A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study

References

  • Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ang S., Cummings L. L., Straub D. W., Christopher E. P. The effects of information technology and the perceived mood of the feedback giver on feedback seeking. Inform. Systems Res. (1993) 4(3):240–261LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anson R., Bostrom R., Bayard W. An experiment assessing group support system and facilitator effects on meeting outcomes. Management Sci. (1995) 41(2):189–208LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Aubert B. A., Rivard S., Patry M., DeGross J. I., Huff S. L., Munro M. C. Development of measures to assess dimensions of IS operation transactions. Proc. 15th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1994) (Vancouver, British Columbia) 13–26Google Scholar
  • Bell J. The effect of presentation form on the use of information in annual reports. Management Sci. (1984) 30(2):169–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler P. M., Chou C. P., Long J. S. Practical issues in structural modeling. Common Problems/Proper Solutions, Avoiding Error in Quantitative Research (1988) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 161–192Google Scholar
  • Bergeron F., Raymond L., Rivard S. Fit in strategic information technology management research: An empirical comparison of perspectives. OMEGA (2001) 29:125–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K. A.Structural Equation Models with Latent Variables (1989) (Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K. A., Paxton P. Interaction of latent variables in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling (1998) 5(3):267–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bostrom R. P., Olfman L., Sein M. K. The importance of learning style in end-user training. MIS Quart. (1990) 101–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C. V., Bostrom R. P. Organization designs for the management of end-user computing: Reexamining the contingencies. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994) 20(4):183–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busemeyer J. R., Jones L. E. Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psych. Bull. (1983) 93:549–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmines E. G., Zeller R. A.Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) . Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Science, Series no. 07-017CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cavaye A. L. M. User participation in system development revisited. Inform. Management (1995) 29:311–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan H. C., Tan B. C. Y., Wei K. W. The query cube: A framework for assessing user productivity with database information retrieval. Proc. 15th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1994) (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) Google Scholar
  • Chan Y. E., Huff S. L., Barclay D.W., Copeland D. G. Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(2):125–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chidambaram L., Jones B. Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(4):465–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. Y. W. PLS is to LISREL as principal components analysis is to common factor analysis. Tech. Stud. (1995) 2:315–319Google Scholar
  • Chin W. Y. W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. (1998a) 22(1):vii–xviGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. Y. W., George A. Marcoulides. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998b) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
  • Chin W. Y. W. PLS-Graph Manual, Version 3.0. (2001) . UnpublishedGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. Y. W., Gopal A. Adoption intention in GSS: Importance of beliefs. Data Base Adv. (1995) 26:42–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. Y. W., Marcolin B. L. The holistic approach to construct validation in IS research: Examples of the interplay between theory and measurement. Admin. Sci. Assoc. Canada—23rd Conf., IS Proc. (1995) 16(Windsor, Ontario, Canada) Google Scholar
  • Chin W. Y. W., Newsted P. R., Rick Hoyle. Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 307–341Google Scholar
  • Chou C., Bentler P. M., Satorra A. Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo study. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. (1991) 44:347–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung W. Y., Iacono S. Use of advanced features and perceptions of software quality: An experimental study. Twenty-Seventh Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1994) . HawaiiCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6:118–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook G. J. An empirical investigation of information search strategies with implications for decision support system design. Decision Sci. (1993) 24(3):683–697CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cronbach L. J. Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psych. Bull. (1987) 102:414–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crossland M. D., Wynne B. E. Measuring and testing the effectiveness of a spatial decision support system. Twenty-Seventh Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1994) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Aamitos, CA) . HawaiiCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crossland M. D., Scudder J. N., Herschel R. T., Wynne B. E. Measuring the relationships of task and cognitive style factors and their effects on individual decision-making effectiveness using a geographic information system. Twenty-Sixth Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1993) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. J. Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980–1985: A co-citation analysis. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(3):340–353CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1992) 22:1111–1132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis S. A., Bostrom R. P. Training end users: An experimental investigation of the roles of the computer interface and training methods. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(1):61–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., D'Onofrio M., Sambamurthy V., Poole M. S. Comprehensiveness and restrictiveness in group decision heuristics: Effects of computer support on consensus decision making. The Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. System (1989) (Boston, MA)131–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickson G. W., DeSanctis G., McBride D. J. Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: A cumulative experimental report. Comm. ACM (1986) 29(1):40–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickson G. W., Partridge J.-E. L., Robinson L. H. Exploring modes of facilitative support for GDSS technology. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(2):173–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement. Management Sci. (1989) 35(10):1151–1171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: Theoretical and methodological issues. MIS Quart. (1991) March):5–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duxbury L. E., Higgins C. A., Mills S. After-hours telecommuting and work-family conflict: A comparative analysis. Inform. Sys. Res. (1992) 3(2):173–191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eckel N. The interaction between the relative accuracy of probabilistic vs. deterministic predictions and the level of prediction-task difficulty. Decision Sci. (1987) 18(2):206–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Efron B., Tibshirani R. J.An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993) (Chapman & Hall, New York) . (Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, #57)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fedorowicz J., Oz E., Berger P. D. A learning curve analysis of expert system use. Decision Sci. (1992) 23(4):797–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Bookstein F. L. