Online Gambling Behavior: The Impacts of Cumulative Outcomes, Recent Outcomes, and Prior Use

References

• Aarts H, Dijksterhuis A (2000) Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(1):53–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Werner S, Abbott JL, Angert C, Park JH, Kohlhausen D (2010) Customer-centric science: Reporting significant research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):515–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja MK, Thatcher JB (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quart. 29(3):427–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• American Gaming Association (2010) Government affairs, priority issues, online gaming. Accessed March 28, 2014, http://www.americangaming.org/government-affairs/key-issues/online-gambling.Google Scholar
• Ang S, Slaughter S, Ng KY (2002) Human capital and institutional determinants of information technology compensation: Modeling multilevel and cross-level interactions. Management Sci. 48(11):1427–1445.Link, Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH, Moore DA (2008) Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Beck L, Ajzen I (1991) Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. J. Res. Personality 25(3):285–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Business Insights (2010) The future of digital gambling: The impact of regulation, the rise of online services and the evolving competitive environment. MarketResearch.com (March 1), Accessed March 28, 2014, http://www.marketresearch.com/business-insights-v893/future-digital-gambling-impact-regulation-2637052.Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clotfelter CT, Cook PJ (1989) Selling Hope: State Lotteries in America (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cook PJ, Clotfelter CT (1993) The peculiar scale economies of Lotto. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(3):634–643.Google Scholar
• Cooper RB, Zmud RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: A technology diffusion approach. Management Sci. 36(2):123–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Cotte J, LaTour KA (2009) Blackjack in the kitchen: Understanding online versus casino gambling. J. Consumer Res. 35(5):742–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Sundali J (2005) The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. J. Risk Uncertainty 30(3):195–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Guinea AO, Markus ML (2009) Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quart. 33(3):433–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deadrick DL, Bennett N, Russell CJ (1997) Using hierarchical linear modeling to examine dynamic performance criteria over time. J. Management 23(6):745–757.Google Scholar
• DeHoratius N, Raman A (2008) Inventory record inaccuracy: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 54(4):627–641.Link, Google Scholar
• Division on Addiction (2009) Actual Internet sport gambling activity from February 2005 through September 2005. Division on Addiction, The Transparency Project [database distributor], Medford, MA.Google Scholar
• Eggen D (2010) Internet gambling again in play. The Washington Post (February 7), http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/06/AR2010020602190.html.Google Scholar
• Enders CK, Tofighi D (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psych. Methods 12(2):121–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredricks AJ, Dossett DL (1983) Attitude-behavior relations: A comparison of the Fishbein-Ajzen and the Bentler-Speckart models. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(3):501–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Vallone R, Tversky A (1985) The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psych. 17(3):295–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Derevensky JL (1998) Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. J. Gambling Stud. 14(4):319–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guryan J, Kearney MS (2008) Gambling at lucky stores: Empirical evidence from state lottery sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):458–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Gavin MB (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management 24(5):623–641.Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Griffin MA, Gavin MB (2000) The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 467–511.Google Scholar
• Holsapple CW, Wu J (2008) Building effective online game websites with knowledge-based trust. Inform. Systems Frontiers 10(1):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Weber EU (1999) Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(2):165–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh JJP, Wang W (2007) Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 16(3):216–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson AC, Dowling N, Thomas SA, Bond L, Patton G (2008) Adolescent gambling behaviour and attitudes: A prevalence study and correlates in an Australian population. Internat. J. Mental Health Addiction 6(3):325–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansson A, Grant JE, Kim SW, Odlaug BL, Götestam KG (2009) Risk factors for problematic gambling: A critical literature review. J. Gambling Stud. 25(1):67–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keasey K, Moon P (1996) Gambling with the house money in capital expenditure decisions: An experimental analysis. Econom. Lett. 50(1):105–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khare A, Inman JJ (2006) Habitual behavior in American eating patterns: The role of mean occasions. J. Consumer Res. 32(4):567–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SS (2009) The integrative framework of technology use: An extension and test. MIS Quart. 33(3):513–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Malhotra NK (2005) A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying post-adoption phenomena. Management Sci. 51(5):741–755.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Son JY (2009) Out of dedication or constraint? A dual model of post-adoption phenomena and its empirical test in the context of online services. MIS Quart. 33(1):49–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Malhotra NK, Narasimhan S (2005) Two competing perspectives on automatic use: A theoretical and empirical comparison. Inform. Systems Res. 16(4):418–432.Link, Google Scholar
