Decentralized Mechanism Design for Supply Chain Organizations Using an Auction Market

References

  • Ahuja R. K., Magnanti T. L., Orlin J. B.Network Flows (1993) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Akerlof G. A. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84(3):488–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand K. S., Mendelson H. Information and organization for horizontal multimarket coordination. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1609–1627LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arntzen B. C., Brown G. G., Harrison T. P., Trafton L. L. Global supply chain management at Digital Equipment Corporation. Interfaces (1995) 25(1):69–93LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K., Block H. D., Hurwicz L. On the stability of the competitive equilibrium, II. Econometrica (1959) 27(1):82–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ba S., Stallaert J., Whinston A. B. Introducing a third dimension in decentralized information systems design: The case for incentive alignment. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(3):225–239LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos J. Y., Kemerer C. F. Recent applications of economic theory in information technology research. Decision Support Systems (1992) 8(5):365–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banks J., Ledyard J. O., Porter D. P. Allocating uncertain and unresponsive resources. Rand J. Econom. (1989) 20(1):1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benders J. F. Partitioning procedures for solving mixed variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik (1962) 4:238–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P. The auction algorithm for assignment and other network flow problems: A tutorial. Interfaces (1990) 20(4):133–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhatnagar R., Chandra P., Goyal S. K. Models for multi-plant coordination. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 67(1):141–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S., Mamer J. W. Competitive equilibrium in an exchange economy with indivisibilities. J. Econom. Theory (1997) 74(2):385–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown G. G., Graves G. W., Honczarenko M. C. Design and operation of a multicommodity production/distribution system using primal goal decomposition. Management Sci. (1987) 33(11):1469–1480LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Mendelson H. Information systems and the organization of modern enterprises. J. Organ. Comput. (1993) 3(3):245–255Google Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Malone T. W., Gurbaxani V., Kambil A. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1628–1644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Company overviewCapacityweb.com (2000) . See: http://〈www.capacityweb.com〉Google Scholar
  • CRA Simultaneous ascending auction with package bidding. (1998) . CRA Report (CRA No. 1351–00), Charles River Associates, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K., Malone T. Information technology and work organization. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (1988) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dantzig G. B., Wolfe P. Decomposition principles for linear program. Oper. Res. (1960) 8(1):101–111LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T. H.Process Innovation (1993) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Davenport T. H. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) July—August):121–131Google Scholar
  • Davenport T. H., Short J. E. The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Rev. (1990) 31(4):11–27Google Scholar
  • Davenport T. H., Stoddard D. B. Reengineering: Business change of mythic proportions? MIS Quart. (1994) 18(2):121–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Debreu G.Theory of Value (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Gallupe B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Sci. (1987) 33(5):589–609LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dirickx Y. M., Jennergren L. P.Systems Analysis by Multilevel Methods (1979) (John Wiley, Chichester, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dogan K., Goetschalckx M. A primal decomposition method for the integrated design of multi-period production-distribution systems. IIE Trans. (1999) 31(11):1027–1036CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellis C. A., Gibbons R., Morris P. Groupware, some issues and experiences. (1991) 34(1):38–57Google Scholar
  • Fan M., Stallaert J., Whinston A.B. Creating electronic markets. Dr. Dobb's J. (1998) 23(11):52–57Google Scholar
  • Fan M., Stallaert J., Whinston A.B. The design and development of a financial cybermarket with a bundle trading mechanism. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (1999) 4(1):5–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan M., Stallaert J., Whinston A.B. The adoption and design methodologies of component-based enterprise systems. Eur. J. Inform. Sys. (2000) 9(1):25–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal T.Postoptimal Analyses, Parametric Programming, and Related Topics (1979) (McGraw-Hill International, New York) Google Scholar
  • Galbraith J.R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Galbraith J.R., Lawler E. E.Organizing for the Future (1993) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M., Graves G. W. Multicommodity distribution system design by Benders decomposition. Management Sci. (1974) 20(5):822–844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Halal W.The New Capitalism (1993) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hayek F. A. The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1945) 35(4):519–530Google Scholar
