Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders

References

  • Anthony R. N.Planning and Control: A Framework for Analysis (1965) (Harvard University Press, Boston MA) Google Scholar
  • Anthony R. N.The Management Control Function (1988) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Barrett S. Strategic Alternatives and Inter-Organizational System Implementations: An Overview. J. Management Inform. Systems (1986-87) 3(3):5–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blair J. D., Boal K. B. Strategy formation processes in health care organizations: A context-specific examination of context-free strategy issues. J. Management (1991) 17(2):305–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boynton A. C., Zmud R. W. Information technology planning in the 1990's: Directions for practice and research. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(1):59–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camillus J. C., Lederer A. L. Corporate strategy and the design of computerized information systems. Sloan Management Rev. (1985) 26(3):35–42Google Scholar
  • Cash J. I., McFarlan F. W., McKenney J. L., Vitale M. R.Corporate Information Systems Management: Text and Cases (1988) (Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Chagnanti R., Sambharya R. Strategic reorientation and upper echelon characteristics. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:393–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan Y. E., Huff S. L. Strategy: An information systems research perspective. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (1992) 1(4):191–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan Y. E., Huff S. L. Investigating information systems strategic alignment. Proc. Fourteenth Internat. Conf. on Information Systems (1993) 345–363Google Scholar
  • Chan Y. E., Huff S. L., Copeland D. G., Barclay D. W. Business strategy, information systems strategy, and strategic alignment. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(2):125–150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Conant J. S., Mokwa M. P., Wood S. D. Management styles and marketing strategies: An analysis of HMOs. Health Care Management Rev. (1987) 12(4):65–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croteau A., Bergeron F. La trilogie de l'harmonisation technologique: Stratégie d'enterprise, déploiement technologique et performance organisationnelle. Proc. Admin. Sci. Assoc. Canada (1999) 20(4):57–67Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Weick K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):284–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das S. R., Zahra S. A., Warkentin M. E. Integrating the content and process of strategic MIS planning with competitive strategy. Decision Sci. (1991) 22:953–984CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G., Olson M.Management Information Systems (1985) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Delery J., Doty D. H. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictors. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):802–835CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Ireland R. D., Hitt M. A. Industry effects and strategic management research. J. Management (1990) 16(1):6–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Robinson R. B. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5(3):265–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dillman D.The Total Design Method (1978) (Wiley Interscience, New York) Google Scholar
  • Doty D. H., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drazin R., Van de Ven A. H. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:514–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Earl M. J.Management Strategies for Information Technology (1989) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Earl M. J. Experiences in strategic information systems planning. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert A. H. An Analysis of the relationships among information systems design, strategy, and organizational performance using structural equation modeling. (1995) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Administration and Business, Louisiana Tech. University, AugustGoogle Scholar
  • Gorry G. A., Scott Morton M. A framework for management information systems. Sloan Management Rev. (1991) . (Fall, reprinted Spring 1989)Google Scholar
  • Govindarajan V. A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business unit level: Integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(84):828–853CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gresov C. Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:431–453CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta Y. P., Karimi J., Somers T. M. Alignment of a firm's competitive strategy and information technology management sophistication: The missing link. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1997) 44(4):400–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Grablowsky B. J.Multivariate Data Analysis (1979) (The Petroleum Publishing Company, Tulsa, OK) Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C. Environment, strategy, and power within top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:253–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C. Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26(1):5–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson J. C., Sifonis J. G. The value of strategic IS planning: understanding consistency, validity, and IS markets. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(2):187–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson J. C., Venkatraman N., Kochan T. A., Useem M. Strategic alignment: A model for organizational transformation through information technology. Transforming Organizations (1992) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) Google Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Ives B. Organizing for global competition: The fit of information technology. Decision Sci. (1993) 24(3):547–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnston H. R., Carrico S. R. Developing capabilities to use information strategically. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(1):37–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnston H. R., Vitale M. R. Creating competitive advantage with inter-organizational information systems. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(2):152–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karimi J., Gupta Y. P., Somers T. M. Impact of competitive strategy and information technology maturity on firms' response to globalization. J. MIS (1996a) 12(4):55–88Google Scholar
  • Karimi J., Gupta Y. P., Somers T. M. The congruence between a firm's competitive strategy and information technology leader's rank and role. J. MIS (1996b) 13(1):63–88Google Scholar
  • Ketchen D. J., Thomas J. B., Snow C. C. Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1278–1313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King W. R. Strategic planning for management information systems. MIS Quart. (1978) 2(1):27–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King W. R., Teo T. S. H. Integration between business planning and information systems planning: Validating a stage hypothesis. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(2):279–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King W. R., Zmud R. W. Managing information systems: Policy planning, strategic planning, and operational planning. Proc. Second Internat. Conf. Information Systems (1981) (Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  • Lederer A. L., Mendelow A. L. Information resource planning: Overcoming difficulties in identifying top management's objectives. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(3):389–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lederer A. L., Mendelow A. L. Coordination of information systems plans with business plans. J. MIS (1989) 6(2):5–19Google Scholar
