Project Managers' Practical Intelligence and Project Performance in Software Offshore Outsourcing: A Field Study

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0523

References

  • Abdel-Hamid TK (1990) Investigating the cost/schedule trade-off in software development. IEEE Software 7(1):97–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken L, West S (1991) Multiple Regressions: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Aladwani AM (2002) An integrated performance model of information systems projects. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):185–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andres HP, Zmud RW (2002) A contingency approach to software project coordination. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(3):40–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ang S, Inkpen AC (2008) Cultural intelligence and offshore outsourcing success: A framework of firm level intercultural capability. Decision Sci. 39(3):337–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ang S, Straub DW (1998) Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the U.S. banking industry. MIS Quart. 22(4):535–552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aron R, Singh JV (2005) Getting offshoring right. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(12):135–143.Google Scholar
  • Baccarini D (1996) The concept of project complexity—A review. Internat. J. Project Management 14(4):201–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2000) Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: A study of the Indian software industry. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):989–1017.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barki H, Rivard S, Talbot J (1993) Toward an assessment of software development risk. J. Management Inform. Systems 10(2):203–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barki H, Rivard S, Talbot J (2001) An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(4):37–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barry EJ, Kemerer CF, Slaughter SA (2006) Environmental volatility, development decisions, and software volatility: A longitudinal analysis. Management Sci. 52(3):448–464.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Belsley D, Kuh E, Welsch R (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biørn E (2004) Regression system for unbalanced panel data: A stepwise maximum likelihood procedure. J. Econometrics 122(2):281–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloch M, Blumberg S, Laartz J (2012) Delivering large-scale IT projects on time, on budget, and on value. Accessed April 16, 2014, http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/delivering_large-scale_it_projects_on_time_on_budget_and_on_value.Google Scholar
  • Boehm BW, Abts C, Brown AW, Chulani S, Clark BK, Horowitz E, Madachy Ret al. (2000) Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Boyd BK, Dess GG, Abdul MA (1993) Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2):204–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks FP (1995) The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, Anniversary ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Buse A (1973) Goodness of fit in generalized least squares estimation. Amer. Statistician 27(3):106–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell DJ (1988) Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 13(1):40–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmel E (1999) Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Bharadwaj A (2009) An empirical analysis of contract structures in IT outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 20(4):484–506.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chua CE, Lim WK, Soh C, Sia SK (2012) Enacting clan control in complex IT projects: A social capital perspective. MIS Quart. 36(2):577–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J, Cohen P (1975) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 1st ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K, Kammerer EE (1998) Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development. IBM Systems J. 37(2):227–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse C, Mukhopadhyay T, Goldenson DR, Kellner MI (1995) Software processes and project performance. J. Management Inform. Systems 12(3):187–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deloitte Consulting (2005) Calling a Change in the Outsourcing Market. Accessed February 21, 2013, http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-Luxembourg/Local%20Assets/Documents/Global_brochures/us_outsourcing_callingachange.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Dey D, Fan M, Zhang C (2010) Design and analysis of contracts for software outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):93–114.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dibbern J, Winkler J, Heinzl A (2008) Explaining variations in client extra costs between software projects offshored to India. MIS Quart. 32(2):333–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan WR (1996) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA).Google Scholar
  • Earley PC, Ang S (2003) Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions Across Cultures (Stanford Business Books, Redwood City, CA).Google Scholar
  • El-Sabaa S (2001) The skills and career path of an effective project manager. Internat. J. Project Management 19(1):1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espinosa JA, Cummings JN, Wilson JM, Pearce BM (2003) Team boundary issues across multiple global firms. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(4):157–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut R, Herbsleb J (2007) Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ. Sci. 18(4):613–630.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psych. Bull. 5:327–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A (2011) Why your IT project may be riskier than you think. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(9):23–25.Google Scholar
  • Galbraith JR (1973) Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Goodman PS, Garber S (1988) Absenteeism and accidents in a dangerous environment: Empirical analysis of underground coal mines. J. Appl. Psych. 73(1):81–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman PS, Leyden DP (1991) Familiarity and group productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 76(4):578–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal A, Gao G (2009) Certification in the Indian offshore IT services industry. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(3):471–492.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal A, Gosain S (2010) Research note—The role of organizational controls and boundary spanning in software development outsourcing: Implications for project performance. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):960–982.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal A, Sivaramakrishnan K (2008) Research note—On vendor preferences for contract types in offshore software projects: The case of fixed price vs. time and materials contracts. Inform. Systems Res. 19(2):202–220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal A, Mukhopadhyay T, Krishnan MS (2002) The role of communication and processes in offshore software development. Comm. ACM 45(4):193–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal A, Mukhopadhyay T, Krishnan MS, Sivaramakrishnan K (2003) Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 49(12):1671–1683.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2002) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Harman HH (1967) Modern Factor Analysis, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Hart OD, Holmstrom B (1987) The theory of contracts. Bewley TF, ed. Advances in Economic Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA), 71–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harter D, Krishnan MS, Slaughter SA (2000) Effects of process maturity on quality, cost, and cycle time in software product development. Management Sci. 46(4):451–466.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hedlund J, Antonakis J, Sternberg R (2002) Tacit knowledge and practical intelligence: Understanding the lessons of experience. ARI Research Note 2003-04, United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Belvoir, VA.Google Scholar
