Using Personal Communication Technologies for Commercial Communications: A Cross-Country Investigation of Email and SMS

References

• Anand R, Kumar M, Jhingran A (1999) Distributing E-coupons on the Internet. Proc. INET, http://www.isoc.org/isoc/conferences/inet/99/proceedings/1d/1d_1.htm.Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aurier P, Siadou-Martin B (2007) Perceived justice and consumption experience evaluations: A qualitative and experimental investigation. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 18(5):450–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bampo M, Ewing MT, Mather DR, Stewart D, Wallace M (2008) The effects of the social structure of digital networks on viral marketing performance. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):273–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Yancey S (2010) Enhancing mobile coupon redemption in fast food campaigns. J. Retailing 4(2):97–110.Google Scholar
• Barboza D (2010) China's Internet giants may be stuck there. New York Times (March 23), http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/business/global/24internet.html.Google Scholar
• Baroudi JT, Orlikowski WJ (1989) The problem of statistical power in MIS research. MIS Quart. 13(1):87–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bijker WE (2010) How is technology made?—That is the question! Cambridge J. Econom. 34:63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG (1992) Notions of position in social network analysis. Sociol. Methodology 22:1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Dogan K (2008) Customer-centric marketing with Internet coupons. Decision Support Systems 44:606–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiou-Wei S-Z, Inman JJ (2008) Do shoppers like electronic coupons? A panel data analysis. J. Retailing 84(September):297–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleveland M, Laroche M (2007) Acculturaton to the global consumer culture: Scale development and research paradigm. J. Bus. Res. 60(3):249–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cormode G, Krishnamurthy B (2008) Key differences between Web1.0 and Web2.0. First Monday 13(6):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutrell E, Czerwinski M, Horvitz E (2001) Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. Hirose M, ed. Interact Conf. (IOS Press, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) A proposed integration among organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Sci. 32:554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• DeVellis RF (2003) Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Ducheneaut N (2002) The social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A case study of electronic power games using communication genres. Inform. Comm. Soc. 5(2):153–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eldridge M, Grinter B (2001) Studying text messaging in teenagers. CHI 2001 Workshop: Mobile Comm.: Understanding Users, Adoption and Design, Seattle.Google Scholar
• Ferris M (2007) Insights on mobile advertising, promotion and research. J. Advertising Res. 47(1):28–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortin DR (2000) Clipping coupons in cyberspace: A proposed model of behavior for deal-prone consumers. Psych. Marketing 17(6):515–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frehner C (2008) Email—SMS—MMS: The linguistic creativity of asynchronous discourse in the new media age. Linguistic Insights, Vol. 58 (Peter Lang Pub. Inc., Bern, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Friedman TL (2005) The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology. Acad. Management J. 36(5):921–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulk J, Schmitz J, Steinfield CW (1990) A social influence model of technology use. Fulk J, Steinfield C, eds. Organizations and Communication Technology (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA), 117–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. 19(2):213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grönroos C (2004) The relationship marketing process: Communication, interaction, dialogue, value. J. Bus. Indust. Marketing 19(2):99–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Tan FB, Turner T, Xu H (2008) An exploratory investigation into instant messaging preferences in two distinct cultures. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. 51(4):396–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall ET (1976) Beyond Culture (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Heinonen K, Strandvik T (2007) Consumer responsiveness to mobile marketing. Internat. J. Mobile Comm. 5(6):603–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hian LB, Chaun SL, Trevor TMK, Detenber BH (2004) Getting to know you: Exploring the development of relational intimacy in computer-mediated communication. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 9(3).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hovick S, Meyers R, Timmerman C (2003) Email communication in workplace romantic relationships. Comm. Stud. 54(4):468–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69(1):85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz JE, Aakhus MA (2002) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil M, Tan BCY, Wei KK, Saarinen T, Tuunainen V, Wassenaar A (2000) A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quart. 24(2):299–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Siegel J, McGuire TW (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Amer. Psychologist 39(10):1123–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Pan Y, Park HS (1998) High- versus low-context culture: A comparison of Chinese, Korean, and American cultures. Psych. Marketing 15(6):507–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim H, Kim GJ, Park HW, Rice RE (2007) Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 12(1):1183–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SD (2002) Korea: Personal meanings. Katz JE, Aakhus M, eds. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 63–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein H, Kleinman D (2002) The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Sci., Tech., Human Values 27:28–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koo C, Wati Y, Jung JS (2011) Examination of how social aspects moderate the relationship between task characteristics and usage of social communication technologies (SCTs) in organizations. Internat. J. Inform. Management 31:445–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Swaminathan S (2005) The different faces of coupon elasticity. J. Retailing 81(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri N (2010) Geographic distribution of R&D activity: How does it affect innovation quality? Acad. Management J. 53(5):1194–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Längenbold R (2011) eCommerce wird zu einem festen Bestandteil des Einkaufsverhaltens. Nielsen, http://ch.de.nielsen.com/site/pr20110222.shtml.Google Scholar
• Larson PD, Kulchitsky JD (2006) The use and impact of communication media in purchasing and supply management. J. Supply Chain Management 36(3):29–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larsson L (1997) Tillämpad Kommunikationsvetenskap, 3rd ed. (Studentlitteratur AB, Lund, Sweden).Google Scholar
• Le Bodic G (2003) Mobile Messaging Technologies and Services: SMS, EMS and MMS (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Lee A (1994) Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quart. 18(2):145–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lei J (2010) Quantity versus quality: A new approach to examine the relationship between technology use and student outcomes. British J. Educational Tech. 41(3):455–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leidner DE, Kayworth TA (2006) Review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quart. 30(2):357–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leone RP, Srinivasan SS (1996) Coupon face value: Its impact on coupon redemptions, brand sales, and brand profitability. J. Retailing 72(3):273–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Chau PYK, Van Slyke C (2010) A comparative study of individual acceptance of instant messaging in the US and China: A structural equation modeling approach. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 26(5):85–106.Google Scholar