  • Hinkkanen A., Kalakota R., Saengcharoenrat P., Stallaert J., Whinston A. B., Kalakota R., Whinston A. B. Distributed decision support systems for realtime supply chain management. Reading in Electronic Commerce (1997) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Honczarenko M. Private communication. (1993) Google Scholar
  • Hurwicz L. The design of resource allocation mechanisms. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1973) 63(2):1–30Google Scholar
  • i2 Technologies, Inc. TradeMatrix sell solution. (2000) . White paper. i2 Technologies, Inc., Dallas, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Jennergren L. P., Muller W. Simulation experiments of resource-allocation decisions in two-level organizations. Soc. Sci. Res. (1973) 2:333–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King J. L. Centralized and decentralized computing: Organizational considerations and management options. Comput. Surveys (1983) 15(4):319–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ledyard J. O., Olson M., Porter D., Swanson J. A., Torma D. P. The first use of a combined value auction for transportation services. Interfaces (2002) 32(5):4–12LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lu X., McAfee R. P. The evolutionary stability of auctions over bargaining. Games Econom. Behavior (1996) 15(2):228–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Yates J., Benjamin R. I. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(6):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas-Colell A., Whinston M. D., Green J. R.Microeconomic Theory (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Analyzing the airwaves auction. J. Econom. Perspectives (1996) 10(1):159–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McBride R. D. Advances in solving the multicommodity-flow problem. Interfaces (1998) 28(1):32–41LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Meyerson R. B., Satterthwaite M. A. Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J. Econom. Theory (1983) 28:265–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts Milgrom P. J.Economics, Organization & Management (1992) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H.The Structure of Organations (1979) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Mohrman S. A., Galbraith J. R., Lawler E. E.Tomorrow's Organization (1998) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L.Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools and Processes (1988) (Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview, IL) Google Scholar
  • Nault B. R. Information technology and organization design: Locating decisions and information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(10):1321–1335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nisan N., Ronen A. Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms. Proc. 2nd ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2000) 242–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Hofman J. D. An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technologies. Sloan Management Rev. (1997) 38(2):11–21Google Scholar
  • Parkes D. C., Ungar L. H. Iterative combinatorial auctions: Theory and practice. Proc. AAAI-2000 (2000) (Austin, TX)74–81Google Scholar
  • Rassenti S. J., Smith V. L., Bulfin R. L. A combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):402–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H., Pekec A., Harstad R. M. Computationally manageable combinational auctions. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1131–1147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson P. A. Complementarity: An essay on the 40th anniversary of the hicks-allen revolution in demand theory. J. Econom. Literature (1974) 12(4):1255–1289Google Scholar
  • Sandholm T. An implementation of the contract net protocol based on marginal cost calculations. Proc. 11th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-1993) (1993) (Washington, D.C.)256–262Google Scholar
  • Sandholm T. Approaches to winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Decision Support Systems (2000) 28(1–2):165–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sikora R., Shaw M. J. A multi-agent framework for the coordination and integration of information systems. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):S65–S78LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stallaert J. Shadow prices and post-optimality analysis for degenerate linear programs using a pivoting algorithm. (2001) . Working paper, Electronic Economy Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Stoddard D. B., Jarvenpaa S. L. Business process redesign: Tactics for managing radical change. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 12(1):81–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan J. C., Harker P. T. Designing workflow coordination: centralized versus market-based mechanisms. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):328–342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H. Mechanism design for computerized agents. (1995) . Presented at theUsenix Workshop on Electronic Commerce, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Vohra R. V., Vries S. Combinatorial auctions:Asurvey. (2000) . Working paper, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Winograd T., Flores F.Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design (1986) (Ablex, Norwood, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.