The “Most Popular News” Recommender: Count Amplification and Manipulation Resistance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0529

References

  • Adamic LA (2000) Zipf, power-laws, and pareto-a ranking tutorial. Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, CA. Accessed August 1, 2014, www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/ranking.Google Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Kwon Y (2012) Improving aggregate recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 24(5):896–911.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Wu K, Srinivasan V, Zhang X (2011) Battling the Internet water army: Detection of hidden paid posters. Proc. 2013 IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Advances Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM ‘13 (ACM, New York), 116–120.Google Scholar
  • Dellarocas C (2006) Strategic manipulation of Internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms. Management Sci. 52:1577–1593.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Deshpande M, Karypis G (2004) Item-based top-N recommendation algorithms. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 22:143–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Easley D, Kleinberg J (2010) Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economist, The (2011a) Mind for netiquette, or we’ll mind it for you. The Economist (December 7). http://www.economist.com/blogs/baggage/2011/12/web-censorship-india.Google Scholar
  • Economist, The (2011b) Bulletins from the future. The Economist (US) 400:3.Google Scholar
  • Eggenberger F, Pólya G (1923) Über die statistik verketteter vorgänge. ZAMM—J. Appl. Math. Mechanics/Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 3:279–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleder D, Hosanagar K (2009) Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Sci. 55:697–712.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Freedman DA (1965) Bernard Friedman’s urn. Ann. Math. Statist. 36:956–970.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herman B (2011) In the coming year, social media journalists will #Occupythenews. Accessed August 2, 2014, http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/12/burt-herman-in-2012-social-media-journalists-will-occupythenews/.Google Scholar
  • Kang J-H, Lerman K, Getoor L (2013) La-LDA: A limited attention topic model for social recommendation. Proc. 6th Internat. Conf. Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction, SBP ‘13 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 211–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22:79–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Largillier T, Peyronnet G, Peyronnet S (2010) Spotrank: A robust voting system for social news websites. Proc. 4th Workshop Inform. Credibility, WICOW ‘10 (ACM, New York), 59–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee JS, Zhu D (2012) Shilling attack detection—A new approach for a trustworthy recommender system. INFORMS J. Comput. 24:117–131.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lerman K (2007a) User participation in social media: Digg study. Proc. 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM Internat. Conf. Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshop, WI-IATW ‘07 (IEEE Comput. Soc., Washington, DC), 255–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerman K (2007b) Social information processing in news aggregation. IEEE Internet Comput. 11:16–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linden G, Smith B, York J (2003) Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput. 7:76–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loretta C, Brian S (2011) Beijing tightens cyber control. Wall Street Journal (December 17). Accessed August 1, 2014, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970204643804577101522579231922.Google Scholar
  • Maroulis S, Guimerà R, Petryet Het al. (2010) Complex systems view of educational policy research. Science 330:38–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers DJ (2000) The diffusion of collective violence: Infectiousness, susceptibility, and mass media networks. Amer. J. Sociology 106:173–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf’s law. Contemporary Phys. 46:323–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips D (1974) The influence of suggestion on suicide: Substantive and theoretical implications of the Werther effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 39:340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Resnick P, Sami R (2007) The influence limiter: Provably manipulation-resistant recommender systems. Proc. 2007 ACM Conf. Recommender Systems, RecSys ‘07 (ACM, New York), 25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Resnick P, Sami R (2008) The information cost of manipulation-resistance in recommender systems. Proc. 2008 ACM Conf. Recommender Systems, RecSys ‘08 (ACM, New York), 147–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM (1976) New product adoption and diffusion. J. Consumer Res. 2:290–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311:854–856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. J. Math. Sociology 1:143–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Roy B, Yan X (2010) Manipulation robustness of collaborative filtering. Management Sci. 56:1911.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Warren J, Jurgensen J (2007) The wizards of buzz. Wall Street Journal (February 11). Accessed August 1, 2014, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB117106531769704150.Google Scholar
  • Weber TE (2010) Cracking the New York Times popularity code. Daily Beast (December 19). http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2010/12/20/how-to-crack-the-new-york-times-most-emailed-list.html.Google Scholar
  • Ziegler C-N, McNee SM, Konstan JA, Lausen G (2005) Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. Proc. 14th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, WWW ‘05 (ACM, New York), 22–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.