Research Commentary: Workflow Management Issues in e-Business

References

• van der Aalst W. M. P. The application of petri nets to workflow management. J. Circuits, Systems Computers (1998) 8(1):21–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Aalst W. M. P. Loosely coupled inter-organizational workflows: Modeling and analyzing workflows crossing organizational boundaries. Inform. Management (2000) 37:67–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Aalst W. M. P. Workflow patterns. (2001) . 〈 http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/research/patterns/〉Google Scholar
• van der Aalst W. M. P., Kumar A. XML-based schema definition for support of inter-organizational workflow. . Forthcoming, Inform. Systems Res.Google Scholar
• van der Aalst W. M. P., Ter Hofstede A. H. M. Verification of workflow task structures: A petri-net-based approach. (2001) . Working paper, T. U. Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• van der Aalst W. M. P., Desel J., Oberweis A.Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, Lecture Notes in Computer Science1806(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ardhaldjian R., Fahner M. Using simulation in the business process reengineering effort. Indust. Engrg. (1994) 26(7):60–61Google Scholar
• Atluri V., Wei-kuang Huang. An extended petri net model for supporting workflows in a multilevel secure environment. (1996) . DBSec 240–258Google Scholar
• Atluri V., Wei-kuang Huang, Elisa Bertino. An execution model for multilevel secure workflows. (1997) . DBSec 151–165Google Scholar
• Baresi L., et al., Grefen, Pernici, Sanchez. Workflow design methodology. Database Support for Workflow Management: The WIDE Project (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers)47–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baskett F., Chandy K. M., Muntz R. R., Palacios F. G. Open, closed and mixed networks of queues with different classes of customers. J. Assoc. Comput. Machinery (1975) 22(2):248–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu A., Blanning R. W. Model integration using metagraphs. Inform. Systems Res. (1994a) 5(3):195–218Link, Google Scholar
• Basu A., Blanning R. W. Metagraphs: A tool for modeling decision support systems. Management Sci. (1994b) 40(12):1579–1600Link, Google Scholar
• Basu A., Blanning R. W. A formal approach to workflow analysis. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):17–36Link, Google Scholar
• Basu A., Blanning R. W. Workflow analysis using attributed metagraphs. (2001) Proc. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci.Maui, HICrossref, Google Scholar
• Basu A., Blanning R. W., Shtub A. Metagraphs in hierarchical modeling. Management Sci. (1997) 43(5):623–639Link, Google Scholar
• Bauer T., Dadam P. A distributed execution environment for large-scale workflow management systems with subnets and server migration. (1997) Proc. 2nd IFCIS Conf. Cooperative Inform. SystemsKiawah Island, SCCrossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudouin-Lafon M.Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Trends in Software Series 7 (1999) (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Berge C.Hypergraphs: Combinations of Finite Sets (1989) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Bertino E., Elena Ferrari, Atluri V. The specification and enforcement of authorization constraints in workflow management systems. TISSEC (1999) 2(1):65–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bussler C. Enterprise-wide workflow management. IEEE Concurrency (1999) 7(3):32–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bussler C., Jablonski S. Policy resolution for workflow management. (1995) Proc. 28th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci.Maui, HIGoogle Scholar
• Buzacott J. A. Commonalities in reengineered business processes models and issues. Management Sci. (1996) 42(5):768–782Link, Google Scholar
• Buzacott J. A., Yao D. D. On queueing networks of flexible manufacturing systems. Queueing Systems (1986) 1:29–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casonato R. Production-class workflow: A view of the market. (1998) . Gartner Group Research Note 00057684Google Scholar
• Castano S., Fugini M. Rules and patterns for security in workflow systems. (1999) DBSec Conf.Chalkidiki, Greece:59–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceri S., Grefen P., Sanchez G. WIDE-A distributed architecture for workflow management. (1997) Proc. 7th Internat. Workshop on Res. Issues in Data Engrg.Birmingham, U. K.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christophides V., Hull R., Kumar A., Simeon J. Workflow mediation using VorteXML. IEEE Data Engrg. Bull. (2001) 24(1):40–45Google Scholar
• Chrysanthis P., Ramamritham K. Synthesis of extended transaction models using ACTA. ACM Trans. Database Systems (1994) 19(3):450–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desel J., Esparaza J.Free Choice Petri Nets, Volume 40: Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science (1995) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijk N. M.Queueing Networks and Product Forms: A Systems Approach (1993) (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Ellis C., Beaudouin-Lafon M. Workflow technology. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Trends in Software Series (1999) 7(John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.) 29–54Google Scholar
