The Influence of Business Managers' IT Competence on Championing IT

References

  • Applegate L. M., McFarlan W. F., McKinney J.Corporate Information Systems Management: Text and Cases (1999) (McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Armstrong C. P., Sambamurthy V. Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructure. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):304–342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Fornell C., Fornell C. Theoretical concepts, measurement, and meaning. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis (1982) 2(Praeger, New York) 5–23Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y., Phillips L. W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:421–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(2):191–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bashein B. J., Markus M. L. A credibility equation for IT specialists. Sloan Management Rev (1997) 38(4):35–44Google Scholar
  • Bassellier G., Reich B. H., Benbasat I. Information technology competence of business managers: A definition and research model. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 17(4):159–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K. A.Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989) (Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyatzis R. E.The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance (1982) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Boynton A. C., Zmud R. W., Jacobs G. C. The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations. MIS Quart (1994) 18(3):299–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown B., Kaplan J. M., Weber T. Recentralizing IT. McKinsey Quart (2003) 2):19–22Google Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizing knowledge. California Management Rev (1998) 40(3):90–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan Y. E., Reich B. H. Information technology competence summary report. (1998) . Unpublished research paper, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W. Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart (1998) 21(1):vii–xviGoogle Scholar
  • Churchman C. W.The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization (1971) (Basic Books, Inc.,, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(March):128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook S. D. N., Brown J. S. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):381–400LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feeny D. F., Willcocks L. P. Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Rev (1998) 39(3):9–21Google Scholar
  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gefen D., Straub D. W., Boudreau M.-C. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2000) 4(7Google Scholar
  • Grant R. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Henderson J. C. Plugging into strategic partnerships: The critical IS connection. Sloan Management Rev (1990) 31(3):7–18Google Scholar
  • Howell J. M., Higgins C. A. Champions of change: Identifying, understanding, and supporting champions of technological innovations. Organ. Dynam. (1990) 19(1):40–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Ives B. Executive involvement and participation in the management of information technology. MIS Quart (1991) 15(2):205–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jasperson J. L., Zmud R. W., Sambamurthy V. The role of individuals' knowledge in explanations about the postadoptive use of enterprise IT applications. (2003) (University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK) . Working paper, Michael Price College of BusinessGoogle Scholar
  • Jö reskog K. G., Bollen K. A., Long J. S. Testing structural equation models. Testing Structural Equations Models (1993) (Sage, Newbury, Park, CA) 294–316Google Scholar
  • Jö reskog K. G., Sörbom D.LISREL VIII User's Guide (1996) (Scientific Software Inc., Mooresville, IN) Google Scholar
  • Karnøe P. Competence as process and the social embeddeness of competence building. Proc. Acad. Management 1995 Annual Meeting (1995) 427–431Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar
  • Keen P. G. W.Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA) Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maidique M. A. Entrepreneurs, champions, and technological innovation. Sloan Management Rev (1980) 21(2):59–76Google Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perception of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson K. M., Cooprider J. G. The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quart (1996) 20(4):409–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):249–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M.Tacit Dimension (1967) (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London U.K) Google Scholar
  • Preiser-Houy L. Building high-quality working relationships between information systems specialists and business clients: The impacts of is role tactics and institutional context. (1999) . Ph.D. dissertation, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Reich B. H., Benbasat I. Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quart (2000) 24(1):81–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockart J. F. The line takes the leadership—IS management in a wired society. Sloan Management Rev (1988) 29(4):57–64Google Scholar
  • Rockart J. F., Earl M. J., Ross J. W. Eight imperatives for the new IT organization. Sloan Management Rev (1996) 38(1):43–55Google Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) 4th ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ross J. W., Beath C. M., Goodhue D. L. Developing longterm competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Rev (1996) 38(1):31–42Google Scholar
  • Ryle G.The Concept of Mind (1949) (Hutchinson & Co, London U.K) Google Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W.IT Management Competency Assessment: A Tool for Creating Business Value Through IT (1994) (Financial Executives Research Foundation, Morristown, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sethi V., King W. R. Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Sci (1994) 40(12):1601–1627LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Silver M. S., Markus M. L., Beath C. M. The information technology interaction model: A foundation for the MBA core course. MIS Quart (1995) 19(3):361–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith J. B. Becoming the new technology executive. CIO Canada (1996) 41(6):39–46Google Scholar
  • Sveiby K. E. The new organizational wealth managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. (1997) (Berret-Koehler Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Venkatraman N. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Sci (1989) 35(8):942–962LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vitale M. R., Ives B., Beath C. M. Linking information technology and corporate strategy: An organizational view. Proc. Seventh Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1986) 265–276San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Zmud R. W., Elam J. J., Ginzberg M. J., Keen P. G. W., Zmud R. W. Building relationships throughout the corporate entity. Transforming The IS Organization: The Mission, The Framework, The Transition (1988) (ICIT Press, Washington, D.C) 55–82Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.