Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework

References

• Agarwal R, Prasad J (1997) The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sci. 28(3):557–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Animesh A, Prasad K (2009) Social interactions and the “Digital Divide”: Explaining variations in Internet use. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):277–294.Link, Google Scholar
• BBC (2010) Finland makes broadband a “legal right”. BBC News (January 2010) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10461048.Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Goldstein D, Mead M (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quart. 11(3):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergek A (2002) Shaping and Exploiting Technological Opportunities: The Case of Renewable Energy Technology in Sweden (Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden).Google Scholar
• Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, Lindmark S, Rickne A (2008) Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Res. Policy 37(3):407–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. 25(3):351–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bornstein MH, Bradley RH (2003) Socioeconomic Status, Parenting, and Child Development (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bostrom R, Heinen S (1977) MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. MIS Quart. 1(3):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brietbart J, Lakshmipathy N, Meinrath S (2008) The Philadelphia story: Learing from a municipal wireless pioneer. New America Foundation (December 11), http://www.newamerica.net/files/nafmigration/NAF_PhilWireless_report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Gallivan M (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(4):657–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Straub DW (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):228–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlsson B, Stankiewicz R (1991) On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. J. Evolutionary Econom. 1(2):93–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll JM, Swatman P (2000) Structured-case: A methodological framework for building theory in information systems research. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 9(4):235–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catinat M, Vedel T (2000) Public policies for digital democracy. Jacker K, Van Dijk J, eds. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice (Sage, London), 184–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaminade C, Edquist C (2006) From theory to practice: The use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. Hage J, Meeus M, eds. Innovation, Science and Institutional Change (Oxford University Press, New York), 141–160.Google Scholar
• Coleman J (1986) Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(6):1309–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper RB, Zmud RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Sci. 36(2):123–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Cox J (2005) Philadelphia Wireless win launches Earthlink's new strategy. Network World (October 6), http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/100605-earthlink-wireless.html?page=1.Google Scholar
• Crandall R, Waverman L (2000) Who Pays for Universal Service?: When Telephone Subsidies Become Transparent (Brookings Institute Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Cronin B, Davenport E (1993) Social intelligence. Annual Rev. Inform. Sci. Tech. 28(3):44–56.Google Scholar
• Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(4):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Riggins JF (2005) The digital divide: Current and future research directions. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 6(12):298–336.Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Garip F (2011) How network externalities can exacerbate intergroup inequality. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(6):1887–1933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Celeste C, Shafer S (2004) From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Neckerman K, ed. Social Inequality, (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 355–400.Google Scholar
• Edquist C (2005) Systems of innovation. Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Cambridge University Press, MA), 181–208.Google Scholar
• Fleishman G (2005) Philly CIO grilled on plan by Council. Wi-Fi Net News (September 15), http://wifinetnews.com/archives/005831.html.Google Scholar
• Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31(8–9):1257–1274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geels FW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res. Policy 33(6–7):897–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy 36(3):399–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldspink C, Kay R (2004) Bridging the micro–macro divide: A new basis for social science. Human Relations 57(5):597–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A, Klenow PJ (2002) Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers. J. Law Econom. 45(2):317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross G (2007) Lawmakers aim to protect public broadband. PC World (June 27), http://www.pcworld.com/article/121597/article.html.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Bra K (2000) Globalization and risk society. Ciborra C, ed. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 41–55.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2004) Theorizing about the design of information infrastructures: Design kernel theories and principles. Sprouts: Working Papers on Inform. Environments, Systems Organ. 4(4):207–241.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. 25(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits R (2007) Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 74(4):413–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hesseldahl A (2009) As broadband expands rapidly, America's poor lag. Businessweek (June 17), http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2009-08-17/broadband-stimulus-and-the-underservedbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice.Google Scholar
• Hu J, Reardon M (2005) Philadelphia to offer cheap broadband for whole city. Silicon.com, http://networks.silicon.com/broadband/0,39024661,39129376,00.htm.Google Scholar
• Hughes TP (1987) The evolution of large technological systems. Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ, eds. The Social Construction of Technological Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 51–82.Google Scholar
• Intel (2005) Intel® digital communities initiative will help maximize wireless capabilities worldwide. Technology@Intel Magazine 1–7.Google Scholar
