Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles

References

• Achrol RS, Stern LW (1988) Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. J. Marketing Res. 25(1):36–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Gort M (2002) Firm and product life cycles and firm survival. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(2):184–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albrecht CC, Dean DL, Hansen JV (2005) Marketplace and technology standards for B2B e-commerce: Progress, challenges, and the state of the art. Inform. Management 42(6):865–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. 103(3):411–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews RL, Currim IS (2003) Retention of latent segments in regression-based marketing models. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 20(4):315–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 16(Spring):74–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Bardhan IR, Chang H, Lin S (2006) Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities and plant performance. MIS Quart. 30(2):315–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Barua A, Mani D, Mehra A (2010) Coordination and cooperation, coordination, and governance in multisourcing: An agenda for analytical and empirical research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(December):785–795.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrett H, Weinstein A (1998) The effect of market orientation and organizational flexibility on corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 23(1):57–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett MS (1937) The statistical conception of mental factors. British J. Psych. 28:97–104.Google Scholar
• Barua A, Mukhopadhyay T (2000) Information technology and business performance. Zmud RW, ed. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past. (Pinnaflex Press, Cincinnati).Google Scholar
• Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 6(1):3–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynki BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Sci. 45(7):1008–1024.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolffson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Business Wire News Release (2013) Press release (April 10, 2013), http://finance.yahoo.com/news/patti-scipione-m-lady-nissan-123000031.html.Google Scholar
• Celeux G, Soromenho G (1996) An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. J. Classification 13(2):195–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (2000) The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. J. Marketing 64(3):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi L, Ravichandran T, Andrevski G (2010) Digital platforms, network structure and competitive actions. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):543–570.Link, Google Scholar
• Chiasson MW, Davidson E (2005) Taking industry seriously in information systems research. MIS Quart. 29(4):591–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Aveni RA, Battista D, Smith KG (2010) The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1371–1385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dayton MC, MacReady GB (1988) Concomitant variables latent class models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83(401):173–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird MN (1977) Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the E-M algorithm. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Series B (39):1–38.Google Scholar
• Deshpandé R, Farley JU (1998) Measuring market orientation: Generalization and synthesis. J. Market-Focused Management 2(3):213–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dias JG, Vermunt JK (2007) Latent class modeling of website users' search patterns: Implications for online market segmentation. J. Retailing and Consumer Services 14(6):359–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):382–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garen J (1984) The returns to schooling: A selectivity bias approach with a continuous choice variable. Econometrica 52(5):1199–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg VK, Walters BA, Priem RL (2003) Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance. Strategic Management J. 24(8):725–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L, Kaplan SN (2001) The effects of business-to-business e-commerce on transaction costs. J. Indust. Econom. 49(December):463–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Mukhopadhyay T, Rajan U (2007) The impact of Internet referral services on a supply chain.. Inform. Sys. Res. 18(3):300–319.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldman SL, Nagel RN, Preiss K (1995) Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York).Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Tansuhaj P (2001) Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crises: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. J. Marketing 65(April):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Lilien G, Mallapragada G (2006) Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Sci. 52(7):1043–1056.Link, Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Chakravarty A, Ding M, Liechty J (2008) Counting chickens before the eggs hatch: Associating new product development portfolios with shareholder expectations in the pharmaceutical sector. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 25(4):261–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Chandrashekaran M, Johnson JL, Mallapragada G (2013) Moderating role of the environment for the effect of market orientation on firm outcomes: Accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 41(2):206–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimm CM, Lee H, Smith KG (2006) Strategy as Action: Competitive Dynamics and Competitive Advantage (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Keats BW, DeMarie SM (1998) Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Acad. Management Executive 12(4):22–42.Google Scholar
• Hough JR, White MA (2003) Environmental dynamism and strategic decision-making rationality: An examination at the decision level. Strategic Management J. 24(5):481–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurley RF, Hult TM (1998) Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. J. Marketing 62(3):42–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski BJ, Kohli AK (1993) Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing 57(3):53–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi K (1991) A model of users' perspective on change: The case of information systems technology implementation. MIS Quart. 15(2):229–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kambil A, van Heck E (2002) Making Markets: How Firms Can Design and Profit from Online Auctions and Exchanges (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Sawhney M (2000) E-hubs: The new B2B marketplace. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(May/June):97–103.Google Scholar
