Collaborative Decision Making: A Connectionist Paradigm for Dialectical Support

References

  • Barua A., Chellappa R., Whinston A. B. Design and implementation of internet and intranet based collaboratories. J. Electr. Comm. (1997) 1(2):32–58Google Scholar
  • Barua A., Chellappa R., Whinston A. B. Creating an MIS collaboratory in cyberspace: Theoretical foundations and an implementation. J. Organ. Comput. (1995) 5(4):417–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein B.Euclid: Supporting collaborative argumentation with hypertext (1992) (University of Colorado, Boulder, CO) . Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  • Bowers J. M., Benford S. D.Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Theory, Practice and Design (1991) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)Google Scholar
  • Cohen R. Analyzing the Structure of Argumentative Discourse. Comput. Linguistics (1987) 13(1):11–24Google Scholar
  • Cohen R., et al., Dahl V., Saint-Dizier P. On the semantics of natural language sentences in logic programming. Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming II (1988) (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Coopers and Lybrand Excellence in audit education. Case Material (1990) (Cooper and Lybrand, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dolan C., Smolensky P., Touretzky D., et al.Implementing a connectionist production system using tensor products (1988) Proc. 1988 Connectionist Summer School(Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA) 265–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellis C. A., Gibbs S. J., Rein G. L. Groupware: Some issues and experiences. CACM (1991) 34(1):38–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman J. A., Ballard D. H. Connectionist models and their properties. Cogn. Sci. (1982) 6:205–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman J. A. Special issue on connectionism. Cogn. Sci. (1985) 9(1Google Scholar
  • Fischer G., Lemke A. C., McCall R., Morch A. I. Making argumentation serve design. Human-Comput. Interaction (1991) 6:393–419CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fodor J. A., Pylyshyn Z. W. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cogn. (1988) 28:3–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gensler H. J.Symbolic Logic (1990) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Goldberg D., Oki B., Nichols D., Terry D. B. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. CACM (1992) 35(12):61–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenburg S.Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware (1991) (Academic Press, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Grief I.Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings (1988) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA) Google Scholar
  • Heckerman D.Probabilistic Similarity Networks (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hill W., Hollan J., Wrobleski D., McCandless T.Edit wear and read wear (1992) Proceedings of CHI '92, Human Factors in Computing Systems(ACM Press, New York) 3–9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hua G., Kimbrough S. On Hypermedia based argumentation decision support systems. Decision Support Systems (1998) 22:259–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S.Group Support Systems (1993) (McMillan Publishing Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Katzenbach J. R., Smith D. K.The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High Performance Organization (1993) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kimbrough S. O. A graph representation for management of logic models. Decision Support Systems (1986) 2(1):27–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin F., Shoham Y. Provably correct theories of action. J. Assoc. Comput. Machinery (1995) 42(2):293–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locks M. O. The logic of policy as argument. Management Sci. (1985) 31(1):109–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lorenzen P.Constructive Philosophy (1987) (University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lorenzen P.Formal Logic (1965) (Reidel Publishing Company, Dardrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Lorenzen P.Normative Logic and Ethics (1984) (Bibliographisches Institute, Mannheim/Wein/Zurich, B.I. Wissenschaftsverlag) Google Scholar
  • Loui R. P. Argument and Arbitration Games. Workshop on Computational Dialectics AAAI Conference (1994) 72–83Google Scholar
  • McRoy S. W., Ali S. S., Restificar A. C., Channarukul S. Building intelligent dialog systems. Intelligence (1999) 10(1CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyers R. A. Persuasive arguments theory: A test of assumptions. Human Comm. Res. (1989) 15(3):357–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitroff I. I., Mason R. O., Barabba V. P. Policy as argument-A logic for ill-structured decision problems. Management Sci. (1982) 28(12):1391–1404LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nunamaker J. F., Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S., Vogel D. R., George J. F. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. CACM (1991) July34(7):40–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nute D. Defeasible Reasoning and Decision Support Systems. Decision Support Systems (1988) 4(1):97–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nute D., Erk K. Defeasible logic graphs I: Theory. Decision Support Systems (1998) 22:277–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nute D., Henderson C., Hunter Z. Defeasible logic graphs II: Implementation. Decision Support Systems (1998) 22:295–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinkas G. Reasoning, nonmonotonicity and learning in connectionist networks that capture propositional knowledge. Artificial Intelligence (1995) 77:203–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollock J. L. A theory of defeasible reasoning. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems (1991) 6:33–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramesh R., Whinston A. B. Claims, arguments and decisions: Formalisms for representation, gaming and coordination. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(3):294–325LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Russel S., Norvig P.Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (1995) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sheth B., Maes P.Evolving Agents for Personalized Information Filtering (1993) Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Conference on Artficial Intelligence for ApplicationsCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun R. A new approach toward modeling causality in commonsense reasoning. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems (1995) 10:581–616CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson E. B., Strassmann P. A., et al. Business Value as Justificatory Argument. Measuring Business Value of Information Technologies (1988) (ICIT Press, International Center for Information Technologies, Washington, D. C.) 121–138Google Scholar
  • Thagard P. Explanatory Coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (1989) 12:435–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toulmin S.The Uses of Arguments (1958) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Toulmin S., Rieke R., Janik A.An Introduction to Reasoning (1979) (Macmillan, NY) Google Scholar
  • Vinokur A., Burnstein E. Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group induced shifts: A group problem-solving approach. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1974) 29:305–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vreeswijk G., Wagner G., Pearce D.Reasoning with defeasible arguments: Example and applications (1992) Proceedings of the European Workshop on Logic in AI(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg) 189–211JELIACrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.