Information Infrastructure Development and Governance as Collective Action

References

• Adler-Milstein J, McAfee AP, Bates DW, Jha AK (2008) The state of regional health information organizations: Current activities and financing. Health Affairs 27(1):60–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axelrod R, Mitchell W, Thomas RE, Bennett DS, Burderer E (1995) Coalition formation in standard-setting alliances. Management Sci. 41(9):1493–1508.Link, Google Scholar
• Azad B, Faraj S (2011) Social power and information technology implementation: A contentious framing lens. Inform. Systems J. 21(1):33–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Heracleous L, Walsham G (2013) A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: Reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements. MIS Quart. 37(1):201–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bekkers R, Duysters G, Verspagen B (2002) Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: Case of GSM. Res. Policy 31(7):1141–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benford RD, Snow DA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 26(1): 611–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowker G, Star SL (1999) Sorting Things Out (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braa J, Monteiro E, Sahay S (2004) Networks of action: Sustainable health information systems across developing countries. MIS Quart. 28(3):337–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadbent M, Weill P, St. Clair D (1999) The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quart. 23(2):159–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caloghirou Y, Constantelou A, Vonortas N (2006) Knowledge Flows in European Industry (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciborra CU (2000) From alignment to loose coupling: From mednet to www.roche.com. Ciborra CU, Braa K, Cordella A, Dahlbom B, Failla A, Hanseth O, Hepsø V, Ljungberg J, Monteiro E, Simon KA, eds. From Control to Drift—The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 193–211.Google Scholar
• Ciborra CU (2001) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Comité Européen de Normalisation, Technical Committee 251 (CEN/TC 251, 1995). Medical Informatics: Healthcare Information System Architecture. European Pre-standard CEN/TC251/WG1/PT1-013, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Constantinides P (2012) Perspectives and Implications for the Development of Information Infrastructures (IGI Global, Hershey, PA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantinides P, Barrett M (2006) Negotiating ICT development and use. Inform. Organ. 16(1):27–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Currie WL, Guah M (2007) Conflicting institutional logics: A national program for IT in the organisational field of healthcare. J. Inform. Tech. 22(3):235–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David PA, Greenstein S (1990) The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 1(1):3–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson E (2002) Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quart. 26(4):329–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson E (2006) A technological frames perspective on information technology and organizational change. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 42(1):23–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean J, Sharfman M (1996) Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 39(2):368–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denzin N, Lincoln Y (2005) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3):273–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652):1907–1912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagleton T (1991) Ideology: An Introduction (Verso Press, London).Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliott M, Kraemer K (2008) Computerization Movements and Technology Diffusion: From Mainframes to Ubiquitous Computing (Information Today, Medford, NJ).Google Scholar
• European Commission (1993) Growth, competitiveness, employment: The challenges and ways forward into the 21st century. White Paper, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
• European Commission (1994) Europe’s way to the information society. An action plan. White paper, European Commission, Brussels, http://www.echo.lu/eudocs/en/com-asc.html.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2000) An information society for all: eEurope action plan. White paper, European Commission, Brussels, http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/information_society/strategies/l24221_en.htm.Google Scholar
• Fabri M (2009) E-justice in Finland and in Italy: Enabling versus constraining models. Contini F, Lanzara GF, eds. ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector: European Studies in the Making of E-Government (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK), 115–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foray D (1994) Users, standards and the economics of coalitions and committee. Inform. Econom. Policy 6(3–4):269–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gomm R (2004) Social Research Methodology: A Critical Introduction (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Greek Ministry of National Economy (2000) Operational Programme for the Information Society, Athens, Greece. White paper, http://www.infosoc.gr/infosoc/en-UK/epktp/Page2.htm.Google Scholar
• Greenstein S (1992) Invisible hands and visible advisors: An economic interpretation of standardization. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 43(8):538–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Hinings CR, Suddaby R (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. 45(1):58–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guba E, Lincoln YS (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Hanseth O (2001) The economics of standards. Ciborra CU, ed. From Control to Drift: the Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 56–70.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Aanestad M (2003) Design as bootstrapping. On the evolution of ICT networks in health care. Methods Inform. Medicine 42(4):385–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. 25(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Monteiro E (1998) Understanding information infrastructure. Unpublished manuscript, http://heim.ifi.uio.no/∼oleha/Publications/bok.html.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Jacucci E, Grisot M, Aanestad M (2006) Reflexive standardization: Side effects and complexity in standard making. MIS Quart. 30(August):563–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargrave TJ, Van De Ven AH (2006) A collective action model of institutional innovation. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):864–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellenic Republic (1995) Greek strategy for the information society: A tool for employment, development and quality of life. White Paper, Hellenic Republic, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
