The Effects of Time Pressure on Quality in Software Development: An Agency Model

References

• Abdel-Hamid T., Sengupta K., Ronan D. Software project control: An experimental investigation of judgment with fallible information. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1993) 19(6):603–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdel-Hamid T., Madnick S. The impact of schedule estimation on software project behavior. IEEE Software (1986) 3(4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdel-Hamid T., Madnick S. Lessons learned from modeling the dynamics of software development. Comm. ACM (1989) 32(12):1426–1435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alchian A. A., Demsetz H. Production information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1972) 62(5):777–795Google Scholar
• Argyris C.The Impacts of Budgets on People (1952) (Controllership Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
• Austin R. D.Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations (1996) (Dorset House, New York) Google Scholar
• Blau P. M.The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies (1963) 2nd ed.(The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Boehm B. W.Software Engineering Economics (1981) (Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Brooks F. P.The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering (1975) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks F. P. No silver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering. IEEE Comput. (1987) 20(4):10–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis W. Fifteen years of psychology in software engineering: Individual differences and cognitive science. Proc. Seventh Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. (1984) (Orlando, FL)97–106Google Scholar
• Curtis W. What if programmers were treated like jocks? Amer. Programmer (1997) 10(5):21–28Google Scholar
• Cusumano M. A., Selby R. W. Microsoft's weaknesses in software development. Amer. Programmer (1997) 10(10Google Scholar
• DeMarco T.Controlling Software Projects (1982) (Yourdon Press, A Prentice-Hall Company, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• DeMarco T.Why Does Software Cost So Much? (1995) (Dorset House Publishing)Google Scholar
• DeMarco T. Personal communication. (1997) Google Scholar
• Deming W. E.Out of the Crisis (1986) (MIT Center For Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gutierrez G. J., Kouvelis P. Parkinson's law and its implications for project management. Management Sci. (1991) 37(8):990–1001Link, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10:74–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B., Milgrom R. Multi-task principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1991) 7(Spring):25–52Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., Gill G. Microsoft corporation: Office business unit. (1990) (Boston, MA). Harvard Business School Case, 9-691-033Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadane J., Larkey P. D. Subjective probability and the theory of games. Management Sci. (1982) 28:113–120Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. (1979) 47:263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr S. On the folly of rewarding A., while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. (1975) 18(4):769–783Crossref, Google Scholar
• King W. R., Wilson T. A. Subjective time estimates in critical path planning—a preliminary analysis. Management Sci. (1967) 13(5):307–320Link, Google Scholar
• Kohn A. Why work incentives fall down on the job. USA Today (1993) December 16Google Scholar
• Larkey P., Caulkins J. All above average and other unintended consequences of performance appraisal systems. Paper presented at the National Public Management Res. Conf. (1992) (The Maxwell School, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY) . Technology and Inform. Policy ProgramGoogle Scholar
• MacCormack A., Verganti R., Iansiti M. Developing products on “internet time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. (1999) (Harvard Business School, Boston, MA) . Working PaperGoogle Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J.Economics, Organization and Management (1992) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Parkinson C. N.In-laws and Outlaws and Parkinson's Third Law (1962) (The Riverside Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Pate-Cornell M. E. Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: The case of offshore platforms. Science (1990) 30:1210–1216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgway V. F. Dysfunctional consequences of performance measurements. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1956) 1(2):240–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross S. The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1973) 63:134–139Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. Organizations and markets. J. Econom. Perspectives (1991) 5(1):25–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Goodman P. S. Counterforces to change. Change in Organizations (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Tomayko J. E.Teaching a Project-Intensive Introduction to Software Engineering (1987) (Pittsburgh, PA). Software Engineering Institute Technical Report, CMU/SEI-87-TR-20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Umpathy S.Current Budgeting Practices in U.S. Industry: The State of the Art (1987) (Quorum Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Yourdon E. Personal communication. (1997) Google Scholar