Research Commentary—Using Income Accounting as the Theoretical Basis for Measuring IT Productivity

References

• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1995) Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 3(3–4):183–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):793–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulkley N, Van Alstyne M (2004) Why information should influence productivity. Castells M, ed. Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 145–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Nault BR (2007) Industry level supplier-driven IT spillovers. Management Sci. 53(8):1199–1216.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Nault BR (2012) Relative industry concentration and customer-driven IT spillovers. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):340–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer KL, Melville N (2010) Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):392–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen AJ, Harcourt GC (2003) Whatever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies? J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):199–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Kraemer KL (2000) Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Sci. 46(4):548–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Min C (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm-levelanalysis. Management Sci. 43(12):1660–1675.Link, Google Scholar
• Felipe J (2000) On the myth and mystery of Singapore’s “Zero TFP.” Asian Econom. J. 14(2):187–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felipe J (2001) Aggregate production functions and the measurement of infrastructure productivity: A reassessment. Eastern Econom. J. 27(3):323–344.Google Scholar
• Felipe J, McCombie JSL (2001) The CES production function, the accounting identity, and Occam’s razor. Appl. Econom. 33(10):1221–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher FM (1971) Aggregate production functions and the explanations of wages: A simulation experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 53(4):305–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster L, Haltiwanger J, Syverson C (2008) Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: Selection on productivity or profitability? Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):394–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani V, Melville N, Kraemer KL (2000) The production of information services: A firm-level analysis of information systems budgets. Inform. Systems Res. 11(2):159–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Tambe P (2006) Measuring spillovers from information technology investments. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Milwaukee, 1793–1802.Google Scholar
• Jorgenson DW, Griliches Z (1967) The explanation of productivity change. Rev. Econom. Stud. 34(3):249–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee B, Barua A (1999) An integrated assessment of productivity and efficiency impacts of information technology investments: Old data, new analysis and evidence. J. Productivity Anal. 12(1):21–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leontief WW (1947a) A note on the interrelationship of subsets of independent variables of a continuous function with continuous first derivatives. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 53(4):343–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leontief WW (1947b) Introduction to a theory of the internal structure of functional relationships. Econometrica 15(4):361–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levi MD (1973) Errors in the variables bias in the presence of correctly measured variables. Econometrica 41(5):985–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg FR (1995) The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 3(3–4):201–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon NM, Lee B, Eldenberg L (2000) Productivity of information systems in the healthcare industry. Inform. Systems Res. 11(1):83–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Mittal N, Nault BR (2009) Investments in information technology: Indirect effects and information technology intensity. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Nataf A (1948) Sur la possibilite de construction de certains macromodeles. Econometrica 16(3):205–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliner SD, Sichel DE (2000) The resurgence of growth in the late 1990's: Is information technology the story? J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson J (1953-54) The production function and the theory of capital. Rev. Econom. Stud. 21(1):81–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1962) Parable and realism in capital theory—The surrogate production function. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1979) Paul Douglas’s measurement of production functions and marginal productivities. J. Political Econom. 87(5):923–939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikh A (1974) Laws of production and laws of algebra: The humbug production function. Rev. Econom. Statist. 56(1):115–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1979) On parsimonious explanations of production relations. Scandinavian J. Econom. 81(4):459–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solow R (1974) Laws of production and laws of algebra: The humbug production function: Comment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 56(1):121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solow R (1987) Second thoughts on growth theory. Steinherr A, Weiserbs D, eds. Employment and Growth: Issues for the 1980s (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solow RM (1955–56) The production function and the theory of capital. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23(2):101–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sraffa P (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE (1974) The Cambridge–Cambridge controversy in the theory of capital: A view from New Haven: A Review. J. Political Econom. 82(4):893–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiroh KJ (2002) Information technology and the U.S. productivity revival: What do the industry data say? Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1559–1576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strassner EH, Medeiros GW, Smith GM (2005) Annual industry accounts: Introducing KLEMS input estimates for 1997–2003. Survey of Current Business 85(September):31–39.Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM (2010) Job hopping, knowledge spillovers, and regional returns to information technology investments. Sabherwal R, Summer M, eds. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• van Garderen KJ, Lee K, Pesaran MH (2000) Cross-sectional aggregation of non-linear models. J. Econometrics 95(2):285–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walters AA (1963) Production and cost functions: An econometric survey. Econometrica 31(1–2):1–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whelan K (2002) A guide to U.S. chain aggregated NIPA data. Rev. Income Wealth 48(2):217–233.Crossref, Google Scholar