Research Commentary—The Disciplines of Information: Lessons from the History of the Discipline of Medicine

References

• ABMS (2011) Medical specialties and subspecialties. Retrieved August 3, 2011, http://www.abms.org/who_we_help/physicians/specialties.aspx.Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Lucas HC (2005) The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quart. 29(3):381–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• AIS (2012) AIS specialization. Association for Information Systems website. Retrieved January 16, 2012, http://home.aisnet.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=49.Google Scholar
• Alter S (2008) Defining information systems as work systems: Implications for the IS field. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(5):448–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman DG (2002) Poor-quality medical research. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 287(21):2765–2767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• AMA (2011) AMA Physician Specialty Groups and Codes. Retrieved August 20, 2011, from www.mmslists.com/definitionspdf/AMASpecialtyCodes.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ariens M (1993) Know the law: A history of legal specialization. South Carolina Law Rev. 45:1003–1061.Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges (2008) Industry Funding of Medical Education: Report of an AAMC Task Force. Retrieved from https://www.aamc.org/download/157370/data/industry_funding_report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Avgerou C (2001) The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Inform. Systems J. 11(1):43–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avison D, Ein-Dor P (2007) The status of the discipline of information systems. ICIS Proc. (AIS, Montreal).Google Scholar
• Avison D, Elliot S (2006) Scoping the discipline of information systems. King JL, Lyytinen K, eds. Information Systems: The State of the Field (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 3–18.Google Scholar
• Baird P (2003) Getting it right: Industry sponsorship and medical research. Canadian Medical Assoc. J. 168(10):1267–1269.Google Scholar
• Baskerville RL, Myers MD (2002) Information systems as a reference discipline. MIS Quart. 26(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baskerville RL, Myers MD (2004) Special issue on action research in information systems: Making IS research relevant to practice. MIS Quart. 28(3):329–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauman Z, May T (2001) Thinking Sociologically (Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Beck AH (2004) The Flexner report and the standardization of American medical education. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 291(17):2139–2140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Zmud RW (2003) The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quart. 27(2):183–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benhamou E, Eisenberg J, Katz RH (2010) Assessing the changing U.S. IT R&D ecosystem. Comm. ACM 53(2):76–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennis WG, O'Toole J (2005) How business schools lost their way. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96–104.Google Scholar
• Brunton D (2004) The emergence of a modern profession? Brunton D, ed. Medicine Transformed, Health, Disease and Society in Europe 1800–1930 (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK),119–150.Google Scholar
• Bryant A (2008) The future of information systems—Thinking informatically. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(6):695–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryant A, Black A, Land F, Porra J (2013) Information systems history: What is history? What is IS history? What IS history?…and why even bother with history? J. Inform. Tech. 28(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucher R, Strauss A (1961) Professions in process. Amer. J. Sociol. 66(4):325–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellani B, Hafferty FW (2006) The complexities of medical professionalism. Professionalism in Medicine (Springer, New York), 3–23. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/0-387-32727-4_1.pdf.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran B (1981) Natural and social system metaphors for distributed problem solving: Introduction to the issue. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Trans. 11(1):1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiasson MW, Davidson E (2005) Taking industry seriously in information systems research. MIS Quart. 29(4):591–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn AL (1966) Medical malpractice litigation: A plague on both houses. ABAJ 52:32.Google Scholar
• Comer DE, Gries D, Mulder MC, Tucker A, Turner AJ, Young PR (1989) Computing as a discipline. Comm. ACM 32(1):9–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM (2006) American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. New England J. Medicine 355(13):1339–1344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cumming A, Ross M (2008) The Tuning Project (Medicine)—Learning Outcomes/Competencies for Undergraduate Medical Education in Europe (University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK).Google Scholar
• D'Aunno T, Sutton RI, Price RH (1991) Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Acad. Management J. 34(3):636–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GB (2000) Information systems conceptual foundations: Looking backward and forward. Organ. Soc. Perspect. Inform. Tech.: IFIP TC8 WG8.2 Internat. Working Conf. Soc. Organ. Perspect. Res. Practice Inform. Tech., June 9–11, 2000, Aalborg, Denmark (Springer, Amsterdam), 61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dearden J (1972) MIS is a mirage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 50(1):90–99.Google Scholar
• Denning PJ (2005) Is computer science science? Comm. ACM 48(4):27–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G (2003) The social life of information systems research: A response to Benbasat and Zmud's call for returning to the IT artifact. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 4(1):360–376.Google Scholar
