A Foundation for Flexible Automated Electronic Communication

References

  • Allen J. F., Kautz H. A., Hobbs J. R., Moore R. C. A model of naive temporal reasoning. Formal Theories of the Commonsense World (1985) (Ablex Publishing Corp.)251–268Google Scholar
  • Apple Computer, Inc Apple Event registry: Standard suites. (1996) . http://dev2.info.apple.com/FTPIndices/App-3.html downloaded on August 13Google Scholar
  • Austin J. L.How To Do Things With Words (1975) 2nd ed.(Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bach K., Harnish R. M.Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts (1979) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Baker S. Forget the huddled masses: Send nerds. Business Week (1997) July 21):110Google Scholar
  • Baldassari M., Bruno G., Jensen K., Rozenberg G. PROTOB: An object oriented methodology for developing discrete event dynamic systems. High Level Petri Nets (1991) (Springer-Verlag)624–648CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barbuceanu M., Fox M. S. COOL: A language for describing coordination in multi-agent systems. Proc. First Internat. Conf. Multiagent Systems (1995) (AAAI Press, San Francisco, CA) 17–24Google Scholar
  • Barbuceanu M., Fox M. S. Coordinating multiple agents in the supply chain. Proc. 5th Workshops on Enabling Tech.: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (1996a) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Stanford, CA) 134–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barbuceanu M., Fox M. S. The design of a coordination language for multi-agent systems. Intelligent Agents III: Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages (1996b) (Springer-Verlag)341–55(Budapest, Hungary, August 12-13, 1996), ECAIGoogle Scholar
  • Borenstein N. S. Computational mail as network infrastructure for computer-supported cooperative work. J. Turner, R. Kraut, eds. Proce. Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (1992) (ACM Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 67–74Google Scholar
  • Bruno G., Elia A., Spaccapietra S. Extending the entity-relationship approach for dynamic modeling purposes. Entity-Relationship Approach (1987) (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 169–181Google Scholar
  • Castells M.The Rise of the Network Society, vol. I of The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture (1996) (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cohen P. R., Perrault C. R., Bond A. H., Gasser L. Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence (1988) (Morgan Kaufman)169–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compaq Computer Corporation Compaq EDI home page. (1999) . < http://www.compaq.com/corporate/EDI/> downloaded on June 11Google Scholar
  • Covington M. A. Speech acts, electronic commerce, and KQML. Decision Support Systems (1998) 22:203–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DARPA Knowledge Sharing Initiative External Interfaces Working Group Specification of the KQML Agent-Communication Language. (1993) . http://www.cs.umbc.edu/kqml/kqmlspec.ps, June 15. Downloaded on July 14, 1997Google Scholar
  • Finin T., Fritzson R., McKay D., McEntire R. KQML as an agent communication language. Proce. Third Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (1994) (ACM Press, New York) 456–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flores F., Graves M., Hartfield B., Winograd T. Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction. ACM Trans. Office Inform. Systems (1988) 6(2):153–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents FIPA 97 specification part 2: Agent communication language. (1997) (Geneva, Switzerland). http://www.fipa.orgGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon M. D., Moore S. A. Depicting the use and purpose of documents to improve information retrieval. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 23–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grice P. Meaning, Grice P.Studies in the Way of Words (1989) (Harvard University Press)213–223Originally published in Philos. Rev. 1957, 66:377–88Google Scholar
  • Harel D. Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Sci. Comput. Programming (1987) 8:231–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heuser C. A., Richter G., Rozenberg G. Constructs for modeling information systems with Petri nets. Advances in Petri Nets (1992) (Springer-Verlag, Sheffield, U.K.) 224–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurst G., Kimbrough S. O., Moore S. A., Oliver J. R. The next generation: Exploiting advanced protocols for electronic commerce. Frontiers in Electronic Commerce: Experimental Systems for Communication, Coordination, and Negotiation (1992) (Philadelphia, PA). SEI Center for Advanced Studies in Management (affiliated with Wharton)Google Scholar
