Research Report: Modifying Paradigms—Individual Differences, Creativity Techniques, and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation

References

• Ajzen I., Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M.The Social Psychology of Creativity (1983) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenbyand J., Herron M. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(5):1154–1184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. R.The Architecture of Cognition (1983) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Anderson J. R. Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psych. Rev. (1987) 92:192–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. R. Automaticity and the ACT* Theory. Amer. J. Psych. (1992) 105:165–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly T., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Sci. (1990) 36:689–703Link, Google Scholar
• Couger J. D.Creative Problem Solving and Opportunity Finding (1995) (Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company, Hinsdale, IL) Google Scholar
• Couger J. D., Higginsand L. F., McIntyre S. C. (Un)structured creativity in information systems organizations. Management Inform. Sci. Quart. (1993) 375–397Google Scholar
• Cowan D. A. Challenging the dichotomous interpretation of Jung's psychological functions. (1987) (Bloomington, IN). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Academy of ManagementGoogle Scholar
• De Bono E.Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step (1970) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Aronson J. E., Heninger W. G., Walker II E. Structuring time and task in electronic brainstorming. MIS Quart. (1999) 23:95–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Glynn M. A., Kazanjian R. K. Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(2):286–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elam J., Mead M. Can software influence creativity? Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(1):1–22Link, Google Scholar
• Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psych. Rev. (1974) 81(1):59–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford C. M. Theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:1112–1142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furnham A. The big five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences (1996) 21(2):303–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallupe R. B., Dennis A. R., Cooper W. H., Valacich J. S., Bastianutti L. M., Nunamaker J. F. Electronic brainstorming and group-size. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:350–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gettys C. F., Fischer S. D. Hypothesis plausibility and hypothesis generation. Organ. Behavior & Human Performance (1979) 24:93–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guildford J. P. Creativity. Amer. Psych. (1950) 5:444–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gyrskiewicz S. S. Predictable Creativity. Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the Basics (1987) (Bearly Ltd., Buffalo, NY) Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Kaplan R. E. Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups. Decision Sci. (1974) 5:459–480Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellriegel D., Slocum H. W. J.Management: A Contingency Approach (1979) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. Cognitive style as a basis for MIS and DSS designs: Much ado about nothing? Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):567–579Link, Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. How to deal with cognitive style. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):153–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaksen S. B. An orientation to the frontiers of creativity research. Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the Basics (1987) (Bearly Limited, Buffalo) 1–31Google Scholar
• Isaksen S. B., Puccio G. J. Implications for problem solving groups of empirical research on ‘brainstorming’: A critical review of the literature. The Southern States Speech Comm. J. (1988) 43:327–356Google Scholar
• Jablin F. M., Seibold D. R. Implications for problem solving groups of empirical research on ‘brainstorming’: A critical review of the literature. The Southern States Speech Comm. J. (1978) 43:327–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jabri M. The development of conceptually independent sub-scales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Ed. and Psych. Measurement (1991) 51:975–983Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirton M. Adaptors and innovators—Description and measure. J. Appl. Psych. (1976) 61:622–629Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirton M., Kirton M. J. Adaptors and Innovators at Work. Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem Solving (1989) (Routledge, New York) 1–36Google Scholar
• Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Lorr M. An empirical evaluation of the MBTI Typology. Personality and Individual Differences (1991) 12(11):1141–1145Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon K. R., Wagner C. Stimulating ideas through creativity software. Management Sci. (1994) 40(11):1514–1532Link, Google Scholar
• Marakas G. M., Elam J. J. Creativity enhance in problem solving through software or process? Management Sci. (1997) 43(8):1136–1145Link, Google Scholar
• Massetti B. An empirical examination of the value of creativity support systems on idea generation. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(1):83–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae R., Costa P. Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicators from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. J. Personality (1989) 57(1):17–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E., Magrath J. E. Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. Judgement Calls in Research (1982) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 69–80Google Scholar
• Miller W. C.The Creative Edge (1987) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Mumford M. D., Gustafson S. B. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers I. B., Briggs K. C.Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (1952) (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) Google Scholar
• Myers I. B., McCaulley M. H.Manual. A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (1985) (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) Google Scholar
• Myers I. B.Introduction to Type: A Description of the Theory and Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (1987) (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) Google Scholar
• Nagasundaram M., Dennis A. R. When a group is not a group—The cognitive foundation of group idea generation. Small Group Res. (1993) 24:463–489Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham G. R., Cummings A. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:607–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn A. F.Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking (1953) (New York)Google Scholar
• Payne R., Lane D., Jabri M. A two dimensional person-environment fit analysis of the performance, effort, and satisfaction of research scientists. Brit. J. Management (1990) 1:45–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad A. Cognitive process as a basis for MIS and DSS design. Management Science (1987) 33(2):139–148Link, Google Scholar
• Rao H. R., Varghese S. J., Lin F. Hemispheric specialization, cognitive differences, and their implications for the design of decision support systems. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):145–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D. Cognitive style and DSS design: A comment on Huber's paper. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):580–582Link, Google Scholar
• Robey D. More ado about cognitive style and DSS design. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):151–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruble T. L., Cosier R. A. Effects of cognitive styles and decision setting on performance. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Proc. (1990) 46:283–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Satzinger J. W., Garfield M. J., Nagasundaram M. The creative process: The effects of group memory on individual idea generation. J. Management Inform. Systems (1999) 15(4):143–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott S. G., Bruce R. A. Determinants of innovative behavior—a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:580–607Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G. Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups—A thought experiment. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Proc. (1992) 52:156–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stepanek M. Using the net for brainstorming. Business Week (1999) . Dec. 13Google Scholar
• VanDyne L., Saavedra R. A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects on divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work-groups. Brit. J. Soc. Psych. (1996) 35:151–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• VanGundy A. B.Techniques of Structured Problem Solving (1988) (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York) Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Ungson G. R. Organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:57–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wierenga B., Van Bruggen G. H. The dependent variable in research into the effects of creativity support systems: Quality and quantity of ideas. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(1):81–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodman R. W., Sawyer J. E., Griffin R. W. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:293–321Crossref, Google Scholar