• Koehler JJ, Conley CA (2003) The “hot hand” myth in professional basketball. J. Sport Exercise Psych. 25(2):253–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut R, Mukhopadhyay T, Szczypula J, Kiesler S, Scherlis B (1999) Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Inform. Systems Res. 10(4):287–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Kunreuther H, Ginsberg R, Miller L, Sagi P, Slovic P, Borkan B, Katz N (1978) Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Lam D (2007) An exploratory study of gambling motivations and their impact on the purchase frequencies of various gambling products. Psych. Marketing 24(9):815–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lam D, Mizerski R (2009) An investigation into gambling purchases using the NBD and NBD-Dirichlet models. Marketing Lett. 20(3):263–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Limayem M, Hirt SG, Cheung CMK (2007) How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quart. 31(4):705–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massa M, Simonov A (2005) Behavioral biases and investment. Rev. Finance 9(4):483–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (1998) At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Acad. Management J. 41(4):441–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mennecke BE, McNeill D, Roche EM, Bray DA, Townsend AM, Lester J (2008) Second life and other virtual worlds: A roadmap for research. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(1):371–388.Google Scholar
• Mizerski D, Miller R, Mizerski K, Lam D (2004) The stochastic nature of purchasing a state’s lottery products. Australasian Marketing J. 12(3):56–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Manchanda P (2012) An empirical analysis of individual level casino gambling behavior. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(1):27–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nisbet S (2009) How customers behave on the gaming floor: Revelations from employees. J. Travel Tourism 26(4):430–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T (1998) Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance 53(5):1775–1798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Hsu CHC (2001) Volitional degrees of gambling behaviors. Ann. Tourism Res. 28(3):618–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouellette JA, Wood W (1998) Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psych. Bull. 124(1):54–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rachlin H (1990) Why do people gamble and keep gambling despite heavy losses? Psych. Sci. 1(5):294–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (1986) A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology Ed. 59(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Saga VL, Zmud RW (1994) The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. Levine L, ed. Diffusion, Transfer, and Implementation of Information Technology (North Holland, Amsterdam), 67–86.Google Scholar
• Shaffer HJ, Hall MN, Vander Bilt J (1999) Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. Amer. J. Public Health 89(9):1369–1376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprott DE, Brumbaugh AM, Miyazaki AD (2001) Motivation and ability as predictors of play behavior in state-sponsored lotteries: An empirical assessment of psychological control. Psych. Marketing 18(9):973–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullum J (2008) Fantasy gambling: The truth about sports betting. New York Post (June 7), http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/fantasy_gambling_COw1ucZpvYadym8xzn3hzO.Google Scholar
• Takahasi D (2009) Betfair puts its money on online horse racing in the U.S. VentureBeat (June 26), http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/06/26/betfair-puts-its-money-on-online-horse-racing-gambling-in-the-us/.Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Toneatto T, Blitz-Miller T, Calderwood K, Dragonetti R, Tsanos A (1997) Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. J. Gambling Stud. 13(3):253–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psych. 5(2):207–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Ackerman PL (2000) A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 83(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quart. 36(1):157–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Maruping LM, Bala H (2008) Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quart. 32(3):483–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson S (2007) How a cyber world is making real money. MoneyWeek (September 17), http://www.moneyweek.com/news-and-charts/how-a-cyber-world-is-making-real-money.aspx.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wyatt E (2011) Ruling by Justice Dept. opens a door on online gambling. New York Times (December 24), http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/25/us/online-gaming-loses-obstacle-at-justice-department.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all.Google Scholar