• Hellenic Republic (1999) Greece in the information society: Strategy and actions. White Paper, Hellenic Republic, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quart. 37(3):907–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henningsson S, Henriksen HZ (2011) Inscription of behaviour and flexible interpretation in information infrastructures: The case of European e-customs. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 20(4): 355–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess C, Ostrom E (2007) Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC (1995) Open Distributed Processing—Reference Model. Part 3: Architecture. IS 10746-3/ITU-T Recommendation X.903. White paper, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), http://www.freestd.us/soft/25535.htm.Google Scholar
• Kling R, Iacono S (1995) Computerization movements and the mobilization of support for computerization. Starr SL, ed. Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology (State University of New York Press, New York), 119–153.Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorising from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin A, Silva L (2005) The social and political construction of technological frames. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 14(1):49–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus L, Steinfield C, Wigand R (2006) Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: The case of the US residential mortgage industry. MIS Quart. 30(August):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus L, Dutta A, Steinfield CW, Wigand RT (2008) The computerization movement in the US home mortgage industry: Automated underwriting from 1980 to 2004. Elliott MS, Kraemer KL eds. Computerization Movements and Technology Diffusion: From Mainframes to Ubiquitous Computing (Information Today Inc., Medford, NJ), 115–144.Google Scholar
• McGinnis M (1999) Polycentric Governance and Development: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge P, Fulk J, Kalman M, Flanagin A, Parnassa C, Rumsey S (1998) Production of collective action in alliance-based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organ. Sci. 9(3):411–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Monteiro E (1998) Scaling information infrastructure: The case of the next generation IP in Internet. Inform. Soc. 14(3):229–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteiro E (2001) Actor-network theory and information infrastructure. Ciborra CU, ed. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 71–83.Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Hanseth O (1995) Social shaping of information infrastructure: On being specific about the technology. Orlikowski WJ, Walsham G, Jones MR, DeGross JII, eds. Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work (Chapman & Hall, London), 325–343.Google Scholar
• Nickerson JV, zur Muehlen M (2006) The ecology of standards processes. MIS Quart. 30(August):467–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver PE, Marwell G (2001) Whatever happened to critical mass theory? A retrospective and assessment. Sociol. Theory 9(3):292–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver PE, Marwell G, Teixeira R (1985) A theory of critical mass. Part 1—Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):522–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1996) Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy and development. World Development 24(6):1073–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2003) How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. J. Theoret. Politics 15(3):239–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2010) Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environ. Change 20(4):550–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14(August): 399–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock N, Williams R, D’Adderio L (2007) Global software and its provenance: Generification work in the production of organizational software packages. Soc. Stud. Sci. 37(2):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prince K, Barrett M, Oborn E (2014) Dialogical strategies for orchestrating strategic innovation networks: The case of the Internet of things. Inform. Organ. 24(2):106–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahay S, Walsham G (1996) Implementation of GIS in India: Organizational issues and implications. Internat. J. Geographical Inform. Systems 10(4):385–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahay S, Monteiro E, Aanestad M (2009) Configurable politics and asymmetric integration: Health e-infrastructures in India. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(5):399–414.Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Zmud R (1999) Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. 23(2):261–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott SV, Walsham G (1998) Shifting boundaries and new technologies: A case study in the UK banking sector. Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Helsinki, Finland, 177–187.Google Scholar
• Star SL, Ruhleder K (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):111–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Suchman M (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J (1984) Studies in the Theory of Ideology (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JB (1990) Ideology and Modern Culture (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Camp J (2004) Looking to the Internet for models of governance. Ethics Inform. Tech. 6(3):161–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weill P, Aral S (2006) Generating premium returns on your IT investments. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(2):38–48.Google Scholar
• Weill P, Broadbent M (1998) Leveraging the New Infrastructure (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Weill P, Ross J (2004) IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Weiss M, Cargill CF (1992) Consortia in the standards development process. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 43(8):559–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J (2007) The economic realities of open standards: Black, white, and many shades of gray. Greenstein S, Stango V, eds. Standards and Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 87–122.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar