Research Note—A View from the Top: Integrated Information Delivery and Effective Information Use from the Senior Executive's Perspective

References

• Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4):665–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Applegate L, Austin R, McFarlan F (2007) Corporate Information Strategy and Management (McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York).Google Scholar
• Armstrong CP, Sambamurthy V (1999) Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inform. Systems Res. 10(4):304–327.Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos JY, Treacy ME (1986) Information technology and corporate strategy: A research perspective. MIS Quart. 10(2):107–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Bardhan IR, Lin S, Chang H (2006) Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities and plant performance. MIS Quart. 30(2):315–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E, Rosenzweig ED, Stratman JK (2009) The efficient use of enterprise information for strategic advantage: A data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Management 27(4):310–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein PA, Haas LM (2008) Information integration in the enterprise. Comm. ACM 51(9):72–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beynon-Davies P (2010) The enactment of significance: A unified conception of information, systems and technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 19(4):389–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland R (1987) The in-formation of information systems. Lyytinen K, Boland R, Hirschheim R, eds. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 363–394.Google Scholar
• Bremer M, Cohnitz D (2005) Information and Information Flow (Ontos Verlag, Lancaster, UK).Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quart. 31(4):657–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Grange MJ (2013) From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):632–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Grewal R, Sambamurthy V (2002) Shaping up for e-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies. MIS Quart. 26(2):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Checkland P, Howell S (2006) Data, capta, information and knowledge. Hinton M, ed. Introducing Information Management: The Business Approach (Elsevier, Burlington, MA), 47–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. 22(1):vii–xvi.Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Overdorf M (2000) Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(2):67–75.Google Scholar
• Cohen P (1990) Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Appl. Psych. Measurement 14(2):183–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Weick KE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretive systems. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):284–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Beers MC (1995) Managing information about processes. J. Management Inform. Systems 12(1):57–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewett T, Jones GR (2001) The role of information technology in the organization: A review, model, and assessment. J. Management 27(3):313–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman RG (2001) The role of aggregation in the measurement of IT-related organizational innovation. MIS Quart. 25(4):427–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Floridi L (2005) Is information meaningful data? Philos. Phenomenological Res. 70(2):351–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Rigdon EE, Straub D (2011) An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quart. 35(2):iii–xiv.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giachetti RE (2004) A framework to review the information integration of the enterprise. Internat. J. Production Res. 42(6):1147–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glazer R (1991) Marketing in an information-intensive environment: Strategic implications of knowledge as an asset. J. Marketing 55(4):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glazer R (1993) Measuring the value of information: The information-intensive organization. IBM Systems J. 32(1):99–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granados N, Gupta A (2013) Transparency strategy: Competing with information in a digital world. MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Tatham AR, Black W (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: An update. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):334–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heijnen P, Lukszo Z (2006) Continuous improvement of batch wise operation—A decision support framework. Production Planning and Control 17(4):355–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill T, Lewicki P (2005) Statistics: Methods and Applications (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK).Google Scholar
• Iacovou CL, Benbasat I, Dexter AS (1995) Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quart. 19(4):465–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IBM Global Business Services (2010) Capitalizing on complexity: Insights from the Global Chief Executive Officer Study. Report, IBM, Somers, NY.Google Scholar
• Kelly S, Holland C, Light B (1999) Enterprise resource planning: A business approach to systems development. Proc. 5th Amer. Conf. Inform. Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (August 13–15) (AIS Electronic Library), 785–787.Google Scholar
• Kettinger WJ, Li Y (2010) The infological equation extended: Towards conceptual clarity in the relationship between data, information and knowledge. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 19(4):409–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kettinger WJ, Marchand DA (2011) Information management practices (IMP) from the senior manager's perspective: An investigation of the IMP construct and its measurement. Inform. Systems J. 21(5):385–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein R, Rai A (2009) Interfirm strategic information flows in logistics supply chain relationships. MIS Quart. 33(4):735–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Grover V (2008) Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(2):23–39.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3–90.Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Palvia P (2001) Key data management issues in global executive information systems. Indust. Management Data Systems 101(3/4):153–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quart. 31(1):59–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchand DA, Kettinger WJ, Rollins JD (2000) Information orientation: People, technology and the bottom line. Sloan Management Rev. 41(4):69–80.Google Scholar
