From Knowing It to “Getting It”: Envisioning Practices in Computer Games Development

References

• Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4):665–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allhutter D, Hofmann R (2010) Deconstructive design as an approach for opening trading zones. Vallverdú J, ed. Thinking Machines and the Philosophy of Computer Science: Concepts and Principles (Idea Group Inc., Calgary, Canada), 175–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoyama Y, Izushi H (2003) Hardware gimmick or cultural innovation? Technological, cultural, and social foundations of the Japanese video game industry. Res. Policy 32(3):423–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Baxterand R, Lyytinen K (2010) Dynamics of inter-organizational knowledge creation and information technology use across object worlds: The case of an innovative construction project. Construction Management Econom. 28(6):569–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergman M, Lyytinen K, Mark G (2007) Boundary objects in design: An ecological view of design artifacts. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(11):546–568.Google Scholar
• Boland R, Lyytinenand K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau MC, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16(1):3–8.Link, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1990) The Logic of Practice (Polity, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P, Johnson R (1993) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Braudy L, Cohen M (2004) Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Brown AD, Stacey P, Nandhakumar J (2008) Making sense of sensemaking narratives. Human Relations 61(8):1035–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrd TA, Cossick KL, Zmud RW (1992) A synthesis of research on requirements analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques. MIS Quart. 16(1):117–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carroll JM (1995) Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 408.Google Scholar
• Chiasson MW, Davidson E (2005) Taking industry seriously in information systems research. MIS Quart. 29(4):591–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohendet P, Simon LT (2007) Playing across the playground: Paradoxes of knowledge creation in the videogame firm. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M (1991) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience: Steps Toward Enhancing the Quality of Life (Harper Collins Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Davidson E, Pai D (2004) Making sense of technological frames: Promise, progress, and potential. Kaplan B, Truex D, Wastell D, Wood-Harpe T, DeGross J, eds., Relevant Theory and Informed Practice: Looking Forward from a 20 Year Perspective on IS Research (Kluwer, Boston), 473–491.Google Scholar
• Davidson EJ (2002) Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quart. 26(4):329–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic Motivation (Plenum Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deterding S, Sicart M, Nacke L, O'Hara K, Dixon D (2011) Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. Proc. Annual Conf. Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Comput. Systems (ACM, New York). 2011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engels F, McLellan D (2009) The Condition of the Working Class in England (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ewenstein B, Whyte J (2007) Beyond words: Aesthetic knowledge and knowing in organizations. Organ. Stud. 28(5):689–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewenstein B, Whyte J (2009) Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as “epistemic objects.” Organ. Stud. 30(1):7–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Green L, Miles I, Rutter J (2007) Hidden innovation in the creative sectors. Report, the National Endowment for Science, Technology, and the Arts, London.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl M, Tractinsky N (2006) User experience–a research agenda. Behav. Inform. Tech. 25(2):91–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson K (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscriptive devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci., Tech., Human Values 16(4):448–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh D (2006) Bourdieu, the media and cultural production. Media, Culture Soc. 28(2):211–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu CL, Lu HP (2004) Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inform. Management 41(7):853–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iivari J, Isomaki H, Pekkola S (2010) The user—The great unknown of systems development: Reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement. Inform. Systems J. 20(2):109–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarke M, Pohl K (1993) Vision driven system engineering. Prakash N, Rolland C, Pernici B, eds. Proc. IFIP WG8.1 Working Conf. Inform. System Development Process. (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson D, Wiles J (2003) Effective affective user interface design in games. Ergonomics 46(13–14):1332–1345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates JA (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Kerr A (2002) Representing users in the design of digital games. Proc. Comput. Games and Digital Cultures Conf., Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
• Lamb R, Kling R (2003) Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quart. 27(2):197–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2010) What's under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N (2005) Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):109–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quart. 29(2):335–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin C-P, Bhattacherjee A (2010) Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: A theoretical model and empirical test. Inform. Systems J. 20(2):163–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, More PHB, Faraj S (2012) Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 23(4):951–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Jarulaitisand G, Hepsø V (2012) The family resemblance of technologically mediated work practices. Inform. Organ. 22(3):169–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D (2009) Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching lenses and trailing connections. Organ. Stud. 30:1391–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3:463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2010) Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective, and philosophy. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 22–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Baroudi JJ (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Inform. Systems Res. 2(1):1–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC (1994) Technological frames—Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 12(2):174–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3):267–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Potts J, Cunningham S, Hartley J, Ormerod P (2008) Social network markets: A new definition of the creative industries. J. Cultural Econom. 32(3):167–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (2008) Global entertainment and media outlook: 2008–2012. (PricewaterhouseCoopers, New York).Google Scholar
• Rafaeli A, Vilnai-Yavetz I (2004) Emotion as a connection of physical artifacts and organizations. Organ. Sci. 15(6):671–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Rip A, Misa TJ, Schot J (1995) Managing Technology in Society (Pinter Publishers, London).Google Scholar
• Roberto MA, Carioggia GM (2003) Electronic Arts: The Blockbuster Strategy Harvard Business School Case 304-013, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Schatzki TR, Knorr-Cetina K, von Savigny E (2001) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Schultze U (2010) Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: A review. J. Inf. Technol. 25(4):434–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultze U (2011) The avatar as sociomaterial entanglement: A performative perspective on identity, agency and world-making in virtual worlds. Proc. Internet. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association of Information Systems, Shanghai), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceeding/hci/11.Google Scholar
• Schultze U, Leahy MM (2009) The avatar-self relationship: Enacting presence in second life. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems ( Association of Information Systems, Phoenix), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/12.Google Scholar
• Schultze U, Orlikowski WJ (2010) Research commentary—Virtual worlds: A performative perspective on globally distributed, immersive work. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):810–821.Link, Google Scholar
• Stacey P, Nandhakumar J (2009) A temporal perspective of the computer game development process. Inform. Systems J. 19(5):479–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL (2010) This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci., Tech. Human Values 35(5):601–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SLh, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3):387–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson EB, Ramiller NC (1997) The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organ. Sci. 8(5):458–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Thom J, Millen D, DiMicco J (2012) Removing gamification from an enterprise SNS. Proc. Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tschang FT (2007) Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ. Sci. 18(6):989–1005.Link, Google Scholar
• Tschang TF, Szczypula J (2006) Idea creation, constructivism and evolution as key characteristics in the videogame artifact design process. Eur. Management J. 24(4):270–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quart. 28(4):695–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 74(4):74–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko M, Teigl R, Leidner D, Jarvenpaa S (2011) Stepping into the Internet: New ventures in virtual worlds. MIS Quart. 35(3):645–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whyte JK, Cardellino P (2010) Learning by design: Visual practices and organizational transformation in schools. Design Issues 26(2):59–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SJ, Butler BS (2011) Creating bigger problems: Grand challenges as boundary objects and the legitimacy of the information systems field. J. Inf. Technol. 26(2):99–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolgar S (1991) Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. Law J, ed. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (Routledge, London), 58–95.Google Scholar
• Zackariasson P, Styhre A, Wilson TL (2006a) Phronesis and creativity: Knowledge work in video game development. Creativity and Innovation Management 15(4):419–429.Google Scholar
• Zackariasson P, Walfisz M, Wilson TL (2006b) Management of creativity in video game development. Services Marketing Quart. 27(4):73–97.Crossref, Google Scholar