Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition

References

  • Ackerman P. L. Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psych. Bull (1987) 102:3–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackerman P.L., Kanfer R., Goff M. Cognitive and noncognitive determinants and consequences of complex skill acquisition. J. Experimental Psych. Appl. (1995) 1:270–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart (2000) 24:665–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9:204–215LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Sambamurthy V., Stair R. M. Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy—An empirical assessment. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11:418–430LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alliger G. M., Tannenbaum S. I., Bennett W., Traver H., Shotland A. A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psych. (2000) 50:341–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. R. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psych. Rev. (1982) 89:369–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. R.Cognitive Psychology and its Implications (1985) 2nd ed.(Freeman, NY) Google Scholar
  • Baldwin T. T. Effects of alternative modeling strategies on outcomes of interpersonal-skills training. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77:147–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin T. T., Magjuka R. J., Loher B. T. The perils of participation: Effects of choice of training on trainee motivation and learning. Personnel Psych. (1991) 44:51–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bandura A.Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1997) (W. H. Freeman and Company, NY) Google Scholar
  • Bandura A. Personal communication. (2001) . April 9 2001Google Scholar
  • Barclay D., Higgins C., Thompson R. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Stud. (1995) 2:285–309Google Scholar
  • Barrick M. R., Mount M. K. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. (1991) 44:1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benbasat I.Laboratory Experiments in Information Systems with a Focus on Individuals: A Critical Appraisal (1989) 2(Harvard Business School, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bollen K. A., Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psych. Bull. (1991) 110:305–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolt M. A., Killough L. N., Koh H. C. Testing the interaction effects of task complexity in computer training using the social cognitive model. Decision Sci. (2001) 32:1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bostrom R. P., Olfman L., Sein M. K. The importance of learning style in end-user training. MIS Quart. (1990) 14:101–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau M., Gefen D., Straub D. W. Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. (2001) 25:1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke M. J., Day R. R. A cumulative study of the effectiveness of managerial training. J. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71:232–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannon-Bowers J. A., Rhodenizer L., Salas E., Bowers C. A. A framework for understanding pre-practice conditions and their impact on learning. Personnel Psych. (1998) 51:291–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cellar D. F., Wade K. Effect of behavior modeling on intrinsic motivation and script-related recognition. J. Appl. Psych (1988) 73:181–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Frye T. A.PLS-Graph (1998) . Version 2.91.03.04Google Scholar
  • Churchill G. A. J. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(Feb):64–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt J. A., Simmering M. J. Concientiousness, goal orientation, and motivation to learn during the learning process: A longitudinal study. J. Appl. Psych. (1998) 83:654–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt J. A., LePine J. A., Noe R. A. Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85:678–707CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6:118–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. (1995) 19:189–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A., Huff S. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quart. (1999) 23:145–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook T. D., Campbell D. T.Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (1979) (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart (1989) 13(3):319–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis S. A., Bostrom R. P. Training end users: An experimental investigation of the roles of the computer interface and training methods. MIS Quart (1993) 17:61–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Decker P. J. Effects of symbolic coding and rehearsal in behavior-modeling training. J. Appl. Psych. (1980) 65:627–634CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donovan J. J., Radosevich D. J. A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. J. Appl. Psych (1999) 84:795–805CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Driskell J. E., Willis R. P., Copper C. Effect of overlearning on retention. J. Appl. Psych (1992) 77:615–622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards J. R. Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organ. Res. Methods (2001) 4:144–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards J. R., Bagozzi R. P. On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psych. Bull. (2000) 5:155–174Google Scholar
  • Falk R. F., Miller N. B.A Primer for Soft Modeling (1992) (The University of Akron, Akron, OH) Google Scholar
  • Fornell C., Bookstein L. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19:440–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gagne R. M. Learning outcomes and their effects. Amer. Psych (1984) 39:377–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gattiker U. Computer skills acquisition: A review and future directions for research. J. Management (1992) 18:547–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Straub D. W., Boudreau M. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications AIS (2000) 4(7):1–76Google Scholar
  • Gist M. E. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12:472–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gist M. E., Rosen B., Schwoerer C. The influence of training method and trainee age on the acquisition of computer skills. Personnel Psych. (1988) 41:255–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gist M. E., Schwoerer C., Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74:884–891CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser R. The reemergence of learning theory within instructional research. Amer. Psych. (1990) 45:29–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hicks W. D., Klimoski R. J. Entry into training programs and its effects on training outcomes: A field experiment. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30:542–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Industry ReportTraining (2001) 38(10):40–75Google Scholar
  • Johnson R. D., Marakas G. M. The role of behavior modeling in computer skill acquisition—Toward refinement of the model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11:402–417LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kanfer R., Ackerman P. L. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. J. Appl. Psych. Monograph (1989) 74:657–690CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkpatrick D. Making it all worker-friendly. Fortune (1993) 128(7):44–53Google Scholar
