Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0573

References

  • Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson T, Rubin H (1949) Estimators of the parameters of a single equation in a complete set of stochastic equations. Ann. Math. Statist. 20(1):570–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C (2008) Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Indust. Corporate Change 17(1):155–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C, Clark K (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C, Clark K (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in open source development? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C, Henkel J (2014) Modularity and intellectual property protection. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print April 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2303.Google Scholar
  • Barnett W, Hansen M (1996) The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. 17(1):139–157.Google Scholar
  • Basmann R (1960) On finite sample distributions of generalized classical linear identifiability test statistics. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 55(292):650–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Booth D (2010) Peer Participation and Software: What Mozilla has to Teach Government (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T, Greenstein S (2014) Mobile computing: The next platform rivalry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):475–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardinal L, Sitkin S, Long C (2004) Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organ. Sci. 15(4):411–431.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury V, Sabherwal R (2003) Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Inform. Systems Res. 14(3):291–314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K, Tabrizi B (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computing industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garen J (1984) The returns to schooling: A selectivity bias approach with a continuous choice variable. Econometrica 52(5):1199–1218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosh M, Dutta S, Stermersch S (2006) Customizing complex products: When should the vendor take control. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):664–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacobucci D (2008) Mediation Analysis (Sage, Los Angeles).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenny D, Kashy D, Bolger N (1998) Data analysis in social psychology. Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, Boston), 233–265.Google Scholar
  • Kirsch L, Sambamurthy V, Ko D, Purvis R (2002) Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Sci. 48(4):484–498.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacKinnon D, Lockwood C, Hoffman J, West S, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psych. Methods 7(1):83–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mendonca L, Sutton R (2008) Succeeding at open-source: An interview with Mozilla’s Mitchell Baker. McKinsey Quart. (January):1–7.Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
  • Mozilla (2014) Review process documentation. Accessed April 3, 2014, http://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/developers/docs/policies/reviews.Google Scholar
  • Mozilla Blog (2014) Add-on review process and you. Accessed April 3, 2014, http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2010/02/15/the-add-on-review-process-and-you.Google Scholar
  • Nambisan S (2002) Complementary product integration by high technology new ventures: The role of initial technology strategy. Management Sci. 48(3):382–398.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R (1995) Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J. Econom. Literature 33(1):48–90.Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W, Iacono S (2001) Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2):121–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W (1977) The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(1):95–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet J, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sah R, Stiglitz J (1986) The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
  • Sanchez R, Mahoney J (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product organization and design. Strategic Management J. 17(1):63–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
  • Simon H (2002) Near decomposability and the speed of evolution. Indust. Corporate Change 11(3):587–599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snell S (1992) A test of control theory in strategic human resource management. Acad. Management J. 35(2):292–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A (2008) Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing. Strategic Management J. 29(7):769–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4): 675–687.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):423–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wheelan C (2013) Naked Statistics (WW Norton, New York).Google Scholar
  • Zaheer S, Albert S, Zaheer A (1999) Time scales and organization theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):725–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.