Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption

References

  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sci (1997) 28:557–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I., Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Andreoli V., Worschel S. Effects of media, communicator, and message position on attitude change. Public Opinion Quart. (1978) 42:59–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ausubel D. P.The Psychology of Meaningful Learning (1963) (Grune and Stratton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bailey J. E., Pearson S. W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):530–545LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social-psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billings R. S., Wroten S. P. Use of path analysis in industrial/organizational psychology: Criticisms and suggestions. J. Appl. Psych. (1978) 63:677–688CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:40–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1980) 39(5):752–766CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaiken S., Eagly A. H. Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1976) 34:605–614CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaiken S., Maheswaran D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1994) 66(3):460–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):119–135LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T. H., Prusak L.Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Kinney S. T. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):256–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eagly A. H., Chaiken S.The Psychology of Attitudes. (1993) . Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrlich K., Cash D. Credibility, trust and information filtering. (1996) . Lotus Development Corporation PublicationGoogle Scholar
  • Ellis B. H. The effects of uncertainty and source credibility on attitudes about organizational change. Management Comm. Quart. (1992) 6(1):34–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman J. M., Lynch J. G. Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. J. Appl. Psych. (1988) 73:421–435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishbein M., Azjen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fulk J. Social construction of communication technology. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:921–950CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gergen K.Toward Transformation of Social Knowledge (1982) (Spriger-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A., Govindarajan V. Determinants of knowledge out-flows from and inflows into foreign subsidiaries in multinational corporations. (1996) . Working paper, Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey N., Harries I. Fischer. Using advice and assessing its quality. Organ. Behaviors and Human Decision Process (2000) 81(2):252–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heesacker M., Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message relevant thinking. J. Personality (1983) 51:653–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hovland C. I. Changes in attitude through communication. J. Abnormal and Soc. Psych. (1951) 46:424–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hovland C. I., Janis I. L., Kelley H. H.Communication and Persuasion (1953) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C. K.Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (1990) (Sage Publications, Ltd., London, U.K.) . Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences Series 72Google Scholar
  • Jungermann H. Advice giving and taking. Proc. 32nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (1999) . (HICS-32), Maui, HI, IEEE, on CDROMCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karahanna E., Straub D., Chervany N. L. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):183–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiesler S., Sproull L. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:548–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee A. S. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(2):143–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt M., Mahowald R. Email usage and forecast analysis. (2001) . IDC Report #W25335Google Scholar
  • Mak B., Lyytinen K. A model to assess the behavioral impacts of consultative knowledge based systems. Inform. Process Management (1997) 33(4):539–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mak B., Schmitt B. H., Lyytinen K. User participation in knowledge update of expert systems. Inform. Management (1997) 32(2):55–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:502–527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGinnies E., Ward C. D. Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Soc. Psych. Bull. (1980) 6(3):467–472CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowen J. C., Wiener J. L., Joag S. An information integration analysis of how trust and expertise combine to influence source credibility and persuasion. Adv. Consumer Res. (1987) 14Google Scholar
  • Newell S. J. Developing a measurement scale and a theoretical model defining corporate credibility. (1993) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation Florida State University College of Business, Tallahassee, FLGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pallak S. R. Salience of a communicators' physical attractiveness and persuasion: A heuristic versus systematic processing interpretation. Soc. Cognition (1983) 2:122–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T.Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T., Goldman R. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1981) 41:847–855CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quinn J. B., Anderson P., Finkelstein S. Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74:71–80Google Scholar
  • Ratneshwar S., Chaiken S. Comprehension's role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 18:52–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E. Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(4):475–500LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rieh S. Y., Belkin N. J. Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WWW. Proc. ASIS Annual Meeting. (1998) 35:279–289Google Scholar
  • Short J. A., Williams E., Christie B.The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (1976) (Wiley International, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Sniezek J. A., Buckley B. Cueing and cognitive conflict judge-advisor decision making. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Process (1995) 62:159–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spradley J.The Ethnographic Interview (1979) (Holt Reinhart, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32(11):1492–1512LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stamm K., Dube R. The relationship of attitudinal components to trust in media. Comm. Res. (1994) 21(1):105–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):186–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walther J. P. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Comm. Res. (1992) 19(1):52–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner J. L., Mowen J. C. Source credibility: On the independent effects of trust and expertise. Adv. Consumer Res. (1986) 13:306–310Google Scholar
  • Worschel S., Andreoli V., Eason J. Is the medium the message? A study of the effects of media, communicator, and message characteristics on attitude change. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1975) 5:157–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu C., Shaffer D. R. Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1987) 52(4):677–688CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zack M. H. Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups. Inform. Systems Res. (1993) 4(3):207–239LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zack M. H., McKenney J. L. Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):394–422LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.