Research Commentary—Information in Digital, Economic, and Social Networks

References

• Agarwal R, Gupta AK, Kraut R (2008) Editorial overview: The interplay between digital and social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):243–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahmed N, Neville J, Kompella R (2010) Reconsidering the foundations of network sampling. Proc. 2nd Workshop Inform. Networks.Google Scholar
• Ahmed N, Neville J, Kompella R (2012) Network sampling designs for relational classification. Proc. 6th Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs and Soc. Media.Google Scholar
• Ahuja MK, Carley KM (1998) Network structure and virtual organizations. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 3(4):741–757.Google Scholar
• Angst CM, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V, Kelley K (2011) Propensity, susceptibility, infectiousness, and proximity: Predicting organizational diffusion of electronic medical records. Management Sci. 57(1):1077–1093.Google Scholar
• Aral S (2011) Identifying social influence: A comment on opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):217–223.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, David V (2012) The anatomy and dynamics of vision advantages. Proc. 33rd Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Orlando, FL.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Taylor S (2011) Viral incentive systems: A randomized field experiment. Workshop Inform. Systems Econom. (WISE), Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth tradeoff. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011a) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011b) Identifying social influence in networks using randomized experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems 26(5):91–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2012) Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337(6092):337–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne M (2007) Productivity effects of information diffusion in networks. Proc. 28th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Montreal.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne M (2008) Sharing mental models: Antecedents and consequences of mutual knowledge in teams. Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1299260.Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne M (2012) Information, technology and information worker productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):849–867.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence based contagion from homophily driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2013) Engineering social contagion: Optimal network seeding and incentive strategies. Network Sci. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aronow PM, Samii C (2012) Estimating average causal effects under general interference. Working paper, New York University.Google Scholar
• Arriaga M, Levina N (2008) Social dynamics in online cultural fields. ICIS 2008 Proc., Paper 120. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/120.Google Scholar
• Baker WE (1984) The social structure of a national securities market. Amer. J. Sociol. 89(4):775–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala V, Goyal S (2003) A noncooperative model of network formation. Econometrica 68(50):1181–1229.Google Scholar
• Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baskerville R, Lyytinen K, Sambamurthy V, Straub D (2011) A response to the design oriented information systems research memorandum. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 20(1):11–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani SD, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashions, custom and cultural change as information cascades. J. Political. Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilgic M, Getoor L (2008) Effective label acquisition for collective classification. Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 43–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bramoulle Y, Kranton R (2007) Public goods in networks. J. Econom. Theory 127(1):478–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bramoulle Y, Djebbari H, Fortin B (2009) Identification of peer effects through social networks. J. Econometrics 150(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiger RL (1974) The duality of persons and groups. Soc. Forces 53(2):181–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkhardt ME, Brass DJ (1990) Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):104–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R (2008) Information and structural holes: Comment on Reagans and Zuckerman. Ind. Corp. Change 17(5):953–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton R (1638) The Anatomy of Melancholy, 1927 ed. (Farrar and Rinehart, New York).Google Scholar
• Butts C (2008) A relational event framework for social action. Sociol. Methodology 38(1):155–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K (1997) Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 18(S1):533–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlsson SA, El Sawy OA, Eriksson RAI (1996) Gaining competitive advantage through shared knowledge creation: In search of a new design theory for strategic information systems. ECIS 1996 Proc.Google Scholar
• Carmi E, Oestreicher-Singer G, Sundararajan A (2009) Spreading the Oprah effect: The diffusion of demand shocks in a recommendation network. Proc. INFORMS Conf. Inform. Systems Tech. (CIST 2009).Google Scholar
• Centola D, Macy M (2007) Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(3):702–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chidambaram L, Jones B (1993) Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quart. 17(4):465–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England J. Medicine 357(4):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clauset A, Eagle N (2007) Persistence and periodicity in a dynamic proximity network. DIMACS Workshop on Computational Methods for Dynamic Interaction Networks. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
• Clauset A, Moore C, Newman M (2008) Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature 453(7191):98–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clauset A, Newman M, Moore C (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E 70(6):066111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement):S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Pregibon D, Volinsky C (2002) Communities of interest. Intell. Data Anal. 6(3):211–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Cummings JN (2004) Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad. Management J. 47(6):928–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Sproull L (2004) More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. 15(4):446–462.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta K, Singh R, Viswanathan B, Chakraborty D, Mukherjea S, Nanavati A, Joshi A (2008) Social ties and their relevance to churn in mobile telecom networks. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Extending Database Tech.: Adv. Database Tech (ACM, New York), 668–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2006) Strategic manipulation of Internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms. Management Sci. 52(10):1577–1593.Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Katona Z, Rand W (2010) Media, aggregators and the link economy. Working paper No. 10-13, NET Institute.Google Scholar
