The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing

References

  • Asher H. B.Causal Modeling (1983) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baroudi J. J., Orlikowski W. J. The problem of statistical power in MIS research. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(1):87–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Lim L. The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Res. (1993) 24(4):430–462CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger P. L., Luckmann T.The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (1990) (Anchor Books, New York) . [1966]Google Scholar
  • Carlson J. R., Zmud R. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J (1999) 42(2):153–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approachfor measuring interaction effects:. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Inform. System (1996) 21–41Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption studyGoogle Scholar
  • Christie B.Human Factors of Information Technology in the Office (1985) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Davenport T. H., Beck J. C.The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business (2001) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R. Information processing in group decision making: You can lead a group to information but you can't make it think. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(4):433–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Kinney S. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):256–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Hilmer K., Taylor N. J. Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997–1998) 14(3):61–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fulk J., Schmitz J., Steinfield C., Fulk J., Steinfield C. A social influence model of technology use. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage, Newbury, Park, CT) 117–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallupe R. B., DeSanctis G. Computer-based support for group problem-finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quart (1988) 12(2):277–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garfinkel H.Studies in Ethnomethodology (1967) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gefen D., Straub D., Boudreau M. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. AIS (2000) 7(7):1–78Google Scholar
  • Gopal A., Prasad P. Understanding GDSS in symbolic context: Shifting the focus from technology to interaction. MIS Quart (2000) 24(3):509–546CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon M. E., Slade L. A., Schmitt N. The ‘Science of the sophomore’ revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11(1):191–207Google Scholar
  • Gordon M. E., Slade L. A., Schmitt N. Student guinea pigs: Porcine predictors and particularistic phenomena. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(1):160–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J. The college sophomore as guinea pig: Setting the record straight. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(1):157–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hightower R., Sayeed L. Effects of communication mode and prediscussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):451–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1996) 68(3):181–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B., McGrath J. E., Guzzo R. A., Salas E. Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 46–78Google Scholar
  • James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69(1):85–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janis I. L.Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management (1989) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Rao V. S., Huber G. P. Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment. MIS Quart (1988) 12(4):645–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keppel G.Design and Analysis (1982) 2nd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kock N. Can communication medium limitations foster better group outcomes? An action research study. Inform. Management (1998) 34(5):295–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee A. S. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(2):143–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim L., Benbasat I. A framework for addressing group judgment biases with group technology. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996-1997) 13(3):7–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lohmöller J.Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares (1989) (PhysicaVerlag, Heidelberg Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(4):502–527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McLeod P. L. Group support systems the discovery of hidden profiles. Annual Meeting of the Acad. Management (1997) . Presented at the Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Mennecke B., Valacich J. S. Information is what you make of it: The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality, and member perceptions. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 15(2):173–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Remus W. Graduate students a surrogates for managers in experiments on business decision making. J. Bus. Res. (1986) 14(1):19–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ricoeur P.From Text to Action (1991) (Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL) . [1981]Google Scholar
  • Saunders C. S., Miranda S. Information acquisition in group decision making. Inform. and Management (1998) 34(2):55–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultze U., Vandenbosch B. Information overload in a groupware environment: Now you see it, now you don't. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (1998) 8(2):127–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schutz A.Phenomenology of the Social World (1997) (Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL) . [1967]Google Scholar
  • Shapiro C., Varian H.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) . 9Google Scholar
  • Short J., Williams E., Christie B.The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (1976) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Shrout P. E., Fleiss J. L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych. Bull (1979) 86(2):420–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Karahanna E. Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):160–175LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thorngate W., Kieslered Sara. More than we can know: The attentional economics of internet use. Culture of the Internet (1997) (Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 296–297Google Scholar
  • Valacich J. S., Paranka D., George J. F., Nunamaker J. F. Communication concurrency and the new media: A new dimension for media richness. Comm. Res. (1993) 20(2):249–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warkentin M., Sayeed L., Hightower R. Virtual teams vs. face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(4):975–996CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson R. T., DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quart (1988) 12(3):463–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss E. A. Self-Assessment procedure XXII. Comm. ACM (1990) 33(11):110–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wold H., Wold H., Jöreskog K. Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction (II) (1982) (NorthHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 1–52Google Scholar
  • Zigurs I., Buckland B. K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quart. (1998) 12(4):313–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zigurs I., Poole M. S., DeSanctis G. L. A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(4):625–644CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.