  • Herbsleb JD, Mockus A (2003) An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 29(6):481–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hirschheim R, Heinzl A, Dibbern J, eds. (2002) Information Systems Outsourcing: Enduring Themes, Emergent Patterns and Future Directions (Springer, Berlin), 3–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsiao C (1986) Analysis of Panel Data (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69(1):85–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C (1996) Applied Software Measurement: Assuring Productivity and Quality (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Joseph D, Ang S, Chiang R, Slaughter SA (2010) Beyond technical abilities: The practical intelligence of information technology professionals. Comm. ACM 53(2):149–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kern T, Willcocks L (2000) Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships: Theory and practice. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 9(4):321–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch LJ (2000) Software project management: An integrated perspective for an emerging paradigm. Zmud RW, ed. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future…Through the Past (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati), 285–304.Google Scholar
  • Kirsch LJ, Sambamurthy V, Ko DG, Puris RL (2002) Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Sci. 48(4):484–498.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch LS (1997) Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3):215–239.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kemerer CF (1993) Reliability of function points measurement: A field experiment. Comm. ACM 36(2):85–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut RF, Streeter LA (1995) Coordination in software development. Comm. ACM 38(3):69–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan MS (1998) The role of team factors in software cost and quality: An empirical analysis. Inform. Tech. People 11(1):20–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacity MC, Willcocks LP (2001) Global Information Technology Outsourcing: In Search of Business Advantage (John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Lee DMS, Trauth EM, Farwell D (1995) Critical skills and knowledge requirements of I/S professionals: A joint academic/industry investigation. MIS Quart. 19(3):313–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N, Vaast E (2008) Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quart. 32(2):307–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCormack A, Kemerer CF, Cusumano M, Crandall B (2003) Trade-offs between productivity and quality in selecting software development practices. IEEE Software 20(5):78–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mann CC (2002) Why software is so bad…. and what is being done to fix it. MIT Tech. Rev. 105(July/August):33–38.Google Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Marquardt DW (1970) Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased, linear estimation, and non-linear estimation. Technometrics 12(3):591–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maxwell K, Van Wassenhove L, Dutta S (1999) Performance evaluation of general and company specific models in software development effort estimation. Management Sci. 45(6):787–803.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mookerjee VS, Chiang IR (2002) A dynamic coordination policy for software system construction. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 28(6):684–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan G (2006) Images of Organization (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Napier NP, Keil M, Tan FB (2009) IT project managers' construction of successful project management practice: A repertory grid investigation. Inform. Systems J. 19(3):255–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nidumolu S (1995) The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Inform. Systems Res. 6(3):191–219.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nidumolu SR, Knotts GW (1998) The effects of customizability and reusability on perceived process and competitive performance of software firms. MIS Quart. 22(2):105–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Odekerken-Schröder G, van Birgelen M, Lemmink J, de Ruyter K, Wetzels M (2000) Moments of sorrow and joy: An empirical assessment of the complementary value of critical incidents in understanding customer service evaluations. Eur. J. Marketing 34(1/2):107–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3): 249–273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pich MT, Loch CH, De Meyer A (2002) On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Sci. 48(8):1008–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L, Zenger T (1998) Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge based, and measurement explanations for make or buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Project Management Institute (2008) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th ed. (Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA).Google Scholar
  • Rai A, Maruping LM, Venkatesh V (2009) Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quart. 33(3):617–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramasubbu N, Mithas S, Krishnan MS, Kemerer CF (2008) Work dispersion, process-based learning, and offshore software development performance. MIS Quart. 32(2):437–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Hoyt DW (2007) Infosys: Building a talent engine to sustain growth. Stanford Graduate School of Business Case, HR30-PDF-ENG (Harvard Business Publishing, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schwalbe K (2013) Information Technology Project Management, 7th ed. (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Shenhar AJ (2001) One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Sci. 47(3):394–414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1981) Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Simon HA (1997) Administrative Behavior, 4th ed. (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Slaughter SA, Ang S, Fong Boh W (2007) Firm-specific human capital and compensation organizational tenure profiles: An archival analysis of salary data for information technology professionals. Human Resources Management 46(3):373–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slaughter SA, Levine L, Ramesh B, Pries-Heje J, Baskerville R (2006) Aligning software processes with strategy. MIS Quart. 30(4):891–918.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sternberg RJ (1985) Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Intelligence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL (2001) Practical intelligence and the principal. Yale University Publication Series 2. Laboratory for Student Success at the Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Sternberg RJ, Hedlund J (2002) Practical intelligence, g, and work psychology. Human Performance 15(1/2):143–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sternberg RJ, Wagner RK (1993) The g-ocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 2(1):1–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson EB, Beath CM (1990) Departmentalization in software development and maintenance. Comm. ACM 33(6):658–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Susarla A (2012) Contractual flexibility, rent seeking, and renegotiation design: An empirical analysis of information technology outsourcing contracts. Management Sci. 58(7):1388–1407.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tatikonda MV, Rosenthal SR (2000) Successful execution of product development projects: The effects of project management formality, autonomy and resource flexibility. J. Oper. Management 18(2000):401–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thite M (1999) Identifying key characteristics of technical project leadership. Leadership Organ. Development J. 20(5):253–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):423–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner RK, Sternberg RJ (1985) Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 49(2):436–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner RK, Sternberg RJ (1990) Street smarts. Clark KE, Clark MB, eds. Measure of Leadership (Leadership Library of America, West Orange, NJ), 493–504.Google Scholar
  • Wallace L, Keil M, Rai A (2004) How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sci. 35(2):289–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H (1980) A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams TM (1999) The need for new paradigms for complex projects. Internat. J. Project Management 17(5):269–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson OE (1979) Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. 22(2):233–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood RE (1986) Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(1):60–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Xia W, Lee G (2005) Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(1):45–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.