• Dezso Z, Barabasi A-L (2002) Halting viruses in scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. E 65(5):1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar V, Hseih J, Sundararajan A (2011) Comments on Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: A Proposed Framework for Businesses and Policymakers. (Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC), Available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/privacyreportframework/00458-57993.pdf.Google Scholar
• Dhar V, Geva T, Oestreicher-Singer G, Sundararajan A (2012) The gestalt in graphs: Prediction using economic networks. Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business.Google Scholar
• Diesner J, Carley K (2005) Revealing social structure from texts: Meta-matrix analysis as a novel method for network text analysis. Narayanan VK, Armstrong DJ, eds. Causal Mapping for Research in Information Technology (IGI Publishing, Hershey, PA), 81–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domingos P, Richardson M (2001) Mining the network value of customers. Proc. Seventh ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 57–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doreian P, Stokman FN (1997) Evolution of Social Networks (Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Glennerster R, Kremer M (2006) Using randomization in development economics research: A toolkit. Schultz TP, Strauss JA, eds. Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 3895–3962.Google Scholar
• Dunbar RIM (1992) Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. J. Human Evolution 22(6):469–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Johnson SL (2011) Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1464–1480.Link, Google Scholar
• Fawcett T, Provost F (1997) Adaptive fraud detection. Dat. Min. Knowl. Disc. 3(3):291–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman N, Getoor L, Koller D, Pfeffer A (1999) Learning probabilistic relational models. Proc. 1999 Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 1300–1309.Google Scholar
• Galeotti A, Goyal S (2009) Influencing the influencers: A theory of strategic diffusion. RAND J. Econom. 40(3):509–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galeotti A, Goyal S, Jackson MO, Vega-Redondo F (2010) Network games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(1):218–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallagher B, Tong H, Eliassi-Rad T, Faloutsos C (2008) Using ghost edges for classification in sparsely labeled networks. Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, 256–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Getoor L, Friedman N, Koller D, Taskar B (2003) Learning probabilistic models of link structure. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3:679–707.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Han S-P (2011) An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior on the mobile Internet. Management Sci. 57(9):1671–1691.Link, Google Scholar
• Girvan M, Newman M (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(12):7821–7826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Oestreicher-Singer G, Reichman S (2012) The quest for content: How user-generated links can facilitate online exploration. J. Marketing Res. 49(4):52–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Lilien GL, Mallapragada G (2006) Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Sci. 52(7):1043–1056.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahn J, Moon JY, Zhang C (2008) Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):369–391.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen M (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckerman D, Chickering DM, Meek C, Rounthwaite R, Kadie C (2001) Dependency networks for inference, collaborative filtering, and data visualization. J. Machine Learn. Res. 1:49–75.Google Scholar
• Henderson K, Gallagher B, Li L, Akoglu L, Eliassi-Rad T, Tong H, Faloutsos C (2011) It's who you know: Graph mining using recursive structural features. Proc. 17th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, 663–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28(1):75–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill S, Provost F, Volinsky C (2006) Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statist. Sci. 21(2):256–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill S, Provost F, Volinsky C (2007) Learning and inference in massive social networks. 5th Internat. Workshop Mining Learning with Graphs, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
• Hill S, Agarwal DK, Bell R, Volinsky C (2006) Building an effective representation for dynamic networks. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 15(3):584–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinz O, Spann M (2008) The impact of information diffusion on bidding behavior in secret reserve price auctions. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):351–368.Link, Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC, Tsang EWK (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):146–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO (2008) Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO, Yariv L (2005) Diffusion on social networks. Économie Publique 16(1):3–16.Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Laursen K (2009) The role of lead users in knowledge sharing. Res. Policy. 38(10):1582–1589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahanda I, Neville J (2009) Using transactional information to predict link strength in online social networks. Proc. 4th Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media. Assoc. Advancement Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Alavi M (2008) Casting the net: A multimodal network perspective on user-system interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):253–272.Link, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, Mobius M, Rosenblat T, Szeidl A (2009) Trust and social collateral. Quart. J. Econom. 124(3):1307–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Sarvary M (2008) Network formation and the structure of the commercial World Wide Web. Marketing Sci. 27(5):764–778.Link, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Zubcsek PP, Sarvary M (2011) Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):425–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz L (1953) A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika 18(1):39–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos E (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. 9th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J (1999) Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Proc. Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (ACM, New York), 668–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kossinets G, Watts D (2006) Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science 311(5757):88–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuk G (2006) Strategic Interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Management Sci. 52(7):1031–1042.Link, Google Scholar
