Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures

References

  • Abbot A.The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (1988) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow H., McGrath J. E., Berdahl J. L.Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation (2000) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumgartel H., Sobol R. Background and organizational factors in absenteeism. Personnel Psych. (1959) 12:431–443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baym N. Interpreting soap operas and creating community: Inside a computer-mediate fan culture. J. Folklore Res. (1993) 30:143–176[Also appears in S. Kiesler (Eds.), Culture of the Internet]Google Scholar
  • Berthod M., Sudweeks F., Newton S., Coyne R., Rafaeli S., Sudweeks F., McLaughlin M. “It makes sense”: Using an autoassociative neural network to explore typicality in computer mediated discussions. Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet (1996) (AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 191–220Google Scholar
  • Bonito J. A., Hollingshead A. B., Burelson B. R. Participation in small groups. Communication Yearbook 20 (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. CA) Google Scholar
  • Bonner H.Group dynamics: Principles and applications (1959) (Ronald, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bossard J. H. Law of family interaction. Amer. J. Soc. (1945) 50:292–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brinthaupt T. M., Moreland R. L., Levine J. M. Sources of optimism among prospective group members. Personality and Social Psych. Bull. (1991) 17(1):36–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler B. S.The dynamics of cyberspace: Examining and modeling online social structure (1999) (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA) . Phd DissertationGoogle Scholar
  • Cartwright D., Cartwright D., Zander A. The nature of group cohesiveness. Group Dynamics: Research and Theory (1968) 3rd Edition(Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cleland S.Influence of Plant Size on Industrial Relations (1955) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Connolly T., Kiesler S. Electronic brainstorming: Science meets technology in the group meeting room. Culture of the Internet (1997) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:119–135LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Where are the theories for the “New” organizational forms? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(4):i–viGoogle Scholar
  • Davidow W., Malone M.The Virtual Corporation (1992) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
  • Davies S. Choosing between concentration indices: the Iso-concentration curve. Economica (1988) 46:67–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diehel M., Strobe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Towards the solution of a riddle. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1987) 53:497–509CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feld S. Structural determinants of similarity among associates. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1982) 47:797–801CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fine G. A., Stoecker R., Lawler E. Can the circle be unbroken? Small groups and social movements. Advances in Group Processes 1 (1985) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–28Google Scholar
  • Finholt T., Sproull L. Electronic groups at work. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1:41–64LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Forsyth Danelson R.Group Dynamics (1990) 2nd. Ed(Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
  • Fulk J., Flanagin A. J., Kalman M. E., Monge P. R., Ryan T. Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Commun. Theory (1996) 6(1):60–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furlong M. S. An electronic community for older adults: The SeniorNet network. J. Commun. (1995) 39(3):145–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1993) 2nd Ed(Macmillan Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hagel J., Armstrong A. G.net.gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hare A. P.Handbook of Small Group Research (1976) 2nd Ed(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Haveman H. A. Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(1):20–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiltz S. R.Online Communities: A Case Study of the Office of the Future (1985) (Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hirschman A. O. The paternity of an index. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1964) 54(5):761Google Scholar
  • Hof R. D., Browder S., Elstrom P. Internet communities. Bus. Week (1997) May5Google Scholar
  • Homans G. C.The Human Group (1950) (Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York) Google Scholar
  • Indik B. P. Organization size and member participation: Some empirical tests of alternative explanations. Human Relations (1965) 18:339–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James J. The distribution of free-forming small group size. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1953) 18:569–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaufer D. S., Carley K. M.Communication at a Distance: The Influence of Print on Sociocultural Organization and Change (1993) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • King S. Analysis of electronic support groups for recovering addicts. Interpersonal Comput. Tech. (1994) 2(3):47–56Google Scholar
  • Kraut R. E., Attewell P.Electronic mail and organizational knowledge (1993) (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut R. E., Scherlis W., Mukhopadhyay T., Manning J., Kiesler S. The HomeNet field trial of residential internet services. Commun. ACM (1996) 39(12):55–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krech D., Crutchfield R. S.Theory and Problems of Social Psychology (1948) (McGraw Hill, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipnack J., Stamps J.Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Malone T., Yates J., Benjamin R. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies: Effects of information technology on market structure and corporate strategies. Commun. ACM (1987) 30(6):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L., Fulk J., Steinfield C. Toward a “Critical Mass” theory of interactive media. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 194–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L., Connolly T. Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the adoption of interdependent work tools. Proc. Conf. Computer Supported Work (1990) (Association for Computer Machinery, New York) 371–380Google Scholar
  • Marwell G., Oliver P.The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClelland D. C. How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. Amer. Psych. (1985) 40:812–825CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCormick N., McCormick J. Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates' electronic mail. Comput. in Human Behavior (1992) 8:379–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M. The size of voluntary organizations. Social Forces (1983) 61(4):1045–1064Google Scholar