• Dogan M (2001) Specialization and recombination of specialties in the social sciences. Smelser NJ, Baltes PB, eds. International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Pergamon-Elsevier Science, London), 14851–14855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dooley K (2002) Organizational complexity. International Encyclopedia of Business and Management (Thompson Learning, London), 5013–5022.Google Scholar
• Dunn MB, Jones C (2010) Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):114–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernández-Cruz L (2004) General surgery as education, not specialization. Ann. Surgery 240(6):932–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flexner A (1910) Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (Carnegie Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Frank U (1998) Reflections on the Core of the Information Systems Discipline, Research Report 14. University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.Google Scholar
• Frank U (2006) Towards a pluralistic conception of research methods in information systems research. Institut für Informatik und Wirtschaftsinformatik (ICB), Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.Google Scholar
• Freidson E (1988) Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. Retrieved from http://www.citeulike.org/group/3317/article/262887.Google Scholar
• Froehlich TJ (1989) The foundations of information science in social epistemology. Proc. Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci., Vol. 4 (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 306–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galliers RD (2003) Change as crisis or growth? Toward a transdisciplinary view of information systems as a field of study: A response to Benbasat and Zmud's call for returning to the IT artifact. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 4(1):337–351.Google Scholar
• Gärtner C, Dietze F (1989) Trends in the specialty of internal medicine: Specialization and/or integration. Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Innere Medizin Und Ihre Grenzgebiete 44(23):698–701.Google Scholar
• Gelfand T (1976) The origins of a modern concept of medical specialization: John Morgan's Discourse of 1765. Bull. Hist. Medicine 50(4):511–535.Google Scholar
• Gelfand T (1980) Professionalizing Modern Medicine: Paris Surgeons and Medical Science and Institutions in the 18th Century (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Gibson G (1932) The edinburgh letter. Canadian Medical Assoc. J. 26(6):738–739.Google Scholar
• GMC (2011) The State of Medical Education and Practice in the UK (UK General Medical Council, London).Google Scholar
• Goffman W (1970) Information science: Discipline or disappearance? Aslib Proc. 22(12):589–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray P (2012) The other? SIGMIS Database 43(2):26–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood G, Frederickson RF (1964) Specialization in the Medical and Legal Professions (Callaghan & Co., Mundelein, IL).Google Scholar
• Griffiths JM (2000) Back to the future: Information science for the new millennium. Bull. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 26(4):24–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V (2012) The information systems field: Making a case for maturity and contribution. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(4).Google Scholar
• Halperin EC, Perman JA, Wilson EA (2010) Abraham Flexner of Kentucky, his report, medical education in the United States and Canada, and the historical questions raised by the report. Acad. Medicine 85(2):203–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halpern S, Anspach RR (1993) The study of medical institutions Eliot Freidson's legacy. Work Occupations 20(3):279–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hashem A, Chi MT, Friedman CP (2003) Medical errors as a result of specialization. J. Biomedical Informatics 36(1):61–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill KR (1962) Some reflections on medical education and teaching in the developing countries. British Medical J. 2(5304):585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn G, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Hoffmann-Riem H, Joye D, Pohl C, Zemp E (2008) The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. Hirsch Hadorn G, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Hoffmann-Riem H, Joye D, Pohl C, Zemp E, eds. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 19–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschheim R, Klein HK (2003) Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 4(5):237–293.Google Scholar
• Hirschheim R, Klein HK (2011) Setting the scene: Tracing the history of the information systems field. Galliers RD, Currie W, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems, Critical Perspectives and New Directions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 16–61.Google Scholar
• Hirschheim R, Klein HK (2012) A glorious and not so-short history of the information systems field. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(4):188–235.Google Scholar
• Holloway SWF (1964) Medical education in England, 1830–1858: A sociological analysis. History 49(167):299–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes C (2007) IFIP Professional Practice Task Force. Retrieved September 12, 2011, http://www.ifip.or.at/projects/ITProf_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• IFIP (2012a) IFIP technical committees. Retrieved January 21, 2012, http://www.ifip.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=185&Itemid=439.Google Scholar
• IFIP (2012b) TC and WG—Membership, Aims and Scopes. Retrieved January 21, 2012, http://www.ifip.org/bulletin/bulltcs/tc_aim.php.Google Scholar
• Iivari J, Hirschheim R, Klein H (2008) Challenges of professionalization: Bridging research and practice through a body of knowledge for IT specialists. Avison D, Kasper GM, Pernici B, Ramos I, Roode D, eds. Advances in Information Systems Research, Education and Practice, Vol. 274 (Springer, Boston), 15–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iivari J, Hirschheim R, Klein HK (2004) Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for information systems experts: Coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals. Inform. Systems J. 14(4):313–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irby DM, Cooke M, O'Brien BC (2010) Calls for reform of medical education by the teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad. Medicine 85(2):220–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• iSchools (2011) Retrieved September 18, 2011, http://www.ischools.org/.Google Scholar
