Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters

References

• Belanger F. Workers' propensity to telecommute: An empirical study. Inform. and Management (1999) 35(3 (March)):139–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belanger F. Communication patterns in distributed work groups: A network analysis. IEEE Trans. on Professional Comm. (1999) 42(4 (December)):261–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belanger F., Collins R. Distributed work arrangements: A research framework. The Inform. Soc.: An Internat. J. (1998) 15(2 (April–June)):137–152Google Scholar
• Becker T. E., Billings R. S., Eveleth D. M., Gilbert N. L. Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(2):464–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.UCINET IV Version 1.00 (1992) (Analytic Technologies, Natick, MA) Google Scholar
• Burkhardt M. E., Brass D. J. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:104–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman A. J., Sheeney N. P., Heywood S., Dooley B., Collins S. C., Cooper C. L., Robertson I. T. The organizational implications of telecommuting. Internat. Rev. of Indus. and Organ. Psych. (1995) 10(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Cross T. B., Raizman M.Telecommuting: The Future Technology of Work (1986) (Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1 (March)):60–95Link, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G. Attitudes towards telecommuting: Implications for work-at-home programs. Inform. and Management (1984) 7:133–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Monge P. Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):693–703Link, Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Van de Ven A. H. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:514–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duxbury L. E., Higgins C. A., Mills S. After-hours telecommuting and work family conflict: A comparative analysis. Inform. Sys. Res. (1992) 3(2):173–190Link, Google Scholar
• Duxbury L. E., Higgins C. A., Neufeld D. S., Igbaria M., Tan M. Telework and the balance between work and family: Is telework part of the problem or part of the solution? The Virtual Workplace (1998) (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA) 218–255Google Scholar
• Duxbury L. E., Neufeld D. An empirical evaluation of the impacts of telecommuting on intra-organizational communication. J. Engrg. and Tech. Management (1999) 16:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulk J., DeSanctis G. Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4 (July–August)):337–349Link, Google Scholar
• Gartner Group Remote Access Conference. (1999) (San Diego, CA). MarchGoogle Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2 (June)):213–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gooding R. Z., Kinicki A. J. Interpreting event causes: The complementary role of categorization and attribution processes. J. Management Stud. (1995) 32(1 (January)):1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon G. E. Telecommuting: Planning for a new work environment. J. Inform. Systems Management. (1986) 3(3 (Summer)):37–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V., Goslar M. D. The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in U.S. organizations. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(1 (Summer)):141–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta Y. P., Karimi J., Somers T. M. Telecommuting: Problems associated with communications technologies and their capabilities. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1995) 42(4 (November)):305–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutek B. A., Galegher J., Kraut Robert E., Carmen Egido. Work group structure and information technology: A structural contingency approach. Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundation of Cooperative Work (1990) (Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 63–78Google Scholar
• Hartman R. L., Stoner C. R., Arora R. Developing successful organizational telecommuting arrangements: Worker perception and managerial prescriptions. SAM Advanced Management J. (1992) 57(3 (Summer)):35–42Google Scholar
• Hastie R. Causes and effects of causal attribution. J. Personality & Soc. Psych. (1984) 46(1 (January)):44–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P., Kiesler S. Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4 (July–August)):373–393Link, Google Scholar
• Hogarth R.Judgment and Choice: The Psychology of Decision (1980) (John Wiley, Chichester NY) Google Scholar
• Huber G. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence and decision making. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(1 (January)):47–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hufnagel E. M., Conca C. User response data: The potential for errors and biases. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(1 (March)):48–73Link, Google Scholar
• Huws I., Korte W. B., Robinson S.Telecommuting: Towards the Elusive Office (1990) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• JALA International Telecommuting Forecast. (1999) . http://www.jala.com/ustcforecast.htmGoogle Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Ives B. Organizing for global competition: The fit of information technology. Decision Sci. (1993) 24(3 (May/June)):547–580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz A. I. The management, control, and evaluation of a telecommuting project: A case study. Inform. and Management (1987) 13:179–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoke D., Kuklinski J. H.Network Analysis (1982) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Kulik C. T., Ambrose M. L. Category-based and feature-based process in performance appraisal: Integrating visual and computerized sources of performance data. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78 (October):821–830Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCloskey D. W., Igbaria M., Igbaria M., Tan M. A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and directions for future research. The Virtual Workplace (1998) (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA) 338–358Google Scholar
• Mohrman A. M., Lawler E. E., McFarlan F. W. A review of theory and research. The Information Systems Research Challenge, Proceedings (1984) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 135–164Google Scholar
• Monge P., Eisenberg E. M., Jablin F., et al. Emergent communication networks. Handbook of Organizational Communications (1987) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) 204–342Google Scholar
• Nadler D., Tushman M.Strategic Organization Design (1988) (Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview, IL) Google Scholar
• Norenzayan A., Schwarz N. Telling what they want to know: Participants tailor causal attributions to researchers' interests. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1999) 29(8 (December)):1011–1020Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Olson M., Primps S. B. Working at home with computers: Work and nonwork issues. J. Soc. Issues (1984) 40(3):97–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt J. H. 1999 Telework America National Telework Survey. (1999) . International Telework Association and Council http://www.telecommute.org/Google Scholar
• Ramsower R. M.Telecommuting: The Organizational and Behavioral Effects of Working at Home (1985) (UMI Research Press, Ann Arbor MI) Google Scholar
• Reynolds H. T.The Analysis of Cross Classifications (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rogers E., Kincaid D.Communications Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research (1981) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ruppel C., Harrington S. J. Telecommuting: An innovation where nobody is getting on the bandwagon? Database (1995) 16(2/3 (May/August)):87–104Google Scholar
• Shane B. Open and rigid communication networks: A reevaluation by simulation. Small Group Behavior (1979) 10:242–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1976) 41(3 (April)):322–228Google Scholar
• Venkatesh A., Vitalari N. P. An emerging distributed work arrangement: An investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Sci. (1992) 38(12 (December)):1687–1706Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 4(3):423–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vessey I., Galletta D. Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(1 (March)):63–84Link, Google Scholar
• Watson-Fritz M. B., Narasimham S., Rhee H. K. Communication and Coordination in the Virtual Office. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4 (Spring)):7–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wigand R. T., Goldhaber G. M., Barnett G. A. Communication network analysis: History and overview. Handbook of Organ. Comm. (1988) (Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ) 319–359Google Scholar