Research Commentary—Information Technology Substitution Revisited

References

• Allen RGD (1938) Why information should influence productivity. Mathematical Analysis for Economists (St. Martin’s, New York).Google Scholar
• Amado C, Terasvirta T (2013) Modelling volatility by variance decomposition. J. Econom. 175(2):142–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett W (2002) Tastes and technology: Curvature is not sufficient for regularity. J. Econometrics 108(1):199–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett W, Pasupathy M (2003) Regularity of the generalized quadratic production model: A counterexample. Econometric Rev. 22(2):135–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berndt R, Rappaport N (2002) Price and quality of desktop and mobile personal computers: A quarter century historical overview. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):268–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackorby C, Russell R (1981) The Morishma elasticity of substitution; symmetry, constancy, separability, and its relationship to the Hicks and Allen elasticities. Rev. Econom. Stud. 48(1):147–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackorby C, Russell R (1989) Will the real elasticity of substitution please stand up? (A comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima elasticities). Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(4):882–888.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business practices. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):793–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves D, Christensen L (1981) Global properties of the FFFs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70:422–432.Google Scholar
• Chambers RG (1988) Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Nault BR (2007) Industry level supplier-driven IT spillovers. Management Sci. 53(8):1199–1216.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Nault BR (2012) Relative industry concentration and customer-driven IT spillovers. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):340–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Chun H, Mun S (2006) Substitutability and accumulation of information technology capital in U.S. industries. Southern Econom. J. 72(4):1002–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer KL, Melville N (2010) Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):392–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Coelli TJ, Prasada Rao DS, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Min C (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level-analysis. Management Sci. 43(12):1660–1675.Link, Google Scholar
• Diewert W, Wales T (1987) FFFs and global curvature conditions. Econometrica 55(1):43–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Pastorello S, Renault E (2007) Maximization by parts in extremum estimation. Working paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
• Farrell D (2003) The real new economy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (October):105–112.Google Scholar
• Gallant A, Golub E (1984) Imposing curvature restrictions on FFFs. J. Econometrics 26:295–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hicks J (1932) The Theory of Wages, 2nd ed. (MacMillian, London).Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Snir E (1999) The role of information technology in modern production: Complement or substitute to other inputs? Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Jorgenson D, Fraumeni BM (1981) Relative prices and technical change. Berndt E, Field B, eds. Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 17–47.Google Scholar
• Kudyna S, Diwan R (2002) Increasing returns to information technology. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):104–111.Link, Google Scholar
• Lau L (1978) Testing and imposing monotonicity, convexity and quasiconvexity constraints. Fuss M, McFadden D, eds. Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 409–453.Google Scholar
• Mittal N, Nault BR (2009) Investments in information technology: Indirect effects and information technology intensity. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Morey E (1986) An introduction to checking, testing, and imposing curvature properties: The true function and the estimated function. Canadian J. Econom. 19(2):207–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morishima M (1967) Danryokusei Rison ni kansuru Ni-san no Teian (A few suggestions on the theory of elasticity). Keizai Hyoron (Economic Review, Tokyo) 16:144–150.Google Scholar
• Moschini G (1999) Imposing local curvature conditions in flexible demand system. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 17:487–490.Google Scholar
• Mundra K, Russell RR (2004) Dual elasticity of substitution. Working paper, San Diego State University, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Nordhaus D (2002) Productivity growth and the new economy. Brookings Paper Econom. Activity 2:201–217.Google Scholar
• O’Donnell C, Coelli T (2005) A Bayesian approach to imposing curvature on distance functions. J. Econometrics 126:493–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollak R, Sickles R, Wales T (1984) The CES-Translog: Specification and estimation of a new cost function. Rev. Econom. Statist. 66:602–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan D, Wales T (1998) A simple method for imposing local curvature in some flexible consumer-demand system. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 16(3):331–338.Google Scholar
• Salvanes K, Tjotta S (1998) A note on the importance of testing for regularities for estimated FFFs. J. Productivity Anal. 9:133–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solow R (1987) We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Rev. (July 12):36. Accessed April 14, 2015, http://www.standupeconomist.com/pdf/misc/solow-computer-productivity.pdf.Google Scholar
• Song PXK, Fan Y, Kalbfleisch JD (2005) Maximization by parts in likelihood inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100:1145–1157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM (2014) Job hopping, information technology spillovers, and productivity growth. Management Sci. 60(2):338–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Terrell D (1996) Incorporating monotonicity and concavity conditions in FFFs. J. Appl. Econometrics 11(2):179–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2006) Overview of capital inputs for the BLS multifactor productivity measures. Accessed April 14, 2015, http://www.bls.gov/mfp/mprcaptl.pdf.Google Scholar
• Uzawa H (1962) Production functions with constant elasticities of substitution. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29:291–299.Crossref, Google Scholar