  • McPherson M., Singh J. V. Evolution in communities of voluntary organizations. Organizational Evolution New Directions (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 224–245Google Scholar
  • McPherson M., Rotolo Thomas. Testing a dynamic model of social comparison: Diversity and change in voluntary groups. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1996) 61:179–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer G. R.The social organization of the computer underground (1989) (Northern Illinois University, Dekalb, IL) . Master's thesisGoogle Scholar
  • Milgram S., Bickman L., Berkowitz L. Note on the drawing power of crowds of different sizes. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1969) 13:79–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Berkowitz L. Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group interactions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1982) 15(Academic Press, New York) 137–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Wingert M. L., Witte E. H., Davis J. H. Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. Understanding Group Behavior (1996) 2(Small Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 11–35Google Scholar
  • Nunamaker J. F., Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S., Vogel D. R., George J. F. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Commun. ACM (1991) 34:40–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ogan C. Listserver communication during the Gulf War: What kind of medium is the Bulletin Board?. J. Broadcasting and Electronic Media (1993) 37(2):177–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson M.The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (1965) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osborn A. F.Applied Imagination (1957) (Scribner, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ostrom E.Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action (1990) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petty R. E., Harkins S. G., Williams K. D., Latané B. The effects of group size on cognitive effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psych. Bull. (1977) 3:579–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter L. W., Lawler E. E. Properties of organization structure in relation to job attitudes of job behavior. Psych. Bull. (1965) 64:23–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rafaeli S., LaRose R. J. Electronic bulletin boards and ‘public goods’ explanations of collaborative mass media. Commun. Res. (1993) 20(2):177–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rheingold H.The Virtual Community (1993) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Burgoon M. Communication networking in computer-conferencing systems: A longitudinal study of group roles and system structure. Communication Yearkbook (1982) 6(Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 925–944CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Schement J., Lievrouw L. New patterns of social structure in an information society. Competing Visions, Complex Realities: Social Aspects of the Information Society (1987) (Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 107–120Google Scholar
  • Rice R. E. Computer-mediated communication system network data: Theoretical concerns and empirical examples. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1990) 32:627–647CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Love G. Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Commun. Res. (1987) 14(1):85–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts T. L. Are newsgroups virtual communities?. Proc. CHI'98 (1998) April(Los Angeles, CA)18–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Boudreau M. Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):167–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rubenstein C. M., Shaver P., Hartog J., Audy R. Loneliness in two northeastern cities. The Anatomy of Loneliness (1980) (International Universities Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems (1992) 3rd Ed(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Shaw M. E.Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior (1981) 3rd ed(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A., Bonini B. On the size distribution of business firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1958) 607–617Google Scholar
  • Slater P. E. Contrasting correlates of group size. Sociometry (1958) 21:129–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sproull L., Kiesler S.Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (1990) (MIT Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Stogdill R. M.Individual Behavior and Group Achievement (1959) (Oxford, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thorn B. K., Connolly T., Fulk J., Steinfield C. Discretionary databases. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Thraser Fredric M.The Gang (1927) (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Turoff M. Computer-mediated communication requirements for group support. J. Organ. Computing (1991) 1:85–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walther J. B. Anticipated ongoing interaction vs. channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Commun. Res. (1994) 20(4):473–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walther J. B. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun. Res. (1996) 23(1):3–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wellman B. The place of kinfolk in community networks. Marriage and Family Rev. (1990) 15:195–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wellman B. Lay referral networks: Using conventional medicine and alternative therapies for low back pain. Soc. Health Care (1995) 12:213–238Google Scholar
  • Wellman B., Salaff J., Dimitrova D., Garton L., Gulia M., Haythornthwaite C. Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community. Annual Review of Sociology (1996) 22:213–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wellman B., Whortley S. Brothers' keepers: Situating kinship relations in broader networked of social support. Sociological Perspectives (1989) 32:273–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wellman B., Whortley S. Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. Amer. J. Soc. (1990) 96:558–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whittaker S. Talking to strangers: An evaluation of factors affecting electronic collaboration. Proc. CSCW'96 (1996) November(Boston, MA)16–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter D. G.The Power Motive (1973) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wittenbaum G. M., Stasser G., Nye J. L., Brower A. M. Management of information in small groups. What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 261–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.