• Ling R, Yttri B (2006) Control, emancipation and status: The mobile telephone in the teen's parental and peer group control relationships. Kraut R, Brynin M, Kiesler S, eds. Computers, Phones and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology (Oxford University Press, New York), 219–234.Google Scholar
• Longmate E, Baber C (2002) A comparison of text messaging and e-mail support for digital communities. Faulkner X, Finlay J, Détienne F, eds. Proc. HCI 2002 (Springer, London), 69–87.Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D, Wajcman J (1999) The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd ed. (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK).Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Rice RE, Malhotra A, King N, Ba S (2000) Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24(4):569–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mante E (2002) The Netherlands and the U.S.A. compared. Katz JE, Aakhus M, eds. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 110–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mejias R, Shepherd MM, Vogel DR, Lazaneo L (1997) Consensus and perceived satisfaction level: A cross-cultural comparison of GSS and non-GSS outcomes within and between the United States and Mexico. J. Management Inform. Systems 13(3):137–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miranda SM, Saunders CS (2003) The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Inform. Systems Res. 14(1):87–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Miyata K (2006) Longitudinal effects of mobile Internet use on social network in Japan. Internat. Comm. Assoc. Conf., Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar
• Morgan DL (1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Nord WR (1986) Social construction of technology. Acad. Management J. 11(3):666–670.Google Scholar
• Okazaki S, Taylor CR (2008) What is SMS advertising and why do multinationals adopt it? Answers from an empirical study in European markets. J. Bus. Res. 61:4–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onkvisit S, Shaw JJ (1993) International Marketing: Analysis and Strategy, 2nd ed. (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2008) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts: Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 255–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Yates J, Okamura K, Fujimoto M (1995) Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ. Sci. 6(4):423–444.Link, Google Scholar
• Page C, Lepkowska-White E (2002) Web equity: A framework for building consumer value in online companies. J. Consumer Marketing 19(3):231–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park JH, Suh HJ, Yang HD (2007) Perceived absorptive capacity of individual users in performance of enterprise resource planning (ERP) usage: The case for Korean firms. Inform. Management 44(3):300–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps J, Lewis R, Mobilo L, Perry D, Raman N (2004) Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. J. Advertising Res. 44(4):333–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinch T, Bijker W (1987) The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Bijker W, Hughes T, Pinch T, eds. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 17–50.Google Scholar
• Richardson RM, Smith SW (2007) The influence of high/low-context culture and power distance on choice of communication media: Students' media choice to communicate with professors in Japan and America. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations 31(4):479–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sackmann SA (1992) Culture and sub-cultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1):140–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahay S, Robey D (1996) Organizational context, social interpretation, and the implementation and consequences of geographic information systems. Accounting, Management, Inform. Tech. 6(4):255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahay S, Palit M, Robey D (1994) A relativist approach to studying the social construction of information technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 4(3):248–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schutz A (1967) Phenomenology of the Social World (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
• Sia SK, Soh C (2007) An assessment of package organisation misalignment: Institutional and ontological structures. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 16(5):568–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srite M, Karahanna E (2006) The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quart. 30(3):679–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp JBEM, Geyskens I (2006) How country characteristics affect the perceived value of websites. J. Marketing 70(3):136–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D, Loch K, Evaristo JR, Karahanna E, Srite M (2002) Toward a theory-based measurement of culture. J. Global Inform. Management 10(1):13–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strong DM, Volkoff O (2010) Understanding organization-enterprise system fit: A path to theorizing the IT artifact. MIS Quart. 34(4):731–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan BCY, Wei KK, Watson RT, Clapper DL, McLean ER (1998) Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Sci. 44(9):1263–1278.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor AS, Vincent J (2005) A SMS history. Hamill L, Lasen A, eds. Mobiles: Past, Present and Future (Springer, Godalming, UK), 75–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tremblay MC, Hevner AR, Berndt DJ (2010) The use of focus groups in design science research. Design Res. Inform. Systems, Integrated Ser. Inform. Systems 22:121–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trevino LK, Lengel RH, Daft RL (1987) Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations. Comm. Res. 14: 553–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trevino LK, Webster J, Stein EW (2000) Making connections: Complementary influences on communication media choices attitudes, and use. Organ. Sci. 11(2):163–182.Link, Google Scholar
• Urbany JE, Bearden WO, Weilbaker DC (1988) The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference prices on consumer perceptions and price search. J. Consumer Res. 15:95–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner W, Kronberger N, Seifert F (2002) Collective symbolic coping with new technology: Knowledge, images and public discourse. British J. Soc. Psych. 41:323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J, Trevino LK (1995) Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies. Acad. Management J. 38(6):1544–1572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiedemann D, Haunstetter T, Pousttchi K (2008) Analyzing the basic elements of mobile viral marketing-an empirical study. Austin R, ed. IEEE 7th Internat. Conf. Mobile Bus. (ICMB'08) (IEEE Computer Society, Danvers, MA), 75–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams R, Edge D (1996) The social shaping of technology. Res. Policy 25:865–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Würtz E (2005) A cross-cultural analysis of websites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. J. Computer-Mediated Comm. 11(1):Article 13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perception of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing 52(3):2–22.Crossref, Google Scholar