Turnover or Turnaway? Competing Risks Analysis of Male and Female IT Professionals’ Job Mobility and Relative Pay Gap

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0558

References

  • Adya MP (2008) Women at work: Differences in IT career experiences and perceptions between South Asian and American women. Human Resource Management 47(3):601–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja MK (2002) Women in the information technology profession: A literature review, synthesis and research agenda. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 11(1):20–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P (1984) Event History Analysis (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison PD (1995) Survival Analysis Using SAS®: A Practical Guide (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).Google Scholar
  • Ang S, Slaughter S, Ng KY (2002) Human capital and institutional determinants of information technology compensation: Modeling multilevel and cross-level interactions. Management Sci. 48(11):1427–1445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ashcraft C, Blithe S (2009) Women in IT: The Facts (National Center for Women & Information Technology, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
  • Bangerter A, Roulin N, Konig CJ (2012) Personnel selection as a signaling game. J. Appl. Psych. 97(4):719–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G (1975) Human Capital (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Blau FD, Kahn LM (1981) Race and sex differences in quits by young workers. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 34(4):563–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau FD, Kahn LM (2003) Understanding international differences in the gender pay gap. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):106–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau G, Tatum D (2000) Correlates of perceived gender discrimination for female versus male medical technologists. Sex Roles 43(1–2):105–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Budig MJ (2002) Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass escalator? Soc. Problems 49(2):258–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2008) National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 User Guide (U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2009) Consumer Price Index—All Urban Consumers (U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013a) Current population survey: Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013b) Current population survey: Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers by detailed occupation and sex. U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Carless SA, Arnup JL (2011) A longitudinal study of the determinants and outcomes of career change. J. Vocational Behav. 78(1):80–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohoon JM, Aspray W (2006) Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA (2008) Two decades of organizational justice: Findings, controversies, and future directions. Barling J, Cooper CL, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1 (Sage, London), 73–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 34(2):187–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crocker J, Major B, Steele C (1998) Social stigma. Fiske S, Gilbert D, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, Boston), 504–553.Google Scholar
  • Cronbach LJ (1958) Proposals leading to analytic treatment of social perception scores. Tagiuri R, Petrullo L, eds. Person Perception and Interpersonal Behavior (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 353–379.Google Scholar
  • Dickter DN, Roznowski M, Harrison DA (1996) Temporal tempering: An event history analysis of the process of voluntary turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 81(6):705–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Direnzo MS, Greenhaus JH (2011) Job search and voluntary turnover in a boundaryless world: A control theory perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):567–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan OD (1961) A socioeconomic index for all occupations. Albert J, Reiss J, eds. Occupation and Social Status (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • England P, Allison P, Wu YX (2007) Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize, does feminization reduce pay, and how can we tell with longitudinal data? Social Sci. Res. 36(3):1237–1256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enns HG, Ferratt TW, Prasad J (2006) Beyond stereotypes of IT professionals: Implications for IT HR practices. Comm. ACM 49(4):105–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flores LG, Zheng W, Rau D, Thomas CH (2012) Organizational learning: Subprocess identification, construct validation, and an empirical test of cultural antecedents. J. Management 38(2):640–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galizzi M (2001) Gender and labor attachment: Do within-firms’ relative wages matter? Indust. Relations 40(4):591–619.Google Scholar
  • Galizzi M, Lang K (1998) Relative wages, wage growth, and quit behavior. J. Labor Econom. 16(2):367–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ganzach Y (1998) Intelligence and job satisfaction. Acad. Management J. 41(5):526–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gathmann C, Schonberg U (2010) How general is human capital? A task-based approach. J. Labor Econom. 28(1):1–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerhart B (1987) How important are dispositional factors as determinants of job satisfaction? Implications for job design and other personnel programs. J. Appl. Psych. 72(3):366–373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerhart B, Rynes S (2003) Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications (Sage Publications, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gorman EH (2005) Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(4):702–728.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J (1987) A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):9–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S (2000) A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J. Management 26(3):463–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta ND, Oaxaca RL, Smith N (2006) Swimming upstream, floating downstream: Comparing women’s relative wage progress in the United States and Denmark. