Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology

References

• Agar M.Speaking of Ethnography (1986) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Applegate L., King J. Rigor and relevance: Careers on the line. MISQ (1999) 23(1):18–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avison D., Myers M. Information systems and anthropology: An anthropological perspective on IT and organizational culture. Inform. Tech. People (1995) 8(3):43–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avison D., Wood-Harper T.Multiview, An Exploration in Business Systems Development (1990) (Blackwell, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Banville C., Landry M. Can the field of MIS be disciplined? Comm. ACM (1989) 32(1):48–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer S.Diagnosing the System for Organizations (1985) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K) Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Weber R. Rethinking “diversity” in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):389–399Link, Google Scholar
• Beynon-Davies P. Information systems “failure”: The case of the London Ambulance Service's computer aided despatch project. Euro. J. Inform. Systems (1995) 4:171–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.A Realist Theory of Science (1978) (Harvester, Hemel Hempstead, U.K) Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.The Possibility of Naturalism (1979) (Harvester Press, Sussex, U.K) Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.Reclaiming Reality (1989) (Verso, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.Plato Etc (1994) (Verso, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Blaike N. A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality and Quantity (1991) 25:115–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blaycock P., Rees P. Cognitive style and the usefulness of information. Decision Sci. (1984) 15:74–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Bono E.Conflicts: A Better Way to Resolve Them, Six Thinking Hats (1985) (Penguin, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Booth W.Critical Understanding: The Powers and Limits of Pluralism (1979) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Brocklesby J. Let the jury decide: Assessing the cultural feasibility of total systems intervention. Systems Practice (1994) 7(1):75–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brocklesby J. Intervening in the cultural constitution of systems—methodological complementarism and other visions for systems science. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1995) 46(11):1285–1298Google Scholar
• Brocklesby J., Cummings S. Combining hard, soft and critical methodologies in systems research: The cultural constraints. Systems Res. (1995) 12(1):239–245Google Scholar
• Burrell G., Morgan G.Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis (1979) (Heinemann, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Carlson P., Davis G. An investigation of media selection among directors and managers: From “self” to “other” orientation. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(3):335–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Checkland P.Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (1981) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K) Google Scholar
• Checkland P., Holwell S.Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field (1998) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K) Google Scholar
• Checkland P., Scholes J.Soft Systems Methodology in Action (1990) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K) Google Scholar
• Connolly T., Jessup L., Valacich J. Idea generation using a GDSS: Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):689–703Link, Google Scholar
• Deetz S. Describing differences in approach to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):191–207Link, Google Scholar
• Drummond H. The politics of risk: Trials and tribulations of the Taurus project. J. Inform. Tech. (1996) 11:347–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friend J., Hickling A.Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach (1987) (Pergamon, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Galliers R., Galliers R. Choosing appropriate information systems research approaches: A revised taxonomy. Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines (1991) (Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.) 144–162Google Scholar
• Galliers R.Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines (1992) (Blackwell, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Galliers R. Research issues in information systems. J. Inform. Tech. (1993) 8(2):92–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galliers R. Relevance and rigour in information systems research: Some personal reflections on issues facing the information systems research community. IFIP Trans. A—Comput. Sci. Tech. (1994) 54:93–101Google Scholar
• Galliers R., Mingers J., Stowell F. Reflections on information systems research: Twelve points of debate. Information Systems: an Emerging Discipline? (1996) (McGraw Hill, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Galliers R., Mylonopoulos N., Morris C., Meadows M. IS research agendas and practices in the UK. Proc. 2nd UKAIS Conf. (1997) (University of Southampton, U.K.) 143–168Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society (1984) (Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Gioia D., Pitre E. Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(4):584–602Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goles T., Hirschheim R. The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead . . . long live the paradigm: The legacy of Burrell and Morgan. Omega (2000) 28(3):249–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guba E., Guba E. The alternative paradigm dialog. The Paradigm Dialog (1990) (Sage Publications, CA) Google Scholar
• Habermas J. Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry (1970) 13:360–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Habermas J.Communication and the Evolution of Society (1979) (Heinemann, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Habermas J.The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (1984) (Heinemann, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Habermas J.The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (1987) (Polity Press, Oxford, U.K) Google Scholar
• Habermas J.Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (1990) (Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Habermas J., Habermas J. On the pragmatic, the ethical, and the moral employments of practical reason. Justification and Application (1993) (Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.) 1–17Google Scholar
• Harvey L., Myers M. Scholarship and practice: The contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap. Inform. Tech. People (1995) 8(3):13–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschheim R., Klein H. Four paradigms of information systems development. Comm. ACM (1989) 32(10):1199–1216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschheim R., Klein H., Lyytinen K. Exploring the intellectual foundations of information systems. Accounting, Management & Inform. Tech. (1996) 2(1/2):1–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keat R., Urry J.Social Theory as Science (1981) (RKP, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Kuhn T.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970) (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Landry M., Banville C. A disciplined methodological pluralism for MIS research. Accounting, Management & Inform. Tech. (1992) 2(2):77–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Layder D.New Strategies in Social Research (1993) (Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K) Google Scholar
• Lee A. Integrating positivist and interpretivist approaches to organizational research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:342–365Link, Google Scholar
• Lee A. Rigour and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(1):29–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis M., Grimes A. Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(4):672–690Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livari J., Hirschheim R., Klein H. A paradigmatic analysis contrasting information systems development approaches and methodologies. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):164–193Link, Google Scholar