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19:440–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Yi Y. Assumption of the two-step approach to latent variable modeling. Sociological Methods Res. (1992) 20:291–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Lorange P., Roos J. The cooperative venture formation process: A latent variable structural modeling approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36:1246–1255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Franz C. R. Contingency factors affecting the user involvement role in the design of successful information systems. (1979) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  • Gelderman M. The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance. Inform. Management (1998) 34:11–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J. F., Eason G. K., Nunamaker J. F., Northcraft G. B. A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(4):394–415LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ginzberg M. J. A study of the implementation process. TIMS Stud. Management Sci. (1979) 13:85–102Google Scholar
  • Goodhue D. IS attitudes: Toward theoretical and definition clarity. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1986) December 15–17(San Diego, CA)181–194Google Scholar
  • Goodhue D., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19:213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goslar M. D., Green G. I., Hughes T. H. Decision support systems: An empirical assessment for decision making. Decision Sci. (1986) 17:79–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwald A. G., Pratkanis A. R., Leippe M. R., Baumgardner M. H. Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress. Psych. Rev. (1986) 93(2):216–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hale D. P., Kasper G. M. The effect of human-computer interchange protocol on decision performance. J. Management Inform. Systems (1989) 6(1):5–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartwick J., Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information systems use. Management Sci. (1994) 40:440–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hiltz S. R., Johnson K., Turoff M. Group decision support: The effects of designated human leaders and statistical feedback in computerized conferences. J. Management Inform. Systems (1991) 8(2):81–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes C. T., Gibson M. L. Students as surrogates for managers in a decision-making environment: An experimental study. J. Management Inform. Systems (1991) 8(2):153–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Igbaria M., Baroudi J. J. A short-form measure of career orientations: A psychometric evaluation. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(2):131–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Igbaria M., Baroudi J. J. The impact of job performance evaluations on career advancement prospects: An examination of gender differences in the IS workplace. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(1):107–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ives B., Olson M. H. User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Management Sci. (1984) 30(5):589–603LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C. K.Interaction Effects In Multiple Regression (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) . Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series #07-072Google Scholar
  • Jacobs S. M., Keim R. T. An experimental study in overcoming hypothesis-confirming search strategies in computerized information retrieval systems. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1988) 81–89Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Machesky J. J. End user learning behavior in data analysis and data modeling tools. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1986) . San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Rao V. S., Huber G. P. Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment. MIS Quart. (1988) 12:645–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones W. J., McLeod R. J. The structure of executive information systems: An exploratory analysis. Decision Sci. (1986) 17:220–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jöreskog K. G., Sorbom D.PRELIS 2 User's Reference Guide (1993) (Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Jöreskog K. G., Wold H.Systems Under Indirect Observation—Causality Structure Prediction (1982) (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Jöreskog K. G., Yang F., Marcoulides G. A., Schumacker R. E. Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effect. Advanced Structural Equation Modeling, Issues and Techniques (1996) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway, NJ) 57–88Google Scholar
  • Kasper G. M., Cerveny R. P. A laboratory study of user characteristics and decision-making performance in end-user computing. Inform. Management (1985) 9:87–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keil M., Mixon R., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V. Understanding runaway information technology projects: Results from an international research program based on escalation theory. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994–95) 11(3):65–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenny D. A., Judd C. M. Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psych. Bull. (1984) 96:201–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim K. K., Umanath N. S. Structure and perceived effectiveness of software development subunits: A task contingency analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems (1992–1993) 9(3):157–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kwon T. H. A diffusion of innovation approach to MIS infusion: Conceptualization, methodology, and management strategies. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1990) (Copenhagen, Denmark) 139–147Google Scholar
  • Li F., Harmer P., Duncan T. E., Duncan S. C., Acock A., Boles S. Approaches to testing interaction effects using structural equation modeling methodology. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (1998) 33(1):1–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lohmöller J.-B.LVPLS Program Manual: Latent Variables Path Analysis with Partial Least-Squares Estimation (1984) (Zentralarchiv für empirische Sozialforschung, Köln, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Lohmöller J.-B.Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares (1989) (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lohse G. L., Johnson E. J. A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Twenty-Ninth Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1996) (IEEE, Hawaii) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackay J. M., Barr S. H., Kletke M. G. An empirical investigation of the effects of decision aids on problem-solving processes. Decision Sci. (1992) 23(1):648–672CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClelland G. H., Judd C. M. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psych. Bull114:376–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKeen J. D., Guimaraes T., Wetherbe J. C. The relationship between user participation and user satisfaction: An investigation of four contingency factors. MIS Quart. (1994) 18:427–451CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mookerjee V. S., Dos Santos B. L. Inductive expert system design: Maximizing system value. Inform. Systems Res. (1993) 4(2):111–140LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mookerjee V. S., Mannino M. V., Gilson R. Improving the performance stability of inductive expert systems under input noise. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(4):329–356LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Motiwall J., Pheng F. Y. K. Decision effectiveness and information use: Effects of cognitive style, complexity, and stress. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1982) December 13–15(Ann Arbor, MI)137–151Google Scholar
