Cable News Wars on the Internet: Competition and User-Generated Content

References

• Aitchison J, Ho CH (1989) The multivariate Poisson log normal distribution. Biometrika 76(4):643–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry T (1993) Twenty years of comparative advertising in the United States. Internat. J. Advertising 12(4):325–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blattberg RC, Wisniewski KJ (1989) Price-induced patterns of competition. Marketing Sci. 8(4):291–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Boehlert E (2009) Bloggers on the Bus: How the Internet Changed Politics and the Press (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Bolstad WM (2007) Bayesian process monitoring, control and optimization. Internat. Statist. Rev. 75(3):412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• CBSNews (2011) Before Super Bowl, Obama faces off with Fox. CBS (February 5). http://www.cbsnews.com/news/before-super-bowl-obama-faces-off-with-fox/.Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chib S, Winkelmann R (2001) Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis of correlated count data. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 19(4):428–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coe K, Tewksbury D, Bond BJ, Drogos KL, Porter RW, Yahn A, Zhang Y (2008) Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. J. Comm. 58(2):201–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daily Mail (2012) Help us spy on Twitter: FBI asks companies to develop software for monitoring social media to predict crimes. Daily Mail (January 30). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2092534/FBI-asks-companies-develop-software-monitoring-social-media-like-Twitter.html.Google Scholar
• Dou Y, Niculescu MF, Wu DJ (2013) Engineering optimal network effects via social media features and seeding in markets for digital goods and services. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):164–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Manchanda P (2005) Differences in dynamic brand competition across markets: An empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. 24(1):81–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Ebbes P, Wedel M, Böckenholt U (2009) Frugal-IV alternatives to identify the parameter for an endogeneous regressor. J. Appl. Econometrics 24(3):446–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebbes P, Wedel M, Böckenholt U, Steerneman T (2005) Solving and testing for regressor-error (in)dependence when no instrumental variables are available: With new evidence for the effect of education on income. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(4):365–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erickson GM (1985) A model of advertising competition. J. Marketing Res. 22(3):297–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erickson T, Whited TM (2002) Two-step estimation of the errors-in-variables model using high-order moments. Econometric Theory 18(3):776–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folkenflik D (2013) Murdoch’s World: The Last of the Old Media Empires (PublicAffairs Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Gilks W, Roberts G, Sahu S (1998) Adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo through regeneration. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 93(443):1045–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(1):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Silva JC (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Chandrashekaran M, Citrin AV (2010) Customer satisfaction heterogeneity and shareholder value. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):612–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen GJ, Kim H (2011) Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Comm. Res. Reports 28(2):169–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, Taylor WE (1983) Identification in linear simultaneous equations models with covariance restrictions: An instrumental variables interpretation. Econometrica 51(5):1527–1549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill K (2012) Could Target sell its “pregnancy prediction score”? Forbes (February 16). http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/could-target-sell-its-pregnancy-prediction-score.Google Scholar
• Karlis D, Meligkotsidou L (2007) Finite mixtures of multivariate Poisson distributions with application. J. Statist. Planning Inference 137(6):1942–1960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehrer J (2002) Cable news wars public broadcasting service. (March 5). http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/media-jan-june02-cable_3-5/.Google Scholar
• Libai B, Muller E, Peres R (2009) The role of within-brand and cross-brand communications in competitive growth. J. Marketing 73(3):19–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y (2006) Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J. Marketing 70(3):74–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Putler DS, Weinberg CB (2004) Is having more channels really better? A model of competition among commercial television broadcasters. Marketing Sci. 23(1):120–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Lukovitz K (2008) Kmart enlists bloggers to get the good word out. Mediapost (December 11). http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/96540/kmart-enlists-bloggers-to-get-the-good-word-out.html.Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(204):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D, Yoganarasimhan H (2012) Link to success: How blogs build an audience by promoting rivals. Management Sci. 58(9):1651–1668.Link, Google Scholar
• Naik P, Raman K, Winer R (2005) Planning marketing-mix strategies in the presence of interaction effects. Marketing Sci. 24(1):25–34.Link, Google Scholar
• Neelamegham R, Chintagunta P (1999) A Bayesian model to forecast new product performance in domestic and international markets. Marketing Sci. 18(2):115–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Netzer O, Feldman R, Goldenberg J, Fresko M (2012) Mine your own business: Market-structure surveillance through text mining. Marketing Sci. 31(3):521–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Pechmann C, Stewart D (1990) The effects of comparative advertising on attention, memory, and purchase intentions. J. Consumer Res. 17(2):180–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pew Research (2007) The state of the news media. Pew Res. Center http://stateofthemedia.org/2007/cable-tv-intro/public-attitude/.Google Scholar
• Pew Research (2009) Partisanship and cable news audiences. Pew Res. Center (October 30). http://www.pewresearch.org/2009/10/30/partisanship-and-cable-news-audiences/.Google Scholar
• Reddy S, Aronson J, Stam A (1998) SPOT: Scheduling programs optimally for television. Management Sci. 44(1):83–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi P, Allenby G (2003) Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. 22(3):304–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Alpert MI (1984) An audience flow model of television viewing choice/comment/response. Marketing Sci. 3(2):113–124.Link, Google Scholar
• Rust R, Eechambadi N (1989) Scheduling network television programs: A heuristic audience flow approach to maximizing audience share. J. Advertising 18(2):11–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutz OJ, Trusov M (2011) Zooming in on paid search ads-A consumer-level model calibrated on aggregated data. Marketing Sci. 30(5):789–800.Link, Google Scholar
• Sabnis G, Grewal R (2012) Competition and its implications for marketing strategy. Shankar V, Carpenter GS, eds. Handbook of Marketing Strategy (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 58–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer FM, Ross DR (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Market Performance (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Shachar R, Emerson J (2000) Cast demographics, unobserved segments, and heterogeneous switching costs in a television viewing choice model. J. Marketing Res. 37(2):173–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shocker AD, Bayus BL, Kim N (2004) Product complements and substitutes in the real world: The relevance of the “other products.” J. Marketing 68(1):28–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnier GP, McAlister L, Rutz OJ (2011) A dynamic model of the effect of online communications on firm sales. Marketing Sci. 30(4):702–716.Link, Google Scholar
• Speedy JD (2011) IBM uses social media to predict market trends. IT World Canada (November 21). http://www.itworldcanada.com/article/ibm-uses-social-media-to-predict-market-trends/45077.Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Haunschild P, Grewal R (2007) Vicarious learning in new product introductions in the early years of a converging market. Management Sci. 53(1):16–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20(4):518–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedel M, DeSarbo WS, Bult JR, Ramaswamy V (1993) A latent class Poisson regression model for heterogeneous count data. J. Appl. Econometrics 8(4):397–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur K (2008) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. 27(3):356–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilcox J (2008) I’m a PC: It’s viral now. MicrosoftWatch (September 24). http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/marketing/im_a_pc_its_viral_now.html.Google Scholar
• Woltman E, Josephine LCM, Wedel M, Pieters RGM (2003) Why do consumers stop viewing television commercials? Two experiments on the influence of moment-to-moment entertainment and information value. J. Marketing Res. 40(4):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wedel M, Pieters R (2009) Sales effects of attention to feature advertisements: A Bayesian mediation analysis. J. Marketing Res. 46(5):669–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang X (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar