Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System

References

  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(3):557–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):204–301LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sci. (1999) 30(2):361–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. 1991. Organ. Behavior & Human Decision Process. (1991) 50(2):179–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(2):191–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Amer. Psych. (1982) 37(2):122–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barclay D. W., Higgins C. A., Thompson R. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Tech. Stud. (1995) 2(2):285–309Google Scholar
  • Blackwell R. Exact faces challenge from mondex, visa cash. Financial Post Daily (1997) March 6):E3Google Scholar
  • Bowers T., Singer M. Who will capture value in on-line financial services? The McKinsey Quart. (1996) 31(1):4–18Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Gopal A. Adoption intentions in GSS: Relative importance of beliefs. Data Base Adv. (1995) 26(2 & 3):42–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Newsted P. R., Hoyle R. H. Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research (1998) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):189–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper W. H., Richardson A. J. Unfair comparisons. J. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71(2):179–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crane D. B., Bodie Z. Form follows function: The transformation of banking. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(2):109–117Google Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dillman D.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method (1979) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Feldman J. M., Lynch J. G. Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. J. Appl. Psych. (1988) 73(3):421–435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intentions, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fornell C., Barclay D. W. Jackknifing: A supplement to Lohmöller's LVPLS program. (1983) . Working paper, Graduate School of Business Administration, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frambach R. T., Barkema H. G., Nooteboom B., Wedel M. Adoption of a service innovation in the business market: An empirical test of supply-side variables. J. Bus. Res. (1998) 41(2):161–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gagliardi P., Compeau D. The effects of group presentations on intentions to adopt smart card technology: A diffusion of innovations approach. Proc. Admin. Sci. Assoc. of Canada, 23rd Conf. (1995) 16(4). ASACGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Straub D. W. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(4):389–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (1995) 4th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hulland J. Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(2):195–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Humphrey D. B. Changes in retail payments: Will banks retain control? J. Retail Banking Services (1996) 18(2):51–56Google Scholar
  • Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., Cavaye A. L. M. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(3):279–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson C. M., Chow S., Leitch R. A. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(2):357–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Komenar M., Komenar M. The smart card game. Electronic Marketing (1997) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 211–247Google Scholar
  • Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):173–191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems. Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I., Kautz K., Pries-Heje J. Integrating diffusion of innovations and theory of reasoned action models to predict utilization of information technology by end-users. Proc.: Internat. Federation for Inform. Processing (IFIP) Working Conf. Diffusion and Adoption of Inform. Tech. (1994) (Chapman & Hall, Oslo, Norway) Google Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Phillips L. A., Calantone R., Lee M.-T. International technology adoption: Behavior structure, demand certainty and culture. J. Bus. Indust. Marketing (1994) 9(2):16–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D. User attitudes and management information system use. Acad. Management J. (1979) 22(3):527–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations4th ed.(, New York) Google Scholar
  • Roth P. L., Switzer F. S., Switzer D. M. Missing data in multiple item scales: A monte carlo analysis of missing data techniques. Organ. Res. Methods (1999) 2(3):211–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheppard B. H., Hartwick J., Warshaw P. R. The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15(3):325–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Souccar M. K. Smart cards: Mondex canada prepares test in a second city. The Amer. Banker (1998) November 12):16Google Scholar
  • Straub D., Limayem M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1328–1342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Keil M., Brenner W. H. Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three-country study. Inform. Management (1997) 33(1):1–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Sci. (1996) 42(1):85–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quart. (1995a) 19(4):561–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995b) 12(2):137–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995c) 6(2):144–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tornatzky L. G., Klein K. J. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1982) 29(1):28–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sci. (1996) 27(3):451–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):186–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vroom V. H.Work and Motivation (1964) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wildt A. R., Lambert Z. V., Durand R. M. Applying the jack-knife statistic in testing and interpreting canonical weights, loadings, and cross-loadings. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19(1):99–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wold H., Fornell C. Systems under indirect observation using PLS. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis: Volume 1—Methods (1982) (New York). Praeger chapter 15Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.