  • Kimbrough S. O. On representing schemes for promising electronically. Decision Support Systems (1990) 99–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimbrough S. O., Hua H. On defeasible reasoning with the method of sweeping presumptions. Minds and Machines (1991) 1(4):393–416CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimbrough S. O., Moore S. A. Message management systems: Concepts, motivations, and strategic effects. J. Management Inform. Systems (1992) 9(2):29–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimbrough S. O., Moore S. A., Nunamaker J. On obligation, time, and defeasibility in systems for electronic commerce. Proc. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1993) (University of Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA) 493–502vol. IIICrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimbrough S. O., Moore S. A. On automated message processing in electronic commerce and work support systems: Speech act theory and expressive felicity. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1997) 15(4):321–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimbrough S. O., Moore S. A. On the spanning hypothesis for EDI semantics. Proc. 32nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (1999) (University of Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society Press)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Labrou Y. Semantics for an agent communication language. (1996) . PhD thesis UMI #9700710. Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Labrou Y., Finin T. A semantics approach for KQML—a general purpose communication language for software agents. Proc. Third Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (1994) (National Institute of Standards and Technology, ACM Press, New York) 447–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Labrou Y., Finin T. A proposal for a new KQML specification. Technical Report CS-97-03. (1997) . http://www.cs.umbc.edu/kqml/Google Scholar
  • Lee R. M. Bureaucracies as deontic systems. ACM Trans. Office Inform. Systems (1988) 6(2):87–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee Y. K., Park S. J. OPNets: An object-oriented high-level Petri net model for real-time system modeling. J. Systems Software (1993) 20:69–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinson S. C.Pragmatics (1983) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Light R.Presenting XML (1997) 1st ed.(SAMS.net Publishing, Indianapolis, IN) Google Scholar
  • Litman D. J., Allen J. F. A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversations. Cogn. Sci. (1987) 11:163–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maiocchi R., Pernici B., Bracchi G., Tsichritzis D. Time reasoning in the office environment. Office Systems: Methods and Tools (1987) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 223–246Google Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Grant K. R., Turbak F. A., Brobst S. A., Cohen M. D. Intelligent information-sharing systems. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(5):390–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCarthy J. Elephant 2000: A programming language based on speech acts. (1993) . http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/elephant.psGoogle Scholar
  • Moore R. C., Hobbs J. R., Moore R. C. A formal theory of knowledge and action. Formal Theories of the Commonsense World (1985) (Ablex Publishing Corp.)319–358Google Scholar
  • Moore S. A. Categorizing automated messages. Decision Support Systems (1998) 22(3):213–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore S. A. KQML & FLBC: Contrasting agent communication languages. Internat. J. Electr. Commerce Forthcoming (2000a) Google Scholar
  • Moore S. A., Dignum F., Greaves M. On conversation policies and the need for exceptions. Issues in Agent Communication (2000b) (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Springer-Verlag)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore S. A., Kimbrough S. O. Message management systems at work: Prototypes for business communication. J. Organ. Comput. (1995) 5(2):83–100Google Scholar
  • Oberweis A., Lausen G., Bracchi G., Tsichritzis D. Temporal aspects in office information systems. Office Systems: Methods and Tools (1987) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 247–266Google Scholar
  • Object Management Group (1999) . CORBA 2.2/IIOP Specification. < http://www.omg.org/library/c2indx.html>Google Scholar
  • Peterson J. L.Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems (1981) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Pinci V., Shapiro R., Jensen K., Rozenberg G. An integrated software development methodology based on hierarchical colored Petri nets. High Level Petri Nets (1991) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 649–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi L. A formal model of the structure of discourse. J. Pragmatics (1988) 12:601–638CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richter G., Voss K., Rozenberg G. Towards a comprehensive office model integrating information and resources. Advances in Petri Nets (1985) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 401–417Google Scholar
  • Shoham Y. Agent-oriented programming. Artificial Intelligence (1993) 60:51–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strawson P., Rosenberg J. F., Travis C. On referring. Readings in the Philosophy of Language (1971) (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 320–44Google Scholar
  • Winograd T., Flores C. F.Understanding Computers and Cognition (1986) (Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Zisman M.Use of production systems for modeling asynchronous concurrent processes (1977) (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) . Ph.D. thesisCrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.