• Ellis C., Huang J. A comparison of workflow modeling formalisms. (1997) Proc. 35th ACM Southeast Conf. Apr. 11.Google Scholar
• Ellis C., Nutt G. Office information systems and computer science. ACM Comput. Surveys (1980) 12(1):27–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraiolo D. F., Kuhn D. R. Role-based access control. (1992) 15th National Comput. Security Conf.NIST/NSA:554–563Google Scholar
• Ferraiolo D. F., Cugini J., Kuhn D. R. Role-based access control: Features and motivation. (1995) Annual Comput. Security Appl. Conf.(IEEE Computer Society Press)Google Scholar
• Fowler M., Scott K.UML Distilled (1997) (Addison-Wesley, New York) Google Scholar
• Gates W.Business @ The Speed of Thought: Succeeding in the Digital Economy (1999) (Time-Warner Books, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grefen P., Pernici B., Sanchez G.Database Support for Workflow Management: The WIDE Project (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Twenti, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grefen P., Aberer K., Hoffner Y., Ludwig H. CrossFlow: Cross-organizational workflow management in dynamic virtual enterprises. Internat. J. Comput. Systems Sci. Engrg. (2000) 15(5):277–290Google Scholar
• Hammer M., Champy J.Reengineering the Corporation (1993) (Nicolas Brealey Publishing, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Hansen G. A.Automated Business Process Reengineering: Using the Power of Visual Simulation Strategies to Improve Performance and Profit (1997) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hartmann P., Studt R., Wewers T. A framework for classifying interorganizational workflow-controlled business processes focusing on quality management. (2001) Proc. 34th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci.Maui, HawaiiCrossref, Google Scholar
• Herring C., Milosevic Z. Implementing B-2-B contracts using BizTalk. (2001) Proc. 34th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci.Maui, HawaiiCrossref, Google Scholar
• Hull R., et al. Declarative workflows that support easy modification and dynamic browsing. (1999) Conf. Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration (WACC)San Francisco, CA:69–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jablonski S., Bussler C.Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture, and Implementation (1996) (International Thomson Computer Press, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Johansson H. J., McHugh P., Pendlebury A. J., Wheeler W. A.Business Process Reengineering: Breakpoint Strategies for Market Dominance (1993) (Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Kaplan S., Sawhney M. e-Hubs: The new B-2-B marketplaces. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(3):97–103Google Scholar
• Kim K. Architectures for very large scale workflow management systems. (1998) (Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO) . Ph. D. thesisGoogle Scholar
• Klein M., Dellarocas C. Aknowledge-based approach to handling exceptions in workflow systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2000) 9(3-4):399–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinrock L.Queueing Systems, vol. 1: Theory (1975) (Wiley-Interscience, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Kumar A., Zhao L. Dynamic routing and operational controls in a workflow management system. Management Sci. (1999) 45(2Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar A., Zhao L. Workflow support for electronic commerce applications. Decision Support Systems (2001) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Kumar A., van der Aalst W. M. P., Verbeek H. M. W. Dynamic work distribution in workflow management systems: How to balance quality and performance? J. Management Inform. SystemsForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Lai K. Y., Malone T. W., Yu K-C. Object lens: A "spreadsheet" for cooperative work. ACM Trans. Office Inform. Systems (1988) 6(4):332–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P.Workflow Handbook 1997 (1997) (Workflow Management Coalition, John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Lenz K., Oberweis A. Modeling inter-organizational workflows with XML nets. (2001) Proc. 34th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci.Maui, HIGoogle Scholar
• Leymann F., Roller D.Production Workflow, Concepts and Techniques (2000) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Lindert F., Deiters W. Modeling inter-organizational processes with process model fragments. (1999) Proc. Workshop on Enterprise-wide and Cross-Enterprise Workflow Management.Paderborn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Luqi. A graph model for software evolution. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1990) 16(8):917–927Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T., Grant K., Turbak F., Brobst S., Cohen M. Intelligent information-sharing systems. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(5):390–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manganelli R. L., Klein M. K.The Reengineering Handbook: A Step-by-Step Guide to Business Transformation (1996) (Amacom, New York) Google Scholar