  • Kline R. B.Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998) (Guilford Press, NY) Google Scholar
  • Kozlowski S. W. J., Gully S. M., Brown K. G., Salas E., Smith E. M., Nason E. R. Effects of training goals and goal orientation on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2001) 85:1–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraiger K., Ford J. K., Salas E. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78:311–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraiger K., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. Measuring knowledge organization as a method for assessing learning during training. Human Factors (1995) 37:804–816CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law K. S., Wong C., Mobley W. H. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:741–755CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee C., Bobko P. Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79:364–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim K. H., Ward L. M., Benbasat I. An empirical study of computer system learning: Comparison of co-discovery and self-discovery methods. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8:254–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E. A., Latham G. P.A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (1990) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Marakas G. M., Yi M. Y., Johnson R. D. The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9:126–163LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marcolin B. L., Compeau D. R., Munro M. C., Huff S. L. Assessing user competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11:37–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martocchio J. J. Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79:819–825CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martocchio J. J., Dulebohn J. Performance feedback effects in training: The role of perceived controllability. Personnel Psych. (1994) 47:357–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martocchio J. J., Judge T. A. Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. J. Appl. Psych. (1997) 82:764–773CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martocchio J. J., Webster J. Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psych. (1992) 45:553–578CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieu J. E., Martineau J. W., Tannenbaum S. I. Individual and situational influences on the development of self-efficacy: Implications for training effectiveness. Personnel Psych. (1993) 46:125–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • May G. L., Kahnweiler W. M. The effect of mastery practice design on learning and transfer in behavior modeling training. Personnel Psych. (2000) 53:353–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell T. R., Hopper H., Daniels D., George-Falvy J., James L. R. Predicting self-efficacy and performance during skill acquisition. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79:506–517CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C., Bernstein I. H.Psychometric Theory (1994) 3rd ed.McGraw-Hill, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Noe R. A. Trainees' attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11:736–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noe R. A., Schmitt N. The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psych (1986) 39:497–523CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olfman L., Bostrom R. P. End-user software training: An experimental comparison of methods to enhance motivation. J. Inform. Systems (1991) 1:249–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olfman L., Mandviwalla M. Conceptual versus procedural software training for graphical user interfaces: A longitudinal field experiment. MIS Quart. (1994) 18:405–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. The science of training: A decade of progress. Ann. Rev. Psych. (2001) 52:471–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santhanam R., Sein M. K. Improving end-user proficiency: Effects of conceptual training and nature of interaction. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5:378–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sein M. K., Santhanam R. Research report: Learning from goal-directed error recovery strategy. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10:276–285LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon S., Werner J. Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches: A field experiment. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81:648–659CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon S., Grover V., Teng J., Whitcomb K. The relationship of information system training methods and cognitive ability to end-user satisfaction, comprehension, and skill transfer: A longitudinal field study. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7:466–490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Snow R. E. Toward the assessment of cognitive and conative structures in learning. Educational Res. (1989) 18(9):8–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stajkovic A. D., Luthans F. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. (1998) 124:240–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevens C. K., Gist M. E. Effects of self-efficacy and goal-orientation training on negotiation skill maintenance: What are the mechanisms? Personnel Psych. (1997) 50:955–978CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D. W. Validating Instruments in MIS Research. MIS Quart (1989) 13:147–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tannenbaum S. I., Mathieu J. E., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. Meeting trainees' expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. J. Appl. Psych (1991) 76:759–769CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Todd P., Benbasat I. Process tracing methods in decision support systems research: Exploring the black box. MIS Quart. (1987) 11:493–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vancouver J. B., Thompson C. M., Williams A. A. The changing signs of relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86:605–620CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V. Creating favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quart (1999) 23:239–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart. (2000) 24:115–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Speier C. Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2000) 52:991–1005CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster J., Martocchio J. J. Turning work into play: Implications for microcomputer software training. J. Management (1993) 19:127–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willingham D. B. A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psych. Bull. (1998) 105:558–584Google Scholar
  • Wold H., Fornell C. Systems under indirect observation using PLS. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, Volume I: Methods (1982) (Praeger, New York) 325–347Google Scholar
  • Yi M. Y., Davis F. D. Improving computer training effectiveness for decision technologies: Behavior modeling and retention enhancement. Decision Sci. (2001) 32:521–544CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.