• La Fond T, Neville J (2010) Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects. Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC, 601–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabasi AL, Brewer D, Christakis N, et al.. (2009) Computational social science. Science 323(5915):721–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leenders R, Engelen J, Kratzer J (2003) Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 20(1–2):69–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leskovec J, Kleinberg J, Faloutsos C (2005) Graphs over time: Densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. Proc. Eleventh ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liben-Nowell D, Kleinberg J (2007) The link-prediction problem for social networks. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 58(7):1019–1031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–45.Link, Google Scholar
• López-Pintado D (2008) Diffusion in complex social networks. Games Econom. Behav. 62(2):573–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Kinshuk J, Singh PV (2013) The emergence of opinion leaders in a networked online community: A dyadic model with time dynamics and a heuristic for fast estimation. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Ma M, Agarwal R (2007) Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 18(1):42–67.Link, Google Scholar
• Macskassy S (2009) Using graph-based metrics with empirical risk minimization to speed up active learning on networked data. Proc. 15th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 597–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macskassy SA, Provost F (2005) Suspicion scoring based on guilt-by-association, collective inference, and focused data access. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.79.4577&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
• Macskassy S, Provost F (2007) Classification in networked data: A toolkit and a univariate case study. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 8:935–983.Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N (2008) The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. 27(6):961–976.Link, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martens D, Provost F (2011) Pseudo-social network targeting from consumer transaction data. NYU Working Paper CEDER-11-05, 2011. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1934670.Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D (2006) Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Sci. 25(2):155–976.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D, Yoganarasimhan H (2011) Link to success: How blogs build an audience by promoting rivals. Marketing Sci. 30(2):224–229.Google Scholar
• McCallum A, Wang X, Corrada-Emmanuel A (2007) Topic and role discovery in social networks with experiments on Enron and academic email. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 30(1):249–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melville P, Subbian K, Perlich C, Lawrence R, Meliksetian E (2010) A predictive perspective on measures of influence in networks. 2010 Workshop Inform. Networks (WIN 2010).Google Scholar
• Miller AR, Tucker C (2009) Privacy protection and technology diffusion: The case of electronic medical records. Management Sci. 55(7):1077–1093.Link, Google Scholar
• Muller E, Peres R, Mahajan V (2009) Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth. MSI Working Series. (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Munshi K (2003) Networks in the modern economy: Mexican migrants in the US labor market. Q. J. Econom. 18(2):549–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nam S, Manchanda P, Chintagunta PK (2010) The effect of signal quality and contiguous word of mouth on customer acquisition for a video-on-demand service. Marketing Sci. 29(4):1–11.Link, Google Scholar
• Narayanan A, Shmatikov V (2009) De-anonymizing social networks. Proc. 2009 30th IEEE Sympos. Security Privacy (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 173–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neville J, Jensen D (2005) Leveraging relational autocorrelation with latent group models. Fifth IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 322–329.Google Scholar
• Neville J, Jensen D (2007) Relational dependency networks. J. Machine Learn. Res. 8:653–692.Google Scholar
• Neville J, Şimşek O, Jensen D, Komoroske J, Palmer K, Goldberg H (2005) Using relational knowledge discovery to prevent securities fraud. Proc. Eleventh ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 449–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2):167–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ, Forrest S, Balthrop J (2002) Email networks and the spread of computer viruses. Phys. Rev. E 66(3):1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama OK, Lee AS (1997) Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quart. 21(2):145–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G, Sundararajan A (2012a) The visible hand? Demand effects of recommendation networks in electronic markets. Management Sci. 58(11):1963–1981.Link, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G, Sundararajan A (2012b) Recommendation networks and the long tail of electronic commerce. MIS Quart. 36(1):65–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G, Zalmanson L (2013) Content or community? A digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh J, A. Susarla, Tan Y (2012) Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):23–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen H, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2010) Social networks and information systems: Ongoing and future research streams. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11:61–68.Google Scholar
• Oktay H, Taylor BJ, Jensen D (2010) Causal discovery in social media using quasi-experimental designs. 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics (SOMA '10), Washington, DC.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski JA, Yates J (1994) Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(4):541–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T (1998) The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. (Stanford Infolab, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Palla G, Barabási A-L, Vicsek T (2007) Quantifying social group evolution. Nature 446(7136):664–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001) Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(14):3200–3203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer J III, Neville J, Bennettt P (2012) Active sampling of networks. Proc. 10th Workshop Mining Learn. Graphs, ICML.Google Scholar
• Podolny J (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Am. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Provost F (2011) Geo-social targeting for privacy-friendly mobile advertising: Position paper. NYU Working Paper CEDER-11-06a, 2011, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1946695.Google Scholar
