Synthesis and Decomposition of Processes in Organizations

References

  • Aalst W. M. P.van der. The application of Petri nets to workflow management. J. Circuits Systems, Comput. (1998) 8(1):21–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A., Blanning R. W. Metagraphs and Petri nets in model management. Proc. Workshop Inform. Tech. Systems (1992) 64–73Google Scholar
  • Basu A., Blanning R. W. Model integration using metagraphs. Inform. Systems Res. (1994a) 5(3):195–218LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A., Blanning R. W. Metagraphs: A tool for modeling decision support systems. Management Sci. (1994b) 40(12):1579–1600LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A., Blanning R. W. Analysis of assumptions in model bases using metagraphs. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):982–995LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A., Blanning R. W. A formal approach to workflow analysis. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):17–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Curtis B., Kellner M. I., Over J. Process modeling. Comm. ACM (1992) 35(9):75–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidow W. H., Malone M. S.The Virtual Corporation (1992) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Fleisch E., Osterle H. A process-oriented approach to business networking. Electronic J. Organ. Virtualness (2000) 2(2):1–21Google Scholar
  • Fowler M., Scott K.UML Distilled: Applying the Standard Object Modeling Language (1998) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Harel D. On visual formalisms. Comm. ACM (1988) 31(5):514–530CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herring C., Milosevic Z. Implementing B2B contracts using BizTalk. Proc. 34th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2001) Maui, HICrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar A., Zhao J. L. Dynamic routing and operational controls in workflow management systems. Management Sci. (1999) 45(2):253–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kwan M. M., Balasubramanian P. R. Dynamic workflow management: A framework for modeling workflows. Proc. 30th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1997) IV:367–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenz K., Oberweis A. Modeling interorganizational workflows with XML nets. Proc. 34th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2001) Maui, HICrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leymann F., Roller D. Workflow-based applications. IBM Systems J (1997) 36(1):102–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackenzie K. D. Processes and their frameworks. Management Sci. (2000) 46(1):110–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Crowston K., Lee J., Pentland B., Dellarocas C., Wyner G., Quimby J., Osborn C. S., Bernstein A., Herman G., Klein M., O'Donnell E. Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Sci (1999) 45(3):425–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Murata T. Petri nets: Properties analysis, and applications. Proc. IEEE (1989) 77(4):541–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson J. L.Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems (1981) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ) Google Scholar
  • Tan J. C., Harker P. T. Designing workflow coordination: Centralized versus market-based mechanisms. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):328–342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • WFMCWorkflow Standard-Interoperability Wf-XML Binding (1999) . Workflow Management Coalition, Document WFMC-TC-1023Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.