Group Polarization and Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Communication Cues, Social Presence, and Anonymity

References

• Argyris C.On Organizational Learning (1992) (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Baron R. S., Roper G. Reaffirmation of social comparison views of choice shifts: Averaging and extremity effects in an autokinetic situation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 33(5):521–530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhappu A. D., Griffith T. L., Northcraft G. B. Media effects and communication bias in diverse groups. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1997) 70(3):199–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blascovich J., Ginsburg G. P., Howe R. C. Blackjack and the risky shift, II: Monetary stakes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1975a) 11(3):224–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blascovich J., Ginsburg G. P., Veach T. L. A pluralistic explanation of choice shifts on the risk dimension. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1975b) 31(3):422–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(1):39–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown R.Social Psychology (1965) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Burnstein E., Brandstatter H., Davis J. H., Stocker-Kreichgauer G. Persuasion as argument processing. Contemporary Problems in Group Decision-Making (1982) (Academic Press, New York) 103–124Google Scholar
• Butler J. K., Crino M. D. Effects of initial tendency and real risk on choice shift. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1992) 53(1):14–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson J. R., Zmud R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):153–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cartwright D. S., Cartwright D. S., Tomson B., Schwartz H. The nature of gangs. Gang Delinquency (1975) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) 1–22Google Scholar
• Chidambaram L. Relational development in computersupported groups. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):143–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chidambaram L., Bostrom R. P. Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects. J. Organ. Comput. (1993) 3(4):443–470Google Scholar
• Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S.Community Conflict (1957) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Connolly T., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):689–703Link, Google Scholar
• Cook M., Lallijee M. Verbal substitutes for visual signals in interaction. Semiotica (1972) 6:212–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Trevino L. K. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(3):355–366Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis J. H. Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples, 1950-1990. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1993) 52(1):3–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Kinney S. T. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):256–274Link, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Nunamaker J. F., Vogel D. R. A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems. J. Management Inform. Systems (1990a) 7(3):107–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S., Nunamaker J. F. An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (1990b) 25(5):1049–1057Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickson G., Benbasat I. A programmatic approach to information systems research: An experimentalist's view. The Information Systems Research Challenge: Experimental Research Methods (1989) (Boston, MA)147–170Google Scholar
• Diener E., Fraser S., Beaman A. L., Kelem R. T. Effects of deindividuating variables on stealing by Halloween trick-ortreaters. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 33(2):178–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubrovsky V. J., Kiesler S. B., Sethna B. N. The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction (1991) 6(2):119–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• El-Shinnawy M., Vinze A. S. Polarization and persuasive argumentation: A study of decision making in group settings. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(2):165–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L., Riecken H. W., Schachter S.When Prophecy Fails (1956) (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fjermestad J., Hiltz S. R. An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. J. Management Inform. Systems (1999) 15(3):7–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fromkin H. Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. J. Personality Social Psych. (1970) 16(3):521–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• George J. F., Easton G. K., Nunamaker J. F., Northcraft G. B. A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(4):394–415Link, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Northcraft G. B. Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communication research. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):272–285Link, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Fuller M. A., Northcraft G. B. Facilitator influence in group support systems: Intended and unintended effects. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(1):20–36Link, Google Scholar
• Hart S. L., Boroush M., Enk G., Hornick W. Managing complexity through consensus mapping: Technology for the structuring of group decisions. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(3):587–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G.Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (1991) (McGraw Hill, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Howell J., Dorfman P., Kerr S. Moderator variables in leadership research. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11(1):88–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isenberg D. J. Group polarization: A critical review and metaanalysis. J. Personality Social Psych. (1986) 50(6):1141–1151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis I. L.Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management (1989) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Jessup L. M., Connolly T., Galegher J. The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quart. (1990) 14(3):313–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansen R., Sibbet D., Benson S., Martin A., Mittman R., Saffo P.Leading Business Teams: How Teams Can Use Technology and Process to Enhance Group Performance (1991) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Kaplan M. F. Discussion polarization effects in a modified jury decision paradigm: Informational influences. Sociometry (1977) 40(3):262–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil M., Tan B. C. Y., Wei K. K., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V., Wassenaar A. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(2):299–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keppel G.Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (1991) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Zubrow D., Moses A. M., Geller V. Affectin computer-mediated communication: An Experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Comput. Interaction (1985) 1(1):77–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latane B. The psychology of social impact. Amer. Psych. (1981) 36(4):343–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewicki R. J., Litterer R.Negotiation (1985) (Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• McCauley C. The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. J. Personality Social Psych. (1989) 57(2):250–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E.Groups: Interaction and Performance (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• McGuire T. W., Kiesler S. B., Siegel J. Group and computer mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1987) 52(5):917–930Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muehleman J. T., Bruker C., Ingram C. M. The generosity shift. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 34(3):344–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers D. G., Kaplan M. F. Group-induced polarization in simulated juries. Personality. Soc. Psych. Bull. (1976) 2(1):63–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H.Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs (1990) (Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Nunamaker J. F., Dennis A. R., George J. F., Valacich J. S., Vogel D. R. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(7):40–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paese P. W., Bieser M., Tubbs M. E. Framing effects and choice shiftin group decision making. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1993) 56(1):149–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt C. Another view of group polarizing: The ‘reasons for’ one-sided oral argumentation. Comm. Res. (1994) 21(5):625–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Jackson M. H., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Communication theory and group support systems. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives (1993) (Macmillan, New York) 281–293Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Holmes M., DeSanctis G. Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Sci. (1991) 37(8):926–953Link, Google Scholar
• Pruitt D. G. Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1971) 20(3):339–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajecki D. W. Group discussion and the polarization of attitudes. Attitudes, Themes and Advances (1990) (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA) 183–214Google Scholar
• Rice R. E.The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology (1984) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Rice R. E. Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Comm. Res. (1993) 19(4):451–484Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riley R. T., Pettigrew T. F. Dramatic events and attitude change. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 34(5):1004–1015Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik G. R., Staw B. M., Salancik G. R. Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. New Directions in Organizational behavior (1977) (St. Clair, Chicago, IL) 1–54Google Scholar
• Sanders G. S., Baron R. S. Is social comparison irrelevantfor producing choice shift? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1977) 13(4):303–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw M. E., Berkowitz L. Communication networks fourteen years later. Group Processes (1978) (Academic Press, New York) 351–362Google Scholar
• Short J., Williams E., Christie B.The Social Psychology of Telecommunication (1976) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S. B., McGuire T. W. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1986) 37(2):157–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32(11):1492–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Straub D., Karahanna E. Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):160–175Link, Google Scholar
• Tan B. C. Y., Wei K. K., Watson R. T. The equalizing impact of a group support system on status differentials. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1999) 17(1):77–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan B. C. Y., Wei K. K., Watson R. T., Clapper D. L., McLean E. R. Computermediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Sci. (1998) 44(9):1263–1278Link, Google Scholar
• Toch R.The Social Psychology of Social Movements (1965) (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN) Google Scholar
• Todd P., Benbasat I. Process tracing methods in decision support systems research: Exploring the black box. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(4):493–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trauth E. M., Jessup L. M. Understanding computermediated discussions: Positive and interpretive analyses of group supportsystem use. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):43–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valacich J. S., Dennis A. R., Connolly T. Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1994a) 57(3):448–467Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valacich J. S., Dennis A. R., Nunamaker J. F. Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Res. (1992) 23(1):49–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valacich J. S., George J. F., Nunamaker J. F., Vogel D. R. Physical proximity effects on computer-mediated group idea generation. Small Group Res. (1994b) 25(1):83–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vinokur A., Burnstein E. Effects of partially-shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group problem-solving approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1974) 29(2):305–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vinokur A., Burnstein E. Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion. Euro. J. Soc. Psych. (1978) 8(3):335–348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallach M. A., Kogan N., Bem D. J. Group influence on individual risk-taking. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1962) 65(2):75–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):186–203Link, Google Scholar
• Walton R. E., McKersie R. B.A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiation (1965) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Weisband S. P. Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1992) 53(3):352–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisberg S.Applied Linear Regression (1985) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Whyte G. Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: A prospect theory approach. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1993) 54(3):430–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiener M., Mehrabian A.Language Within Language: Immediacy, a Channel in Verbal Communication (1968) (Appleton Century Crofts, New York) Google Scholar
• Williams E. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psych. Bull. (1977) 84(5):963–976Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiseman D. B., Levin I. P. Comparing risky decision making under conditions of real and hypothetical consequences. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1996) 66(3):241–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yinon Y., Jaffe Y., Feshbach S. Risky aggression in individuals and groups. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1975) 31(5):808–815Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zigurs I., Poole M. S., DeSanctis G. A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(4):625–644Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuber J. A., Crott H. W., Werner J. Choice shift and group polarization: An analysis of the status of arguments and social decision schemes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 62(1):50–61Crossref, Google Scholar