  • Lederer A. L., Sethi V. The implementation of strategic information systems planning methodologies. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(3):445–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lorr M.Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists (1983) (Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Luftman J., Papp R., Brier T. Enablers and inhibitors of business-IT alignment. Comm. AIS (1999) 1(11):1999Google Scholar
  • McDaniel S. W., Kolari J. W. Marketing strategy implications of the Miles and Snow strategic typology. J. Marketing (1987) 51(4):19–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKenney J. L., Mason R. O., Copeland D. G. Bank of America: The crest and trough of technological leadership. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(3):321–353CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Hinings C. R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1175–1195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C. Fit, failure, and the hall of fame. California Management Rev. (1984) 26(3):10–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles R. E., Snow C. C., Meyer A. D., Coleman H. J. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(3):546–562CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Niederman Fred, James Brancheau, James Wetherbe. Information systems management issues for the 1990's. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(4):475–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Odom R., Boxx W. F. Environment, planning processes, and organizational performance of churches. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:197–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papp R. Business-IT Alignment: Productivity paradox payoff? Industrial Management and Data Systems (1999) 99(7/8):367–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E.Competitive Advantage (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Premkumar G., King W. R. Organizational characteristics and information systems planning: An empirical study. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(2):75–109LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raghunathan B., Raghunathan T. S. Planning implications of the information systems strategic grid: An empirical investigation. Decision Sci. (1990) 21(2):287–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raghunathan T. S., King W. R. The impact of information systems planning on the organization. OMEGA Internat. J. Management Sci. (1988) 16(2):85–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reich B. H., Benbasat I. Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(1):55–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reich B. H., Benbasat I. Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quart. (2000) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson R. B., Pearce J. A. Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:43–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rotemberg J. J., Saloner G., Scott Morton Michael S. Interfirm competition and collaboration. The Corporation of The 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation (1991) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) Google Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., King W. R. An empirical taxonomy of the decision-making processes concerning strategic applications of information systems. J. MIS (1995) 11(4):177–214Google Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., Kirs P. The alignment between organizational critical success factors and information technology capability in academic institutions. Decision Sci. (1994) 25(2):301–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., Robey D. An empirical taxonomy of implementation processes based on sequences of events in information system development. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(4):548–576LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. Factors influencing information technology management architectures in organizations: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segars A., Grover V. Strategic information systems planning success: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(2):139–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segev E. A Systematic comparative analysis and synthesis of two business-level strategic typologies. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:487–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shortell S. M., Zajac E. J. Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(4):817–832CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • SIM Aligning technology and corporate goals is top concern. SIM NETWORK (1996) xii(iii):12Google Scholar
  • Simon R. Accounting control systems and business strategy. Accounting Organ. Soc. (1987) 12:357–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith K. G., Guthrie J. P., Chen M. J. Strategy, size, and performance. Organ. Stud. (1989) 10(1):63–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snow C. C., Hrebiniak L. G. Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25:317–336CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suomi R. Inter-organizational information systems as company resources. Inform. Management (1988) 15:105–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Synnott W. R.The Information Weapon: Winning Customers and Markets with Technology (1987) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thomas H., Venkatraman N. Research on strategic groups: Progress and prognosis. J. Management Stud. (1988) 25(6):537–555CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiryakian E. A., Sills O. L. Typologies. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (1968) (Macmillan and Free Press, New York) 177–186Google Scholar
  • Ulrich D., McKelvey B. General organizational classification: An empirical test using the United States and Japanese electronic industry. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(1):99–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N. Strategic orientation of business enterprises. Management Sci. (1989a) 35(8):942–962LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. (1989b) 14(3):423–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N., Prescott J. E. Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N., Ramanujam V. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11:801–814CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward J. H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1963) 58:236–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward J., Griffiths P., Whitmore P.Strategic Planning for Information Systems (1990) (John Wiley Series in Information Systems, Chichester, U.K) Google Scholar
  • White R. E. Generic business strategies: Organizational context and performance. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiseman C.Strategic Information Systems (1988) (Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Zahra S. A., Pearce J. A. Research evidence on the Miles-Snow typology. J. Management (1990) 16(4):751–768CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajac E., Shortell S.M. Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction and performance implications. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:413–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zviran M. Relationships between organizational and information systems objectives: some empirical evidence. J. MIS (1990) 7(1):65–84Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.