• Livari J., Hirschheim R., Klein H. Making sense of the methodology jungle: A three-tiered framework for information systems development. (1999) . Working PaperGoogle Scholar
• Livari J., Hirschheim R., Klein H. A dynamic framework for classifying information systems development methodologies and approaches. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 17(3):177–216Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K., Klein H., Mumford E., Hirscheim R., Fitzgerald G., Wood-Harper T. The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. Research Methods in Information Systems (1985) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 219–236Google Scholar
• Markus L. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. (1994a) 5(4):502–527Link, Google Scholar
• Markus L. Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1994b) 12(2):119–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maturana H., Krohn W., Kuers G., Nowotny H. Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. Selforganization: Portrait of a Scientific Revolution (1990) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 12–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maturana H., Varela F.Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (1980) (Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maturana H., Varela F.The Tree of Knowledge (1987) (Shambhala, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Miles M., Huberman M.Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Mingers J. Recent developments in critical management science. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1992) 43(1):1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J.Self-Producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis (1995) (Plenum Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J., Mingers J., Gill A. Towards critical pluralism. Multimethodology: Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies (1997) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K.) 407–440Google Scholar
• Mingers J., Mathijs E., Van der Veken J., Van Belle H. Synthesising constructivism and critical realism: Towards critical pluralism. World Views and the Problem of Synthesis (1999) (Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 187–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J. The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and Systems. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2000a) 51(11):1256–1270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J. Variety is the spice of life: Combining soft and hard OR/MS methods. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. (2000b) 7:673–691Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J. What is it to be critical? Teaching a critical approach to management undergraduates. Management Learning (2000c) 31(2):219–237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J., Brocklesby J. Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega (1997) 25(5):489–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J., Gill A.Multimethodology: Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies (1997) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K) Google Scholar
• Mingers J., Stowell F.Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? (1997) (McGraw-Hill, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations (1983) (Prentice Hall, N.J) Google Scholar
• Myers D. Dialectical hermeneutics: A theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems. Inform. Systems J. (1994) 5:51–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nandhakumar J., Jones M. Too close for comfort? Distance and engagement in interpretive information systems research. Inform. Systems J. (1997) 7:109–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama O., Lee A. Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(June):145–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nissen H.-E., Klein H., Hirscheim R.Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (1991) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Nutt P. Influence of decision styles on use of decision models. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (1979) 14:77–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nutt P. Decision style and its impact on managers and management. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (1986) 29:341–366Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W., Baroudi J. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(1):1–28Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W., Robey D. Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(2):143–169Link, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. Putting soft OR methods to work: Information systems strategy development at Sainsbury's. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1995) 46(3):277–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. Combining management consultancy and research. Omega Internat. J. Management Sci. (1996a) 24(1):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. Information systems strategy development at Sains-bury's supermarkets using “Soft“ OR. Interfaces (1996b) 26(1):102–130Link, Google Scholar
• Ormerod R. Putting soft OR methods to work—information systems strategy development at Richards Bay. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1996c) 47(9):1083–1097Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pepper S.World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence (1942) (University of California Press, CA) Google Scholar
• Porter M.Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Advantage (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Robey D. Diversity in information systems research: Threat, promise and responsibility. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):400–408Link, Google Scholar
• Sayer A.Method in Social Science (1992) (Poutledge, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Sillince J., Mouakket S. Varieties of political process during systems development. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(4):368–397Link, Google Scholar
• Slocum J. Does cognitive style affect diagnosis and interventions strategies of change agents? Group and Organ. Stud. (1998) 3(2):199–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smaling A. The pragmatic dimension: Paradigmatic and pragmatic aspects of choosing a qualitative or quantitative method. Quality and Quantity (1994) 28:233–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smithson S., Nissen H.-E., Klein H., Hirschheim R. Continuing different approaches. Inform. Systems. Res: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (1991) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 365–369Google Scholar
• Stumph S., Dunbar R. The effects of personality type on choices made in strategic decision situations. Decision Sci. (1991) 22:1047–1069Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tashakkori A., Teddlie C.Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (1998) (Sage Publications, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Taylor D., Tashakkori A. Towards an understanding of teachers' desire for participation in decision making. J. School Leadership (1997) 7:1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trauth E., Jessup L. Understanding computer-mediated discussions: Positivist and interpretive analyses of group support system use. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(March):43–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trauth E., O'Connor B., Nissen H.-E., Klein H., Hirscheim R. A study of the interaction between information technology and society: An illustration of combined qualitative research methods. Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (1991) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 131–143Google Scholar
• Ulrich W.Critical Heuristics of Social Planning (1994) (Wiley, Chichester, U.K) Google Scholar
• Walsham G. The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(4):376–394Link, Google Scholar
• Walsham G., Lee A., Liebenau J., DeGross J. Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects. Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997) (Chapman Hall, London, U.K.) 466–480Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weaver G., Gioia D. Paradigms lost: Incommensurability vs. structurationist inquiry. Organ. Stud. (1994) 15(4):565–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Work B., Mingers J., Stowell F. A new structure for liberal education. Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? (1997) (McGraw Hill, London, U.K.) 329–360Google Scholar