• James B, Hammond M (2000) The challenge of variation in medical practice. Archives Pathology Laboratory Medicine 24(7):1001–1003.Google Scholar
• Johnson C, Green B (2010) 100 years after the Flexner report: Reflections on its influence on chiropractic education. J. Chiropractic Ed. 24(2):145–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnston C (1957) Of one medicine, nine surgeries. Archives Surgery 74:661–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joiner C (1953) Specialization in the law? The medical profession shows the way. Amer. Bar Assoc. J. 39:539–543.Google Scholar
• Jones C (2001) Co-evolution of entrepreneurial careers, institutional rules and competitive dynamics in American film, 1895–1920. Organ. Stud. 22(5):911–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juch A (1996) The position of medical specialists in the Netherlands (1890–1920). Gewina 19(4):231–245.Google Scholar
• Juch A (1997) De Medisch Specialisten in De Nederlandse Gezondheidszorg (Erasmus, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), 1890–1941.Google Scholar
• Khazanchi D, Munkvold BE (2000) Is information systems a science? An inquiry into the nature of the information systems discipline. DATA BASE Adv. Inform. Systems 31(3):24–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick J (1996) Specialist certification for lawyers: What is going on? Univ. Miami Law Rev. 51:273–387.Google Scholar
• King JL, Lyytinen K, eds. (2006) Information Systems: The State of the Field (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Kock N, Lau F (2001) Information systems action research: Serving two demanding masters. Inform. Tech. People 14(1):6–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Land F (2010) The use of history in IS research: An opportunity missed? J. Inform. Tech. 25(4):385–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Land F, Loebbecke C, Angehrn A, Clemons E, Hevner A, Muelle G (2009) ICIS 2008 panel report: Design science in information systems: Hegemony, bandwagon, or new wave? Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(1):501–508.Google Scholar
• Lee YS (1996) “Technology transfer” and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Res. Policy 25(6):843–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leeming W (2001) Professionalization theory, medical specialists and the concept of “national patterns of specialization”. Soc. Sci. Inform. 40(3):455–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindgren S (2012) Basic Medical Education WFME Global Standards for the 2012 Revision (University of Copenhagen, Denmark).Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas HC (1999) The State of the information systems field. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 1(1).Google Scholar
• Lukaitis A, Lukaitis S, Davey B (2010) The birth of information systems. History of Computing. Learning from the Past (Springer, Boston), 206–215. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-15199-6_21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lunt B, Ekstrom J, Reichgelt H, Bailey M, Leblanc R (2010) IT 2008: The history of a new computing discipline. Comm. ACM 53(12):133–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynch GR (1946) The organization of other professions: The medical profession. J. Proc. Roy. Inst. Chemistry Great Britain Ireland 70:209–252.Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, King JL (2004) Nothing at the center?: Academic legitimacy in the information systems field. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 5(6):220–246.Google Scholar
• Markus ML (2011) Historical reflections on the practice of information management and implications for the field of MIS. Galliers RD, Currie W, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems, Critical Perspectives and New Directions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 3–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullough RCI (1970) Specialization and the law school. Amer. Bar Assoc. J. 56:647–649.Google Scholar
• McGarity TO (2008) Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA). Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Ah6-__otORAC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&ots=TnfrcATcpx&sig=RWmqFKSZGKdGIJZiN_6t9Cy5b4w.Google Scholar
• McGrath K (2005) Doing critical research in information systems: A case of theory and practice not informing each other. Inform. Systems J. 15(2):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mechanic R, Coleman K, Dobson A (1998) Teaching hospital costs. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 280(11):1015–1019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles SH (2002) On a new charter to defend medical professionalism: Whose profession is it anyway? Hastings Center Rep. 32(3):46–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller P, Hopper T, Laughlin R (1991) The new accounting history: An introduction. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 16(5–6):395–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitev N, De Vaujany F-X (2012) Seizing the opportunity: Towards a historiography of information systems. J. Inform. Tech. 27(2):110–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neal L (2000) A shocking view of economic history. J. Econom. Hist. 60(2):317–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2006) The artifact redux: Further reflections on the “IT” in IT research. King JL, Lyytinen K, eds. Information Systems: The State of the Field (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 287–292.Google Scholar
• Otten K, Debons A (1970) Towards a metascience of information: Informatology. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 21(1):89–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelling M (1987) Medical practice in early modern England: Trade or profession? Prest WR, ed. The Professions in Early Modern England (Croom Helm, London), 90–128.Google Scholar
