Do Recommender Systems Manipulate Consumer Preferences? A Study of Anchoring Effects

References

• Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommendation system: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engrg. 17(6):734–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Lewenstein G, Prelec D (2003) “Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 118:73–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell RM, Koren Y (2007) Improved Neighborhood-based Collaborative Filtering. Berkhin P, Caruana R, Wu X, eds. KDD Cup and Workshop (ACM, New York), 7–14.Google Scholar
• Bennet J, Lanning S (2007) The Netflix Prize. Berkhin P, Caruana R, Wu X, eds. KDD Cup and Workshop (ACM, New York), 3–6.Google Scholar
• Breese JS, Heckerman D, Kadie C (1998) Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. Cooper G, Moral S, eds. Fourteenth Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco), 43–52.Google Scholar
• Chapman G, Bornstein B (1996) The more you ask for, the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 10:519–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman G, Johnson E (2002) Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 120–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ),273–288.Google Scholar
• Cosley D, Lam S, Albert I, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2003) Is seeing believing? How recommender interfaces affect users' opinions. Cockton G, Korhonen P, eds., CHI 2003 Conference, Fort Lauderdale FL (ACM, New York), 585–592.Google Scholar
• Deshpande M, Karypis G (2004) Item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 22(1):143–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Gilovich T (2010) Anchoring unbound. J. Consumer Psych. 20:20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn LJ (2006) Like this? You'll hate that. (Not all Web recommendations are welcome.) New York Times, (January 23) http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/23/technology/23recommend.html.Google Scholar
• Funk S (2006) Netflix Update: Try This at Home, (December 11, 2006). Retrieved January, 2010), http://sifter.org/∼simon/journal/20061211.html.Google Scholar
• Goldberg K, Roeder T, Gupta D, Perkins C (2001) Eigentaste: A constant time collaborative filtering algorithm. Inform. Retrieval 4(July):133–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacowitz KE, Kahneman D (1995) Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21:1161–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson JEV, Schnytzer A, Liu S (2009) To what extent do investors in a financial market anchor their judgments excessively? Evidence from the Hong Kong horserace betting market. J. Behav. Decision Making 22:410–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komiak S, Benbasat I (2006) The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quart. 30(4):941–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koren Y (2009) The BellKor solution to the Netflix grand prize. NetflixPrize.com. http://www.netflixprize.com/assets/GrandPrize2009_BPC_BellKor.pdf.Google Scholar
• Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C (2009) Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Comput. Soc. 42:30–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ku G, Galinsky AD, Murnighan JK (2006) Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90:975–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lam S, Riedl J (2004) Shilling recommender systems for fun and profit. Feldman S, Uretsky M, eds. 13th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, New York City, NY (ACM, New York), 353–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, eds. (2006) The Construction of Preference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNee SM, Lam SK, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2003) Interfaces for eliciting new user preferences in recommender systems. User Modeling 2003, Proc., (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 178–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobasher B, Burke R, Bhaumik R, Williams C (2007) Toward trustworthy recommender systems: An analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. ACM Trans. Internet Tech. 7(4):Article 23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Strack F (2000) Numeric judgments under uncertainty: The role of knowledge in anchoring. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 36:495–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Northcraft G, Neale M (1987) Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39:84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piotte M, Chabbert M (2009) The pragmatic theory solution to the Netflix grand prize, (August, 2009), http://www.netflixprize.com/assets/GrandPrize2009_BPC_PragmaticTheory.pdf.Google Scholar
• Pu P, Chen L (2007) Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 20(August 6): 542–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo JE (2010) Understanding the effect of a numerical anchor. J. Consumer Psych. 20:25–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2001) Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. Shen V, Saito N, Lyu M, Zurko M, eds., 10th Intl. WWW Conf., Hong Kong (ACM, New York), 285–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schkade DA, Johnson EJ (1989) Cognitive processes in preference reversals. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 44:203–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schonfeld E (2007) Click here for the upsell. CNNMoney.com (July). http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2007/07/01/100117056/index.htm.Google Scholar
• Shih W, Kaufman S, Spinola D (2007) Netflix. Harvard Bus. School, Case 9-607-138, May 31.Google Scholar
• Strack F, Mussweiler T (1997) Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73:437–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swearingen K, Sinha R (2001) Beyond algorithms: An HCI perspective on recommender systems. Herlocker J, ed., ACM SIGIR 2001 Workshop on Recommender Systems, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
• Thorsteinson T, Breier J, Atwell A, Hamilton C, Privette M (2008) Anchoring effects on performance judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107:29–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tintarev N, Masthoff J (2011) Designing and evaluating explanations for recommender systems. Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor P, eds. Recommender Systems Handbook (Springer, New York), 479–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Töscher A, Jahrer M, Bell R (2009) The bigchaos solution to the Netflix grand prize, (September 5, 2009), http://www.netflixprize.com/assets/GrandPrize2009_BPC_BigChaos.pdf.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Benbasat I (2007) Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: Effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(4):217–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson R, Pettijohn J (2010) Tracking online ad campaigns: A primer. J. Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 12:69–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo K, Gretzel U (2011) Creating more credible and persuasive recommender systems: The influence of source characteristics on recommender system evaluations. Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor P, eds. Recommender Systems Handbook (Springer, New York), 455–477.Crossref, Google Scholar