Microeconometric Practice. (2005) July). MimeoGoogle Scholar
• Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton R. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC. The Human Group, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms (1974) (Harcourt, Brace and World, New York) Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(3):673–703Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kossinets G, Watts D. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science (2006) 311(5757):88–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. Entrepreneurial opportunities in an entrepreneurial firm: A structural approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (1995) 19(3):53–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Kilduff M. Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 76(5):770–782Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Porter L. When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayer's attitudes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30(2):242–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumbasar E, Romney AK, Batchelder WH. Systematic biases in social perception. Am. J. Sociology (1994) 100(2):477–505Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Ehrlich K, Griffiths-Fisher V, Desforges C. SmallBlue: People mining for expertise search. IEEE MultiMedia at Work (2008) 15(1):78–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (2001) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln JR, Miller J. Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24(2):181–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P. Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1990) 16:435–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden P, Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S. Recent developments in network measurement. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munshi K. Networks in the modern economy: Mexican migrants in the U.S. labor market. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(2):549–599Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piskorski M, Eisenmann T, Chen D, Feinstein D. Facebook. (2011) . Harvard Business School Case 808128, Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Podolny J. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(1):33–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J, Baron J. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1997) 62(5):673–693Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W, Koput K, White D, Smith O. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 110(4):1132–1205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517Link, Google Scholar
• Rodan S, Galunic D. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:541–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah PP. Network destruction: The structural implications of downsizing. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(1):101–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slater PE. Role differentiation in small groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1965) 20(3):300–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders T. Prologue to the measurement of social capital. The Tocqueville Rev. (1999) 10(1):27–44Google Scholar
• Wen Z, Lin CY. Towards finding valuable topics. SIAM Internat. Conf. Data Mining (2010) (SIAM, Philadelphia) 720–731Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu F, Huberman B, Adamic L, Tyler J. Information flow in social groups. Physica A (2004) 337(1):327–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Lin C, Aral S, Brynjolfsson E. Network structure and information worker productivity: New evidence from the global consulting services industry. Winter Conf. Bus. Intelligence (2009) (University of Utah, Salt Lake City) Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Bell G. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(9):809–825Crossref, Google Scholar