• Marchand DA, Kettinger WJ, Rollins JD (2002) Information Orientation: The Link to Business Performance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Axline S, Petrie D, Tanis C (2000) Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP—Successes and problems. J. Inform. Tech. 15(4):245–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massetti B, Zmud RW (1996) Measuring the extent of EDI usage in complex organizations: Strategies and illustrative examples. MIS Quart. 20(3):331–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKeen JD, Smith HA (2007) Information management: The nexus of business and IT. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(3):35–46.Google Scholar
• McKinney EH, Yoos CJ (2010) Information about information: A taxonomy of views. MIS Quart. 34(2):329–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. 28(2):283–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer AD, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 41–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1987) The genesis of configuration. Acad. Management Rev. 12(4):686–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Krishnan MS, Fornell C (2005) Why do customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction? J. Marketing 69(4):201–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Ramasubbu N, Sambamurthy V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quart. 35(1):237–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3):192–222.Link, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay T, Kekre S (2002) Strategic and operational benefits of electronic integration in B2B procurement processes. Management Sci. 48(10):1301–1313.Link, Google Scholar
• Nan N (2011) Capturing bottom-up information technology use processes: A complex adaptive systems model. MIS Quart. 35(2):505–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1997) Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management J. 18(9):697–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patnayakuni R, Rai A, Seth N (2006) Relational antecedents of information flow integration for supply chain coordination. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(1):13–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P, Organ D (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management 12(4):531–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S, Lee J, Podsakoff N (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Millar VE (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 63(4):149–160.Google Scholar
• Ragowsky A, Licker PS, Gefen D (2008) Give me information, not technology. Comm. ACM 51(6):23–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Patnayakuni R (1996) A structural model for CASE adoption behavior. J. Management Inform. Systems 13(2):205–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Seth N (2006) Firm performance impacts of digitally-enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. 30(2):225–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy K, Premkumar G, Crum MR (1999) Organizational and interorganizational determinants of EDI diffusion and organizational performance: A causal model. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce 9(4):253–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2):237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheer A (1994) Business Process Engineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein HH (1992) The role of the CEO in the management of change: The case of information technology. Kochan TA, Kochan MU, eds. Transforming Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 80–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HA, McKeen JD (2005) Information delivery: IT's evolving role. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(11):197–210.Google Scholar
• Soh CPP, Yap CS, Raman KS (1992) Impact of consultants on computerization success in small businesses. Inform. Management 22(5):309–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson BE, Ramiller NC (1997) The organization vision in information systems innovation. Organ. Sci. 8(5):458–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Tai LA, Phelps R (2000) CEO and CIO perceptions of information systems strategy: Evidence from Hong Kong. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 9(3):167–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teo HH, Wei KK, Benbasat I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt inter-organizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quart. 27(1):19–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas JB, Clark SM, Gioia DA (1993) Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 36(2):239–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Truman G (2000) Integration in electronic exchange environments. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(1):209–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuomi I (1999) Data is more than knowledge: Implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. J. Management Inform. Systems 16(3):103–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich D, Smallwood N (2004) Capitalizing on capabilities. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(6):119–127.Google Scholar
• Vandenbosch B, Huff SL (1997) Searching and scanning: How executives obtain information from executive information systems. MIS Quart. 21(1):81–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade M, Hulland J (2004) Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. 28(1):107–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson F, Desmond J, Roberts H (1994) Success and failure of MRP II implementation. British J. Management 5(3):221–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu J (2005) Harnessing the power of exception reporting: Empowering the information enterprise. Inform. Management Magazine (September), http://www.information-management.com/issues/20050901/1035605-1.html.Google Scholar
• Yi MY, Davis FD (2003) Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. 14(2):146–169.Link, Google Scholar