Licensing and Competition for Services in Open Source Software

References

• Adamson C (2005) Welcome to a new world: JBoss world. O'Reilly ONJava.com (March 9), http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/03/09/jbossworld2k5.html.Google Scholar
• August T, Tunca TI (2006) Network software security and user incentives. Management Sci. 52(11):1703–1720.Link, Google Scholar
• August T, Tunca TI (2008) Let the pirates patch? An economic analysis of software security patch restrictions. Inform. Systems Res. 19(1):48–70.Link, Google Scholar
• August T, Tunca TI (2011) Who should be responsible for software security? A comparative analysis of liability policies in network environments. Management Sci. 57(5):934–959.Link, Google Scholar
• Bessen J (2006) Open source software: Free provision of complex public goods. Bitzer J, Shroder PJ, eds. The Economics of Open Source Software Development (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 57–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broersma M (2005) Open-source databases find their place in the enterprise. Techworld (June 8), http://www.features.techworld.com/applications/1506/open-source-databases-find-their-place-in-the-enterprise/.Google Scholar
• Brunelli M (2005) Open source gaining traction in ERP market. SearchSAP.com (June 29), http://www.searchsap.techtarget.com/news/1102271/Open-source-gaining-traction-in-ERP-Market.Google Scholar
• Capek P, Frank S, Gerdt S, Shields D (2005) A history of IBM's open-source involvement and strategy. IBM Systems J. 44(2):249–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Ghemawat P (2006) Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Sci. 52(7):1072–1084.Link, Google Scholar
• Coar K (2006) The open source definition (annotated). http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php.Google Scholar
• Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C (2009) Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd ed. (The MIT Press).Google Scholar
• Farber D (2004) Six barriers to open source adoption. ZDNet.com (March 29), http://zdnet.com/six-barriers-to-open-source-adoption-2039173298/.Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse J-F (1979) Price competition, quality and income disparities. J. Econom. Theory 20(3):340–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaudeul A (2004a) Competition between open-source and proprietary software: The LaTeX case study. (September). Working paper, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK,Google Scholar
• Gaudeul A (2004b) Open source software development patterns and license terms. (September). Working paper, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
• Hars A, Ou S (2002) Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 6(3):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E, Sethi SP, Zhou J (2008) Open source development with a commercial complementary product or service. Production Oper. Management 17(1):29–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herz J, Lucas M, Scott J (2006) Open technology development: Roadmap plan (June). U.S. Department of Defense http://www.dtic.mil/tr/fulltext/u2/a450769.pdf.Google Scholar
• Hewlett-Packard (2007) Open source and Linux from HP. http://opensource.hp.com/.Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Richards GL (2006) The business of free software: Enterprise, incentives, investment, and motivation in the open source community. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston,Google Scholar
• IBM (2007) IBM 2007 annual report http://www.ibm.com/annualreport/2007/.Google Scholar
• Johnson JP (2002) Open source software: Private provision of a public good. J. Econom. Management Strategy 11(4):637–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerstetter J (2004) Redemption for JBoss's boss. BusinessWeek (October 18), http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2004-10-18/redemption-for-jbosss-boss.Google Scholar
• Koch S, Schneider G (2002) Effort, co-operation and co-ordination in an open source software project: Gnome. Inform. Systems J. 12(1): 27–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Metiu A (2001) Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 17(2): 248–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kontzer T (2005) Open-source SugarCRM takes on Siebel, Salesforce.com. Inform. Week (April 11), http://www.informationweek.com/open-source-sugarcrm-takes-on-siebel-sal/160700756.Google Scholar
• Kuk G (2006) Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Management Sci. 52(7):1031–1042.Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1988) The dynamics of incentive contracts. Econometrica 56(5):1153–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaMonica M (2005) Site offers open-source clearinghouse. CNET News (July).Google Scholar
• Lee D, Mendelson H (2008) Divide and conquer: Competing with free technology under network effects. Production Oper. Management 17(1):12–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2005a) The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(2):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2005b) The scope of open source licensing. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 21(1):20–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li L, McKelvey RD, Page T (1987) Optimal research for Cournot oligopolists. J. Econom. Theory 42(1):140–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacLeod WB, Malcomson JM (1993) Investments, holdup, and the form of market contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(4):811–837.Google Scholar
• Miller PD (2006) Applied Asymptotic Analysis. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 75 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mockus A, Fielding R, Herbsleb J (2000) A case study of open source software development: The Apache server. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. Software Engrg., ICSE 2000, Limerick Ireland, (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 263–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller HM (2000) Asymptotic efficiency in dynamic principal-agent problems. J. Econom. Theory 91:292–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oi WY (1983) Heterogeneous firms and the organization of production. Econom. Inquiry 21(2):147–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pei PP-E, Simchi-Levi D, Tunca TI (2011) Sourcing flexibility, spot trading, and procurement contract structure. Oper. Res. 59(3):578–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer W, Swinkels JM (2000) Efficiency and information aggregation in auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(3):499–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond ES (1999) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, 1st ed. (O'Reilly and Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, Hann I-H, Slaughter SA (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. 52(7):984–999.Link, Google Scholar
• Sager I (2005) The myth of open-source. BusinessWeek (July 7).Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ, Ammeter AP, Maruping LM (2006) Impacts of license choice and organizational sponsorship on user interest and development activity in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 17(2):126–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Cusumano MA, Kahl SJ (2013) Services and the business models of product firms: An empirical analysis of the software industry. Management Sci. 59(2):420–435.Link, Google Scholar
• Tunca TI, Zenios SA (2006) Supply auctions and relational contracts for procurement. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(1):43–67.Link, Google Scholar
• Vance A (2009) A software populist who doesn't do Windows. New York Times (January 11).Google Scholar
• Virijevich P (2005) LAMP made easy with XAMPP. Linux.com (June 23).Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, von Hippel E (2006) The promise of research on open source software. Management Sci. 52(7):975–983.Link, Google Scholar
• Watson RT, Boudreau M-C, York PT, Greiner ME, Donald Wynn J (2008) The business of open source. Comm. ACM 51(4):41–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Zhou Z (2012) Lock-in strategy in software competition: Open-source software vs. proprietary software. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):536–545.Link, Google Scholar