• Kirca AH, Jayachandran S, Bearden WO (2005) Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. J. Marketing 69(2):24–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koch H (2010) Developing dynamic capabilities in electronic marketplaces: A cross-case study. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 19(1):28–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Grover V (2008) Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(1):23–39.Google Scholar
• Lastovicka JL, Thamodaran K (1991) Common factor score estimates in multiple regression problems. J. Marketing Res. 28(1):105–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Sambamurthy V, Lim K, Wei KK (2003) The moderating effects of environmental dynamism on the links between IT management and agility: A moderated mediation analysis, Working paper, University of Massachusetts, Boston.Google Scholar
• Leisch F (2004) FlexMix: A general framework for finite mixture models and latent class regression in R. J. Statist. Software 11(8):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Ramamurthy K (2011) Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quart. 35(4):931–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra Y (2003) Why knowledge management systems fail? Enablers and constraints of knowledge management in human enterprises. Koenig MED, Srikantaiah TK, eds. Knowledge Management Lessons Learned: What Works and What Doesn't (Medford, New Jersey).Google Scholar
• Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin RI (1989) The logic of electronic markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 67(3):166–172.Google Scholar
• Mata F, Fuerst WL, Barney JB (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. 19(4):487–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Choudhury V, Kacmar C (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. 13(3):334–359.Link, Google Scholar
• Meredith W (1993) Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58(4):525–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishina Y, Pollock TG, Porac JF (2004) Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management J. 25(12):1179–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthén B (1989) Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika 54(4):557–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthén B (2001) Latent Variable Mixture Modeling (Mahaw, NJ).Google Scholar
• Muthén B, Shedden K (1999) Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics 55(2):463–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthén L, Muthén B (2007) Mplus User's Guide (Muthé and Muthé, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Overby E, Bharadwaj A, Sambamurthy V (2006) Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15:120–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2010) The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):443–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Gefen D (2004) Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):37–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piccoli G, Ives B (2005) IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of literature. MIS Quart. 29(4):747–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management 12(4):531–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N (2006) Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. 30(2):225–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Kotha S (2001) Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1263–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross JW, Beath CM, Goodhue DL (1996) Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Rev. 38(1):31–42.Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Zmud RW (1999) Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. 23(2):261–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj AS, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2):237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney JT (2003) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product organization design. Raghu GAK, Kumaraswamy A, Langlois RN, eds. Managing the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organization Design (Basil Blackwell Publishers, New York), 362–380.Google Scholar
• Sarkar MB, Echambadi R, Harrison JS (2001) Alliance entrepreneurship and firm market performance. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):701–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethi R, Pant S, Sethi A (2003) Web-based product development systems integration and new product outcomes: A conceptual framework. J. Product Innovation Management 20(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheffi Y, Rice JBJ (2005) Building the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(1):41–48.Google Scholar
• Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland DR (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Acad. Management J. 32(1):273–292.Google Scholar
• Skrondal A, Laake P (2001) Regression among factor scores. Psychometrika 66(4):563–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Bailey J, Brynjolfsson E (2000) Understanding digital markets: Review and assessment. Brynjolfsson E, Kahin B, eds. Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools and Research (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 276–288.Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R (2006) Dual distribution and intangible firm value: Franchising in restaurant chains. J. Marketing 70(3):120–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Pinsonneault A (2011) Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quart. 35(2):463–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher JB, Perrewe PL (2002) An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quart. 26(4):381–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson GH (1934) The meaning of i in the estimate of g. British J. Psych. 25:92–99.Google Scholar
• Titterington D, Smith A, Makov U (1985) Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England).Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau (2010) E-Stats (May 10, 2010), http://www.census.gov//econ/estats/2010/2010reportfinal.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wedel M, DeSarbo WS (1998) Mixtures of (constrained) ultrametric trees. Marketing Lett. 63(4):17–25.Google Scholar
• Wheeler B (2002) NeBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Inform. Systems Res. 13(2):125–146.Link, Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):991–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wixom BH, Watson HJ (2001) An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quart. 25(1):17–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Worren N, Moore K, Cardona P (2002) Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1123–1140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yung YF (1997) Finite mixtures in confirmatory factor-analysis models. Psychometrika 62(3):297–330.Crossref, Google Scholar