The Impact of E-Commerce Announcements on the Market Value of Firms

References

  • Agrawal J., Kamakura W. A. The economic worth of celebrity endorsers: An event study analysis. J. Marketing (1995) 59:56–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barua A., Kriebel C. H., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(1):3–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benaroch M. A., Kauffman R. J. A case for using option pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(1LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj A., Bharadwaj S. G., Konsynski B. R. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's. q. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):1008–1024LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S., Warner J. Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. J. Financial Econom. (1985) 14:3–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burnham B.How to Invest in E-commerce Stocks (1998) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Business Wire America OnLine and Monster.com announce exclusive four-year, $100-million career search relationship. (December 2, 1999) Google Scholar
  • Campbell J. Y., Lo A. W., MacKinlay A. C. Event-study analysis. The Econometrics of Financial Markets (1997) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 149–180Chapter 4 inGoogle Scholar
  • Chandy R. K., Tellis G. J. The incumbents' curse? incumbency, size and radical product innovation. J. Marketing (2000) 64(3):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaney P. K., Devinney T. M., Winer R. S. The impact of new product introductions on the market value. J. Bus. (1991) 64(4):573–611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee S. Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7(2):119–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conner K. R., Prahalad C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):477–501LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Das S., Sen P. K., Sengupta S. Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(1):27–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta S., Laplante B., Mamingi N. Capital market responses to environmental performance in developing countries. Rep. World Bank Development Res. Group(October 1997Google Scholar
  • Davenport T. H.Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Davidson W. N., Worrell D. L., Dutia D. The stock market effects of CEO succession in bankrupt firms. J. Management (1993) 19(3):517–533Google Scholar
  • Diederich T. Launching e-commerce sites takes deep pockets. CNN Interactive (May 31, 1999) . 〈 http://cnn.com/TECH/computing/9905/31/pockets.idg/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Doran D. T. Tests of the earnings signaling and attention directing hypotheses using analysts forecasts and revisions. J. Accounting, Auditing Finance (1994) 9(3):411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doran D. T. Stock splits and false signaling cost within a management reputation framework. J. Appl. Bus. Res. (1995) 11(3):115–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dos Santos B. L., Peffers K., Mauer D. C. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Inform. Syst. Res. (1993) 4(1):1–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dow Jones creates new index based on internet sharesThe Wall Street Journal (1999) February 18Google Scholar
  • Evans P., Wurster T. S.Blown to Bits: How the Economics of Information Transforms Strategy (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fama E., Fisher L., Jensen M. C., Roll R. The adjustment of stock prices to new information. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1969) 10(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., March J. G. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:171–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Financial Times The Internet revolution: Lies, damned lies and web valuations. (2000) . October 12Google Scholar
  • Financial Times The Internet revolution: Money for nothing and cheques for free. (2000) October 13Google Scholar
  • Fox J. Net stock rules: Masters of a parallel universe. Fortune (1999) 139(11):66–100Google Scholar
  • Giga Information Group Giga information group predicts strong B2C e-commerce growth despite dot com shakeout. (2000) . Press Release. Available online at 〈 www.gigaweb.com/marketing/home.asp?intgcontextid=15&strmode=newsroom1〉 (July 18)Google Scholar
  • Ginsburg J. Selling sofas online is no snap. Business Week (2000) April 3):96–98Google Scholar
  • Green H. T'was the season for e-splurging. Business Week (1999) January 18):40–42Google Scholar
  • Greenwood J., Jovanovic B. The IT revolution and the stock market. NBERWorking paper No. 6931Google Scholar
  • Hamel G., Sampler J. The e-corporation: More than just web-based, it's building a new industrial order. Fortune (1998) 138(11):80–92Google Scholar
  • Hanson W.Principles of Internet Marketing (2000) (South-Western College Publishing)Google Scholar
  • Hart P., Saunders C. Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(1):23–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heinkel R. A theory of credibility: Truthtelling in a rational expectations, infinite horizon model. (1994) (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson J. C., Subramani M. R., Oblinger D. G., Katz R. N. The shifting ground between markets and hierarchy: Managing a portfolio of relationships. Renewing Administration (1999) (Anker Publishing, Bolton, MA) 99–125Google Scholar
