An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.36.97

References

  • Anderson J. C., Gerbing S. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(3):411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R., Yi Y., Phillips L. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(3):421–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler P. M., Bonnet D. G. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psych. Bull. (1980) 88(3):588–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K. A., Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psych. Bull. (1991) 110(2):305–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bush A. J., Hair J. F. An assessment of the mall intercept as a data collection method. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(May):158–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W. Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. (1998) 21(1):vii–xviGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Newstead P. R. The importance of specification in causal modeling: The case of end-user computing satisfaction. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(1):73–81LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Todd P. A. On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):237–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. J. How did they get my name?: An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(3):341–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. J., Armstrong P. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):105–121LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Xia W. A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: A replication. J. End-User Comput. (1997) 9(2):24–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Equifax Inc. 1990. The Equifax Report on Consumers in the Information Age. 1991. Harris-Equifax Consumer Privacy Survey. 1992. Harris-Equifax Survey. 1993. Harris-Equifax Health Information Privacy Survey. 1994. Harris-Equifax Consumer Privacy SurveyGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(February):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heinssen R. K., Glass C. R., Knight L. A. Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Comput. Human Behavior (1987) 3(2):49–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman Novak, Peralta. Information privacy in the market-space: Implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the web. Inform. Society (1999) 15(4):129–139Google Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Dickson G. W., DeSanctis G. Methodological issues in experimental IS research: Experiences and recommendations. MIS Quart. (1985) 9(2):141–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joreskog K. G., Sorbom D.LISREL VIII User's Guide (1991) (Scientific Software Inc., Mooresville, IN) 63–89Google Scholar
  • Klenke K. Construct measurement in management information systems: A review and critique of user satisfaction and user involvement instruments. INFOR (1992) 30(4):325–348Google Scholar
  • Law K. S., Wong C., Mobley W. H. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):741–755CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsh H. W., Hocevar D. A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (1985) 73(1):107–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason R. O. Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quart. (1986) 10(1):4–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parasuraman S., Igbaria M. An examination of gender differences in the determinants of computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers among managers. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1990) 2(3):327–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segars A. H. Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement scales: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega (1997) 25(1):107–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segars A. H., Grover V. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(4):517–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith H. J., Milberg S. J., Burke S. J. Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):167–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steiger J. H., Shapiro A., Browne M. W. On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika (1985) 50(3):253–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone E. F., Gardner D. G., Gueutal H. G., McClure S. A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations. J. Appl. Psych. (1983) 68(3):459–468CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D. W. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(2):146–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N. Performance implications of strategic co-alignment: A methodological perspective. J. Management Stud. (1990) 27(2):19–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.