Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96

References

  • Adams D. A., Nelson R. R., Todd P. A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quart. (1992) 16:227–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(May):411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong J., Overton T. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14:396–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey J. E., Pearson S. W. Developmentof a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Sci. (1983) 29(May):530–545LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey K. D.Methods of Social Sciences Research (1978) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ballantine J., Bonner M., Levy M., Martin A., Munro I., Powell P. L. The 3-D model of information systems success: The search for the dependent variable continues. Inform. Resources Management J. (1996) 9(4):5–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baroudi J. J., Orlikowski W. J. A short-form measure of user information satisfaction: A psychometric evaluation and notes on use. J. Management Inform. Systems (1988) 4(Spring):44–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler P. M., Bonett D. G. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. (1980) November):588–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau M., Gefen D., Straub D. W. Validation in IS research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Browne M. W., Cudeck R., Bollen K. A., Long J. S. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models (1993) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 136–162Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Todd P. A. On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(June):237–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chou C. P., Bentler P. M., Hoyle R. H. Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 37–55Google Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(September):318–340Google Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(August):982–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The questfor the dependentvariable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(June):259–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Xia W., Torkzadeh G. A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(4):453–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans P., Wurster T. Blown to Bits. (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with observable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(February):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garrity E. J., Sanders G. L.Information Systems Success Measurement (1998a) (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garrity E. J., Sanders G. L., Gurnity E. J., Sanders G. L. Dimensions of information systems success. Information Systems Success Measurement (1998b) (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerbing D. W., Anderson J. C., Bollen K. A., Long J. S. Monte Carlo evaluations in goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Testing Structural Equation Models (1993) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 40–65Google Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Sci. (1995) 41(December):1827–1844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(June):213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (1995) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hartwick J., Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. (1994) 40(April):440–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hendrickson A. R., Glorfeld K., Cronan T. P. On the repeated test-retest reliability of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: A comment. Decision Sci. (1994) 25(4):655–667CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendrickson A. R., Massey P. D., Cronan T. P. On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(June):247–230Google Scholar
  • Hunton J. E., Flowers L., Sutton S. C. Information technology in accounting: Assessing the impact on accountants and organizations. Advances in Accounting Information Systems (1997) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 3–34Google Scholar
  • Igbaria M., Guimaraes T., Davis G. B. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 11(Spring):87–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ishman M., Garrity E. J., Sanders G. L. Measuring information success at the individual level in cross-cultural environments. Information Systems Success Measurement (1998) (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA) Google Scholar
  • Joreskog K. G., Sorbom D. LISREL VIII User's Reference Guide. (1993) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Kim K. K. User satisfaction: A synthesis of three different perspectives. J. Inform. Systems (1989) 3(Fall):1–12Google Scholar
  • Long J. S. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. (1983) (Sage Publications, New-bury Park, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCallum R. C., Hoyle R. H. Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. Structural Equation Modeling (1995) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 16–36Google Scholar
  • Magal S. R. A model for evaluating information center success. J. Management Inform. Systems (1991) 8(Summer):91–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsh H. W., Hocevar and D. Applications of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psych. Bull. (1985) 100(May):562–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsh H. W., Balla J. R., McDonald R. P. Goodness-of-fit-indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(March):391–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason R. O. Measuring information output: A communications systems approach. Inform. Management (1978) 1(5):219–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald R. P., Marsh H. W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psych. Bull. (1990) 107(March):247–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I., Kautz K., Pries-Heje J. Integrating diffusion of innovations and theory of reasoned action models to predict utilization of information technology by end-users. Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology (1996) (Chapman and Hall Publishers, London, U.K.) 132–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers B. L., Kappelman L. A., Prybutok V. R. A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: Toward a theory for information systems assessment. Inform. Resources Management J. (1997) 10(1):6–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Netemeyer R. G., Johnston M. W., Burton S. Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75(April):148–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rainer K. R., Watson H. J. The keys to executive information system success. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 12(Fall):83–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seddon P. B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(September):240–253LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seddon P. B., Kiew M. Y. A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean's model of IS success. (1994) Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems.Vancouver, Canada:99–110Google Scholar
  • Seddon P. B., Yip S. K. An empirical evaluation of user information satisfaction (UIS) measures for use with general ledger accounting software. J. Inform Systems (1992) 6(Spring):75–92Google Scholar
  • Segars A. H., Grover V. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(December):517–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shannon C. E., Weaver W.The Mathematical Theory of Communication (1949) (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) Google Scholar
  • Steiger J. H. Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (1990) 25(April):173–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D. W. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(2):147–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D. W., Moez L., Karahanna E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1328–1342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) June):144–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. L., Higgins C. A., Howell J. M. Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994) 10(Summer):167–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Torkzadeh G., Doll W. J. Test-retest reliability of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. Decision Sci. (1991) 22(1):26–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West S. G., Finch J. F., Curran P. J., Hoyle R. H. Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. Structural Equation Modeling (1995) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 56–75Google Scholar
  • Woodroof J., Kasper G. M., Garrity E. J., Sanders G. L. A conceptual development of process and outcome user satisfaction. Information Systems Success Measurement (1998) (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.