  • Noreen E. W.Computer Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses, An Introduction (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nunamaker J. F., Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S., Vogel D. R. Information technology for negotiation groups: Generating options for mutual gain. Management Sci. (1991) 37(10):1325–1347LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nutt P. C. Evaluating MIS design principles. MIS Quart. (1986) 139–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olfman L., Sein M. K., Bostrom R. P. EUC training: Comparison of methods and the role of individual differences. Proc. 22nd Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1989) (IEEE, Hawaii) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ping J. R. A. A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32:336–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ping J. R. A. Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psych. Bull. (1996) 119:166–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powers R. F., Dickson G. W. MIS project management: Myths, opinions, and reality. California Management Rev. (1973) 15:147–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Premkumar G., King W. R. The evaluation of strategic information system planning. Inform. Management (1994) 26:327–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reinartz W. J., Echambadi R., Chin W. W. Generating non-normal data for simulation of structural equation models using Mattson's method. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (2002) 37(2):227–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., DeSanctis G. An experimental evaluation of GDSS effects on group performance during stakeholder analysis. Proc. 23rd Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1990) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Hawaii) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):261–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santhanam R., Sein M. K. Improving end-user proficiency: Effects of conceptual training and nature of interaction. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(4):378–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schonberger R. J. MIS design: A contingency approach. MIS Quart. (1980) 4:13–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sengupta K., Te'eni D. Cognitive feedback in GDSS: Improving control and convergence. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(1):87–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma S., Durvasula S., Dillon W. R. Some results on the behavior of alternate covariance structure estimation procedures in the presence of non-normal data. J. Marketing Res. (1989) XXVI:214–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith K. W., Sasaki M. S. Decreasing multicollinearity: A method for models with multiplicative functions. Sociological Methods Res. (1979) 8:35–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone E. F. Moderator variables in research: A review and analysis of conceptual and methodological issues. Res. Personal and Human Resources Management (1988) 6:191–229Google Scholar
  • Suh K. S., Jenkins A. M. A comparison of linear keyword and restricted natural language data base interfaces for novice users. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(3):252–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S.Using Multivariate Statistics (1989) 2nd ed.(Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tait P., Vessey I. The effect of user involvement on system success: A continency approach. MIS Quart. (1988) March):90–107Google Scholar
  • Tan B. C. Y., Wei K. K., Watson R. T. Dampening status influence using a group support system: An empirical study. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1993) (Orlando, FL)77–89Google Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):144–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Todd P., Benbasat I. An experimental investigation of the impact of computer based decision aids on decision making strategies. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(2):87–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Todd P., Benbasat I. The use of information in decision making: An experimental investigation of the impact of computer-based decision aids. MIS Quart. (1992) 16:373–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trice A. W., Treacy M. E. Utilization as a dependent variable in MIS research. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1986) December 15–17(San Diego, CA)227–239Google Scholar
  • Umanath N. S., Scamell R. W., Sidhartha R. D. An examination of two screen/report design variables in an information recall context. J. Management Inform. Systems (1990) 21(1):216–241Google Scholar
  • Vogel D., Lehman J., Dickson G. The impact of graphical displays on persuasion: An empirical study. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1986) (San Diego, CA)Google Scholar
  • Watson R. T., Ho T. H., Raman K. S. A fourth dimension of group support systems. Comm. ACM (1994) 37(10):45–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P., Olson M. H. An assessment of the contingency theory of management information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems (1989) 6:59–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Werts C. E., Linn R. L., Jöreskog K. G. Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational Psych. Measurement (1974) 34:25–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson E. V., Addo T. B. A. The joint effects of interactions between data display and task variables on task performance. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1994) . CIS, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Wold H., Jöreskog K., Wold H. Soft modeling—The basic design and some extensions. Systems Under Indirect Observation II (1982) (North-Holland Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 1–53Google Scholar
  • Wold H., Kotz S., Johnson N. L. Partial least squares. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences (1985) 6(Wiley, New York) 581–591Google Scholar
  • Wold H., Wold H. Introduction to the second generation of multivariate analysis. Theoretical Empiricism (1989) (Paragon House, New York) vii–xiGoogle Scholar
  • Wood J. G., Nosek J. T. Discrimination of structure and technology in a group support system: The role of process complexity. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1994) . Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.