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 59(2):243–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harlos K (2010) If you build a remedial voice mechanism, will they come? Determinants of voicing interpersonal mistreatment at work. Human Relations 63(3):311–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR (1998) Research, development, and engineering metrics. Management Sci. 44(12):1670–1689.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heilman M, Wallen A, Fuchs D, Tamkins M (2004) Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-types tasks. J. Appl. Psych. 89(3):416–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hom PW, Roberson L, Ellis AD (2008) Challenging conventional wisdom about who quits: Revelations from corporate America. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosmer D, Lemeshow S (1999) Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data (John Wiley & Sons, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hulin CL, Roznowski M, Hachiya D (1985) Alternative opportunities and withdrawal decisions: Empirical and theoretical discrepancies and an integration. Psych. Bull. 97(2):233–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Information Technology Association of America (2005) ITAA Diversity Study: Numbers of Women, Minorities in Tech Too Low (Information Technology Association of America, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
  • Joseph D, Koh SK, Foo A (2010) Sustainable IT human capital: Coping with the threat of professional obsolescence. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, St. Louis).Google Scholar
  • Joseph D, Tan ML, Ang S (2011) Is updating play or work? The mediating role of updating orientation in linking threat of professional obsolescence to turnover/turnaway intentions. Internat. J. Soc. Organ. Dynam. 1(4):37–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joseph D, Boh WF, Ang S, Slaughter SA (2012) The career paths less (or more) traveled: A sequence analysis of IT career histories, mobility patterns, and career success. MIS Quart. 36(2):427–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joseph D, Ng KY, Koh SKC, Ang S (2007) Turnover of information technology professionals: A narrative review, meta-analytic structural equation modeling, and model development. MIS Quart. 31(3):547–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalev A (2009) Cracking the glass cages? Restructuring and ascriptive inequality at work. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(6):1591–1643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kambourov G, Manovskii I (2009) Occupational mobility and wage inequality. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(2):731–759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly JR, McGrath JE (1988) On Time and Method (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirschenbaum A, Weisberg J (2002) Employee’s turnover intentions and job destination choices. J. Organ. Behav. 23(1):109–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kulik CT, Roberson L, Perry EL (2007) The multiple-category problem: Category activation and inhibition in the hiring process. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):529–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee TH, Gerhart B, Weller I, Trevor CO (2008) Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Acad. Management J. 51(4):651–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leventman PG (2007) Multiple pathways toward gender equity in the U.S. information technology workforce. Burger CJ, Creamer EG, Meszaros PS, eds. Reconfiguring the Firewall: Recruiting Women to Information Technology Across Cultures and Continents (AK Peters, Wellesley, MA), 211–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N, Xin M (2007) Comparing IT workers’ compensation across country contexts: Demographic, human capital and institutional factors. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):193–210.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levine DI (1993) What do wages buy? Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):462–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin DY, Wei LJ (1989) The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 84(408):1074–1078.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Major B, O’Brien LT (2005) The social psychology of stigma. Annual Rev. Psych. 56:393–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maltarich MA, Nyberg AJ, Reilly G (2010) A conceptual and empirical analysis of the cognitive ability-voluntary turnover relationship. J. Appl. Psych. 95(6):1058–1070.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Margolis J, Fisher A (2002) Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maxwell NL (1987) Occupational differences in the determination of U.S. workers’ earnings: Both the human capital and the structured labor market hypotheses are useful in analysis. Amer. J. Econom. Sociol. 46(4):431–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer RC, Schoorman FD (1998) Differentiating antecedents of organizational commitment: A test of March and Simon’s model. J. Organ. Behav. 19(1):15–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDuff EM, Mueller CW (2000) The ministry as an occupational labor market: Intentions to leave an employer (church) versus intentions to leave a profession (ministry). Work Occupations 27(1):89–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mincer J (1974) Schooling, Experience, and Earnings (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2008) Human capital and institutional effects in the compensation of information technology professionals in the United States. Management Sci. 54(3):415–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Møen J (2005) Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers? J. Labor Econom. 23(1):81–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore JE, Burke LA (2002) How to turn around “turnover culture” in IT. Comm. ACM 45(2):73–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morello D (2012) CEO Survey 2012: Talent Concerns Permeate CEO Objectives (Gartner Inc., Stamford, CT).Google Scholar