• Provost F, Dalessandro B, Hook R, Zhang X, Murray A (2009) Audience selection for on-line brand advertising: Privacy-friendly social network targeting. Proc. 15th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 707–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rattigan M, Maier M, Jensen D (2007) Exploiting network structure for active inference in collective classification. Proc. Seventh IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining Workshops (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 429–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravindran K, Susarla A, Gurbaxani V (2009) Social networks and contract enforcement in IT outsourcing. Proc. 30th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Kraut RE, Kiesler S (2007) Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organ. Stud. 28(3):377–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhue L, Sundararajan A (2013) Digital access, political networks and the diffusion of democracy. Soc. Networks, ePub ahead of print February 13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.06.007. Google Scholar
• Rhue L, Sundararajan A (2012) Digital social visibility: How Facebook gifts change our choices. Wired. Accessed February 15, 2013, http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/12/digital-social-visibility-how-facebook-gifts-change-our-choices/.Google Scholar
• Richter Y, Yom-Tov E, Slonim N (2010) Predicting customer churn in mobile networks through analysis of social groups. Proc. 2010 SIAM Internat. Conf. Data Mining (SDM 2010).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts J (2000) From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer. Technology Anal. Strategic Management 12(4):429–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins G, Pattison P, Woolcock J (2005) Small and other worlds: Global network structures from local processes. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):894–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodan S, Galunic D (2004) More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. 25(6):541–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scellato S, Musolesi M, Mascolo C, Latora V (2010) On nonstationarity of human contact networks. Proc. 2nd Annual Workshop Simplifying Complex Networks Practitioners (SIMPLEX 2010). Genoa, Italy.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen P, Namata G, Bilgic M, Getoor L, Gallagher B, Eliassi-Rad T (2008) Collective classification in network data. AI Magazine 29(3):93–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Rui H, Whinston A (2011) Information sharing in social broadcast: Evidences from Twitter. Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
• Singh PV (2010) The small world effect: The influence of macro level properties of developer collaboration networks on open source project success. ACM T. Soft. Eng. Meth. 20(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Tan Y, Mookerjee V (2008) Network effects: The influence of structural social capital on open source success. MIS Quart. 35(4):813–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders T, Steglich C, Schweinberger M (2006) Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. Montfort KV, Oud J, Satorra A, eds. Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 41–71.Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Toubia O (2010) Deriving value from social commerce networks. J. Marketing Res. 47(2):215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2006) Network seeding. 18th Workshop Inform. Systems Economic.Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2007) Local network effects and complex network structure. B.E. J. Theoret. Econom. 7(1).Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2012) Deconstructing social influence in networks: On the need for models over measurement. Working paper, New York University.Google Scholar
• Sykes TA, Viswanath V, Sanjay G (2009) Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand employees' system use. MIS Quart. 33(2):371–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt L (2010) Job hopping, information technology spillovers, and productivity growth. Working paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1302637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taskar B, Abbeel P, Koller D (2002) Discriminative probabilistic models for relational data. Proc. 18th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
• Trier M (2008) Towards dynamic visualization for understanding evolution of digital communication networks. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):335–350.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. 44(5):996–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2008) Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. 54(12):2024–2038.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL (2001) Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1409–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang P, Gonzales M, Hidalgo C, Barabasi A-L (2009) Understanding the spreading patterns of mobile phone viruses. Science 324(5930):1071–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang T, Neville J, Gallagher B, Eliassi-Rad T (2011) Correcting bias in statistical tests for network classifier evaluation. Proc. 21st Eur. Conf. Machine Learn.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilhite A (2001) Bilateral trade and small world networks. Comput. Econom. 18(1):49–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Waber B, Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Pentland S (2008) Mining face to face interaction networks using sociometric badges: Evidence predicting productivity in IT configuration Proc. 29th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Paris, France.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu F, Huberman B, Adamic L, Tyler J (2004) Information flow in social groups. Physica A 337(1–2):327–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiang R, Neville J (2008) Pseudolikelihood EM for within-network relational learning. Proc. 8th IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiang R, Neville J (2011a) Relational learning with one network: An asymptotic analysis. Proc. 14th Internat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence Statist. (AISTAT).Google Scholar
• Xiang R, Neville J (2011b) Understanding propagation error and its effect on collective classification. Proc. 11th IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiang R, Neville J, Rogati M (2010) Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. Proc. NIPS Workshop Analyzing Networks Learn. Graphs (ACM, New York), 981–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang J, Counts S (2010) Predicting the speed, scale and range of information diffusion in Twitter. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Yates J, Orlikowski WJ (1992) Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Acad. Management Rev. 17(2):299–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou B, Pei J, Luk W-S (2008) A brief survey on anonymization techniques for privacy preserving publishing of social network data. Explorations 10(2):12–22.Crossref, Google Scholar