  • Hitt L. M., Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):121–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horsky D., Swyngedouw P. Does it pay to change your company's name? A stock market perspective. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(4):320–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ikenberry D. L., Rankine G., Stice E. K. What do stock splits really signal? J. Finance Quant. Anal. (1996) 31(3):357–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Information Week 500: Industries at A Glance. September 1998. Available online at 〈 http://www.informationweek.com/700/500index.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Jarrell G. A., Poulsen A. B. The returns to acquiring firms in tender offers: Evidence from three decades. Financial Management (1989) 18(3):12–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Junnarkar S. B2B investing no certain road to riches. CNET News.com. (March 2, 2000) . available online at: 〈 http://technews.netscape.com/news/0-1007-200-1562910-0.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Judge G. G., Hill R. C., Griffiths W. E., Lütkepohl H., Lee T. C.Introduction To The Theory And Practice Of Econometrics (1988) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale P., Singh H. Alliance capability and success: A knowledge based approach. Proc. Fifty Ninth Annual Acad. Management Conf. (1999) . Chicago. BPS 01–06CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koh J., Venkatraman N. Joint venture formations and stock market reactions: An assessment in the information technology sector. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(4):869–892CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane V., Jacobson R. Stock market reactions to brand extension announcements: The effects of brand attitude and familiarity. J. Marketing (1995) 59(1):63–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:111–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucchetti A. Internet-firm valuations prove a challenge amid fluctuations. The Wall Street Journal (November 30, 1998) C1Google Scholar
  • MacKinlay C. A. Event studies in economics and finance. J. Econom. Literature (1997) 35:13–39Google Scholar
  • McWilliams A., Siegel D. Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(3):626–657CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meznar M. B., Nigh D., Kwok C. C. Y. Effect of announcements of withdrawal from South Africa on stockholder wealth. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(6):1633–1648CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mukhopadhyay T., Kekre S., Kalathur S. Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):137–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Negroponte N.Being Digital (1995) (Alfred A. Knopf, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory Of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Neuborne E. E-tail: Gleaming storefronts with nothing inside. Business Week (May 1, 2000) 95–97Google Scholar
  • Nua Internet Surveys How many online. (2000) . Available online at 〈 www.nua.ie/surveys/how_many_online/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Pareira J. On the Internet, Toys “R” Us plays catch-up. Wall Street Journal (1999) August 19Google Scholar
  • Paul L. G. E-tailers take heed. Datamation (1999) . 〈 http://www.datamation.com/ecomm/9909paul1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(3):179–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sahlman W. A., Stevenson H. H. Capital market myopia. J. Bus. Venturing (1985) 1:7–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Satterthwaite R. Survey results: The real costs of e-commerce. Gartner Advisory Res. Note (1999) . M-07-8931Google Scholar
  • Shankar V., Carpenter G. S., Krishnamurthi L. Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35:54–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C., Varian H.Information Rules (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Smith G. Where the big boys fear to tread. Business Week (1998) December 14Google Scholar
  • Spiro L. N. Merrill's e-battle. Business Week (1999) November 15Google Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H. Unlearning ineffective or obsolete technologies. Internat. J. Tech. Management (1996) 11:725–737Google Scholar
  • Subramani M. R., Walden E. The game of the name: A comparison of capital market reactions to DOTCOM vs. traditional name changes. MIS Research Center. (2000) . Working paper #00-14. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Available online at 〈 http://misrc.umn.edu/wpaper/WorkingPapers/DotComName.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Tempest N. Charles Schwab Corporation (B). (1999) (Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA) . Business Case 9-300-025Google Scholar
  • Vickers M., Weiss G. Wall Street's hype machine: It could spell trouble for investors. Business Week (2000) April 3Google Scholar
  • Warner Melanie. Nightmare on net street. Fortune (September 6, 1999) 285–288Google Scholar
  • Walsh Sharon. Schwab tops Merrill in market value. The Washington Post (1998) December 29Google Scholar
  • Westphal J. D., Zajac E. J. The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reform and shareholder reactions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(1):127–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright P., Ferris S. P., Hiller J. S., Kroll M. Competitiveness through management of diversity: Effects on stock price valuation. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):272–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoffie D. B., Cusumano M. A. Building a company on Internet time: Lessons from netscape. California Management Rev. (1999) 41(3):8–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.