  • Morita JG, Lee TW, Mowday RT (1989) Introducing survival analysis to organizational researchers: A selected application to turnover research. J. Appl. Psych. 74(2):280–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morita JG, Lee TW, Mowday RT (1993) The regression-analog to survival analysis—A selected application to turnover research. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1430–1464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Science Board (2014) Science and Engineering Indicators 2014 (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
  • Nembhard IM, Tucker AL (2011) Deliberate learning to improve performance in dynamic service settings: Evidence from hospital intensive care units. Organ. Sci. 22(4):907–922.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peters LH, Sheridan JE (1988) Turnover research methodology: A critique of traditional designs and a suggested survival model alternative. Res. Personnel Human Resources Management 6:231–262.Google Scholar
  • Pfeifer C, Schneck S (2012) Relative wage positions and quit behavior: Evidence from linked employer-employee data. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 65(1):126–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polivka AE (1996) Contingent and alternative work arrangements defined. Monthly Labor Rev. 119(10):3–9.Google Scholar
  • Reich BH, Kaarst-Brown ML (1999) “Seeding the line”: Understanding the transition from IT to non-IT careers. MIS Quart. 23(3):337–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reich BH, Kaarst-Brown ML (2003) Creating social and intellectual capital through IT career transitions. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 12(4):91–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reid MF, Allen MW, Armstrong DJ, Riemenschneider CK (2010) Perspectives on challenges facing women in IS: The cognitive gender gap. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 19(5):526–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reskin BF (1988) Bringing the men back in: Sex differentiation and the devaluation of women’s work. Gender Soc. 2(1):58–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reskin BF, McBrier DB, Kmec JA (1999) The determinants and consequences of workplace sex and race composition. Annual Rev. Sociology 25:335–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richards E, Terkanian D (2013) Occupational Employment Projections to 2022. Monthly Labor Rev. www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/occupational-employment-projections-to-2022.htm.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridgeway CL (1997) Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(2):218–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudman LA, Phelan JE (2008) Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Brief AP, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28 (Elsevier, New York), 61–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumacher EJ (1997) Relative wages and exit behavior among registered nurses. J. Labor Res. 18(4):581–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Serva MA (1994) The Effects of High Demand Information Technology on the Equity Perceptions of Systems Analysts: A Field Study (University of Texas, Austin, TX).Google Scholar
  • Singer JD, Willett JB (1991) Modeling the days of our lives: Using survival analysis when designing and analyzing longitudinal studies of duration and the timing of events. Psych. Bull. 110(2):268–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slaughter S, Ang S, Boh WF (2007) Firm-specific human capital and compensation-organizational tenure profiles: An archival analysis of salary data for IT professionals. Human Resource Management 46(3):373–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sturman MC, Walsh K, Cheramie RA (2008) The value of human capital specificity versus transferability. J. Management 34(2):290–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tekleab AG, Bartol KM, Liu W (2005) Is it pay levels or pay raises that matter to fairness and turnover? J. Organ. Behav. 26(8):899–921.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomaskovic-Devey D, Skaggs S (2002) Sex segregation, labor process organization, and gender earnings inequality. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(1):102–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trauth EM, Quesenberry JL, Huang H (2009) Retaining women in the U.S. IT workforce: Theorizing the influence of organizational factors. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(5):476–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trevor CO (2001) Interactions among actual ease-of-movement determinants and job satisfaction in the prediction of voluntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 44(4):621–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trevor CO, Nyberg AJ (2008) Keeping your headcount when all about you are losing theirs: Downsizing, voluntary turnover rates, and the moderating role of HR practices. Acad. Management J. 51(2):259–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Triana MD (2011) A woman’s place and a man’s duty: How gender role incongruence in one’s family life can result in home-related spillover discrimination at work. J. Bus. Psych. 26(1):71–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Census Bureau (1971) 1970 Census of Population Classified Index of Industries and Occupations (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • U.S. Census Bureau (2003) 2003 Standard Occupation Classification (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Viscusi WK (1980) Sex differences in worker quitting. Rev. Econom. Statist. 62(3):388–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vogt CM (2008) The continuing technological revolution: A comparison of three regions’ strategies for creating women-inclusive workplaces. Watt HMG, Eccles JS, eds. Gender and Occupational Outcomes (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel C, Issa M, Ma R, Stokes A (2011) Stereotype threat: Antecedents and consequences for working women. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 41(2):151–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wanous JP, Reichers AE, Hudy MJ (1997) Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? J. Appl. Psych. 82(2):247–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Younts CW, Mueller CW (2001) Justice processes: Specifying the mediating role of perceptions of distributive justice. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(1):125–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.