Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact

References

• Adam B.Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time (1995) (Polity Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Agre P. E.Computation and Human Experience (1997) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Applegate L. M., Cash J. I., Mills D. Q. Information technology and tomorrow's manager. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 66(6):128–136Google Scholar
• Attewell P., Rule J. Computing and organizations: What we know and what we don't know. Comm. ACM (1984) 27(12):1184–1191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beath C. M., Orlikowski W. J. The contradictory structure of systems development methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-user relationship in information engineering. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(4):350–377Link, Google Scholar
• Bijker W. E.Of Bicycles Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Button G., Graham Button. The curious case of the vanishing technology. Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology (1993) (Routledge, London, U.K.) 10–28Google Scholar
• Castells M.The Rise of the Network Society (1996) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Gasser L. The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Trans. Office Inform. Systems (1986) 4(3):205–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• George J. F., Easton G. K., Nunamaker J., Northcraft G. B. A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(4):394–415Link, Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Grint K., Woolgar S. On some failures of nerve in constructivist and feminist analyses of technology. Sci. Tech., Human Values (1995) 20(3):286–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacono S., Kling R., JoAnne Yates, John Van Maanen. Computerization movements: The rise of the internet and distant forms of work. IT and Organizational Transformation: History, Rhetoric, and Practice (2001) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 93–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Illich I.Tools for Conviviality (1973) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Kling R., Boland Richard J., Rudy Hirschheim. Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (1987) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 307–362Google Scholar
• Kling R., Dutton W. H., Danziger J. N., Dutton W. H., Kling R., Kraemer K. L. The computer package, dynamic complexity. Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments (1982) (Columbia University Press, New York) 22–50Google Scholar
• Kling R., Scacchi W. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Adv. Comput. (1982) 21):1–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B.Science in Action (1987) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Leavitt H. J., Whisler T. L. Management in the 1980s. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1958) 36(6):41–48Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Robey D. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. (1988) 34(5):583–598Link, Google Scholar
• Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Barley S. R. Technology and institution: What can research on information technology and research on organization studies learn from each other. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Baroudi J. J. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(1):1–28Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Iacono C. S., Erik Brynjolfsson, Brian Kahin. The truth is not out there: An enacted view of the digital economy. Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 352–380Google Scholar
• Pinch T. J., Bijker W. E., Bijker W. E., Hughes T. P., Pinch T. J. The social construction of facts and artifacts. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (1987) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 17–50Google Scholar
• Robey D., Boudreau M. C. Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):167–185Link, Google Scholar
• Robey D., Sahay S. Transforming work through information technology: A comparative case study of geographic information systems in county government. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):93–110Link, Google Scholar
• Rogers E.The Diffusion of Innovation (1983) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Strauss A. L.Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (1987) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman L. A., Rob Kling. Supporting articulation work. Computerization and Controversy (1996) 2nd ed.(Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 407–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trice A., Davis R. Heuristics for reconciling independent knowledge bases. Inform. Systems Res. (1993) 4(3):262–288Link, Google Scholar