• Poyago-Theotoky J, Beath J, Siegel DS (2002) Universities and fundamental research: Reflections on the growth of university-industry partnerships. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 18(1):10–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prislin MD, Saultz JW, Geyman JP (2010) The generalist disciplines in American medicine one hundred years following the Flexner report: A case study of unintended post-Flexnerian reform. Acad. Medicine 85(2):228–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramiller N, Swanson EB, Wang P (2008) Research directions in information systems: Toward an institutional ecology. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rastegar DA (2004) Health care becomes an industry. Ann. Family Medicine 2(1):79–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D (1996) Research commentary: Diversity in information systems research: Threat, promise, and responsibility. Inform. Systems Res. 7(4):400–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosen G (1944) The Specialization of Medicine with Particular Reference to Ophthalmology (Froben Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Schepers RMJ (1994) Towards unity and autonomy: The Belgian medical profession in the nineteenth century. Medical Hist. 38(3):237–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schrewe B (2013) From history to myth: Productive engagement with the Flexnerian metanarrative in medical education. Adv. Health Sci. Ed. 18(5):1121–1138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seo M, Creed WED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):222–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shanley C (2007) Management of change for nurses: Lessons from the discipline of organizational studies. J. Nursing Management 15(5):538–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siddall RB (1956) Specialization in the law: A retort to Professor Joiner's call for control. Amer. Bar Assoc. J. 42.Google Scholar
• Sidorova A, Evangelopoulos N, Valacich JS, Ramakrishnan T (2008) Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quart. 32(3):467–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sloan FA, Chepke LM (2008) Medical Malpractice (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somers MJ (2010) Using the theory of the professions to understand the IS identity crisis. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 19:382–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stamper R (1973) Information in Business and Administrative Systems (B.T. Batsford Ltd., London).Google Scholar
• Stevens R (1966) Medical Practice in Modern England: The Impact of Specialization and State Medicine (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Stevens R (1971) American Medicine and the Public Interest (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Stevens R (2003) Medical Practice in Modern England: The Impact of Specialization and State Medicine (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Stichweh R (2001) History of scientific disciplines. Smelser NJ, Batles PB, eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK), 13727–13731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor H, Dillon S, Wingen MV (2010) Focus and diversity in information systems research: Meeting the dual demands of a healthy applied discipline. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(4):647–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tedre M (2011) Computing as a science: A survey of competing viewpoints. Minds Machines 21(3):361–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH (2004) Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA). Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=BH8dhYHM6CwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Thornton+institutional&ots=TCscgt7em-&sig=YXHYO-Akdsqtv1QauZ95VaTGj7os.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tosteson DC (1990) New pathways in general medical education. New England J. Medicine 322(4):234–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tousijn W (2006) Beyond decline: Consumerism, managerialism and the need for a new medical professionalism. Health Sociol. Rev. 15(5):469–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vessey I, Ramesh V, Glass RL (2005) A unified classification system for research in the computing disciplines. Inform. Software Tech. 47(4):245–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang WT, Pontes J (2005) Information science: A science or a metascience? 3rd Center for Humanities, Arts, and TechnoScience (CHATS) Conf.: Structure, Space and Transmigrations (Albany, NY).Google Scholar
• Warner JH (2013) The humanizing power of medical history: Responses to biomedicine in the 20th-century United States. Procedia—Soc. Behavioral Sci. 77:322–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisz G (1994a) Mapping medical specialization in Paris in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Soc. Hist. Medicine 7(2):177–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisz G (1994b) The development of medical specialization in nineteenth-century paris. French Medical Culture in the Nineteenth Century (Rodopi, Atlanta), Vol. 7, 149–188.Google Scholar
• Weisz G (1997) Medical directories and medical specialization in France, Britain, and the United States. Bull. Hist. Medicine 71(1):23–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisz G (2003) The emergence of medical specialization in the nineteenth century. Bull. Hist. Medicine 77(3):536–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisz G (2006) Divide and Conquer: A Comparative History of Medical Specialization (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Westmore A (2007) Knowing more about less. Metascience 16:571–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter R (2008) Design science research in Europe. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(5):470–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woollard RF (2006) Caring for a common future: Medical schools' social accountability. Medical Ed. 40(4):301–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y (2010) Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quart. 34(2):213–231.Crossref, Google Scholar