• March S., Hevner A., Ram S. Research commentary: An agenda for information technology research in heterogeneous and distributed environments. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):327–341Link, Google Scholar
• McCarthy D. R., Dayal U. The architecture of an active database system. (1989) Proc. ACM SIGMOD Conf. Management of DataPortland, OR:215–224Google Scholar
• Morris D., Brandon J.Reengineering Your Business (1993) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• zur Mühlen M., Becker, Zur Mühlen, Rosemann. Resource modeling in workflow applications. (1999a) Proc. 1999 Workflow Management Conf.November 9thMünster, Germany:137–153Google Scholar
• zur Mühlen M. Evaluation of workflow management systems using meta models. (1999b) Proc. 32nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. on System SciencesMaui, HICrossref, Google Scholar
• Murata T. Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proc. IEEE (1989) 77(4):541–580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyanchama M., Osborn S. L. The role graph model and conflict of interest. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security (1999) 2(1):3–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poyssick G., Hannaford S.Workflow Reengineering (1996) (Adobe Press, Mountain View, CA) Google Scholar
• Reichert M., Bauer T., Dadam P. Enterprise-wide and cross-enterprise workflow management: Challenges and research issues for adaptive workflows. (1999) (Workshop Informatik '99, Paderborn, Germany) Google Scholar
• Reijers H. A., van der Aalst W. M. P. Short-term simulation: Bridging the gapbetween operational control and strategic decision making. (1999) Proc. IASTED Internat. Conf. on Modeling and Simulation(IASTED/Acta Press, Anaheim, CA) 417–421Google Scholar
• Reisig W., Rozenberg G.Lectures on Petri Nets I: Basic Models, vol. 1491 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (1998) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross S. M.A Course in Simulation (1990) (Collier Macmillan, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Rusinkiewicz M., Sheth A., Kim W. Specification and execution of transactional workflows. Modern Database Systems: The Object Model Interoperability, and Beyond (1995) (ACM Press, Cambridge, MA) 592–620Google Scholar
• Saastamoinen H. On the handling of exceptions in information systems. (1995) (University of Jyvaskyla, Finland) . Ph. D. thesisGoogle Scholar
• Sandhu R. S., Bhamidipati V., Manuawer Q. The ARBAC97 model for role-based administration of roles. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security (1999) 2(1):105–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandhu R. S., Coyne E. J., Feinstein H. L., Youman C. E. Role-based access control models. IEEE Comput. (1996) 29(2):38–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheth A., van der Aalst W., Arpinar I. Processes driving the networked economy. IEEE Concurrency (1999) 7(3):18–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon R., Mary Ellen Zurko. Separation of duty in role-based environments. (1997) Proc. 10th Comput. Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW '97)Rockport, MA:183–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• StaffwareStaffware GWD Procedure's Guide, Version 8, Issue 2 (1999) (Staff-ware plc, Berkshire, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Strong D. Decision support for exception handling and quality control in office operations. Decision Support Systems (1992) 8(3):217–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• SWAP Working Group Requirements for simple workflow access protocol. (1998) . Internet draft, SWAP Working Group, 〈 http://www.ics.uci.edu/~ietfswap〉, NovemberGoogle Scholar
• UDDI (2000) September). UDDI technical white paper, available at 〈 uddi.org〉Google Scholar
• Wächter H., Reuter A., Elmagarmid A. The ConTract model. Database Transaction Models for Advanced Applications (1991) (Morgan-Kauffman, San Mateo) Google Scholar
• WFMC Interface 1: Process definition interchange process model. (1999) . 〈 http://www.wfmc.org〉Google Scholar
• Winograd T., Flores F.Understanding Computers and Cognition (1987) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Wirth N. What can we do about the unnecessary diversity of notation for syntactic definitions. Comm. ACM (1977) 20(11):822–823Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wise R., Morrison D. Beyond the exchange: The future of B2B. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(6):86–96Google Scholar
• Wu S., Sheth A., Miller J. Task and role combined access control model for workflow systems. (2000) . Technical report, University of Georgia, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
• Zapf M., Heinzl A. Evaluation of generic process design patterns: An experimental study. Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, vol. 1806 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2000) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 83–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zisman Michael D. Representation, specification, and automation of office procedures. (1977) (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) . Ph. D. thesisGoogle Scholar