• Jackson S, Edwards P, Bowker G, Knobel C (2007) Understanding infrastructure: History, heuristics, and cyberinfrastructure policy. First Monday 12(6), http://www.firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1904/1786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain A, Mandviwalla M, Banker R (2007) Government as catalyst: Can it work again with wireless Internet access? Public Administration Rev. 67(6):993–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasperson J, Carter PE, Zmud RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. 29(3):529–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J (2004) Deconstructing information packages: Organizational and behavioural implications of ERP systems. Inform. Tech. People 17(1):8–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein H, Myers M (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. 23(1):67–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kling R (2007) What is social informatics and why does it matter? Inform. Soc. 23(4):205–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut RE, Rice RE, Cool C, Fish RS (1998) Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organ. Sci. 9(4):437–453.Link, Google Scholar
• Kretzmann JP, McKnight JL (1993) Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets (Centre for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
• Kvasny L (2002) Problematizing the digital divide: Cultural and social reproduction in a community technology initiative. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Georgia State University.Google Scholar
• Lamb R, Sawyer S, Kling R (2000) Social informatics perspective on socio-technical networks. Paper Presented at the Americas Conf. Inform. Systems.Google Scholar
• Lenhart A, Horrigan J, Rainie L, Allen K, Boyce A, Madden Met al. (2003) The Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A New Look at Internet Access and the Digital Divide (Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Malerba F (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res. Policy 31(2):247–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandviwalla M, Jain A, Fesenmaier J, Smith J, Weinberg P, Meyers G (2008) Municipal broadband wireless networks: Realizing the vision of anytime, anywhere connectivity. Comm. ACM 51(2):72–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markard J, Truffer B (2008) Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Res. Policy 37(4):596–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason S, Hacker K (2003) Applying communication theory to digital divide research. IT Soc. 1(5):40–55.Google Scholar
• Mayor's Office of Communications (2004), http://www.phila.gov/pdfs/Wireless_Philadelphia_Committee_Press_Release.pdf.Google Scholar
• McCullagh D, Broache A (2005) Should cities be ISPs? CNET News (June 23), http://www.news.cnet.com/Should-cities-be-ISPs/2100-1034_3-5758262.html.Google Scholar
• Meader G, Keil M, McFarlan F (2002) The Free Internet Initiative in Lagrange (Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage Publications, Newbury, Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Mohammed A (2005) Philadelphia to be city of wireless web. Washington Post (October 5), http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/04/AR2005100401738.html.Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (1999) The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):249–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moulaert F, Sekia F (2003) Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Stud. 37(3):289–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nan N (2011) Capturing bottom-up information technology use processes: A complex adaptive systems model. MIS Quart. 35(2):505–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M, Sabherwal R (1996) Determinants of commitment to information systems development: A longitudinal investigation. MIS Quart. 20(1):23–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NTIA (2011) Exploring the Digital Nation—Computer and Internet Use at Home (National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W, Gash D (1994) Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (TOIS) 12(2):174–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3):398–427.Link, Google Scholar
• Papert S (1980) Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Pew (2012) Digital Differences (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Philadelphia Inquirer (2007) Wireless Philadelphia. Philadelphia Inquirer, http://www.wirelessphiladelphia.org/pdfs/Editorial%20%20%20Wireless%20Philadelphia%20%20%20Inquirer%20%20%2005%2031%202007.pdf.Google Scholar
• Pollock N, Williams R (2009) The sociology of a market analysis tool: How industry analysts sort vendors and organize markets. Inform. Organ. 19(2):129–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ribes D, Finholt TA (2009) The long now of technology infrastructure: Articulating tensions in development. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(5):375–398.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Selwyn N (2004) Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media Soc. 6(3):341–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Singer M (2004) “Wireless Philadelphia” sparks concern. InternetNews.com (December 2), http://www.internetnews.com/wireless/article.php/3442851.Google Scholar
• Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res. policy 34(10):1491–1510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star S, Bowker G (2006) How to infrastructure. Lievrouw LA, Livingstone SM, eds. Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs, Vol. 230 (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA), 151–161.Google Scholar
• Star SL, Ruhleder K (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):111–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Strassman M (2005) Dianah Neff, the City of Philadelphia's Chief Technology Officer, talks about Wireless Philadelphia, http://www.etopiamedia.net/emtnn/pages/bwaw/bwaw48-5551212.html.Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Valente TW (1995) Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations, Quantitative Methods in Communication Series (Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ).Google Scholar
• Van Dijk J (1999) The Network Society. Social Aspects of New Media. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Van Dijk J (2006) Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics 34(4–5):221–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dijk J, Hacker K (2003) The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Inform. Soc. 19(4):315–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh T (2005) Philadelphia free-for-all. GCN.com (March 21), http://gcn.com/articles/2005/03/21/philadelphia-freeforall.aspx.Google Scholar
• Warschauer M (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Weiss M (2005) Cities, partners press for municipal wireless networks: Large phone companies oppose efforts, push Federal & State Wi-Fi bans, Cable Digital News (July 1), http://www1.prontonetworks.com/Cable_Digital_News.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wirelessphiladelphia.org (2005) Introducing Wireless Philadelphia. http://www.wirelessphiladelphia.org/newsletter_november.htm.Google Scholar
• Yin R (1989) Case Study Research, Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar