Research Note—Migration of Service to the Internet: Evidence from a Federal Natural Experiment

References

• Agarwal R, Animesh A, Prasad K (2009) Social interactions and the “digital divide”: Explaining variations in Internet use. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):277–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Forman C, Yoon JW (2010) Complementarity and information technology adoption: Local area networks and the Internet. Inform. Econom. Policy 22(3):228–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd R, Seldon BJ (1990) The fleeting effect of advertising: Empirical evidence from a case study. Marketing Lett. 34(4):375–379.Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Riggins FJ (2005) The digital divide: Current and future research directions. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 6(12):298–337.Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Ganley D, Kraemer KL (2010) Complementarities in the diffusion of personal computers and the Internet: Implications for the global digital divide. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):925–940.Link, Google Scholar
• Fairlie RW (2006) The personal computer and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 52(2):187–203.Link, Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2003a) Amendment of solicitation/modification of contract, June 3. Accessed August 29, 2011, http://www.ftc.gov/foia/dnccontract.pdf.Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2003b) News flash: “National Do Not Call Registry,” Vol. 2, No. 6. Accessed August 29, 2011, http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/newsletters/fortheconsumer/2003/ftcv02n06.shtm.Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2003c) Do Not Call registrations top 12.5 million. Press release, July 1. Accessed June 14, 2015, https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2003/07/do-not-call-registrations-top-125-million.Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2003d) National Do Not Call Registry—Total registrations as of September 16, 2003. Accessed January 25, 2010, http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/09/030917dncstates.pdf.Google Scholar
• Forman C (2005) The corporate digital divide: Determinants of Internet adoption. Management Sci. 51(4):641–654.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Goldfarb A (2009) Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. 55(1):47–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. J. Urban Econom. 58(3):389–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh KY, Hui KL, Png IPL (2011) Newspaper report and consumer choice: Evidence from the Do Not Call Registry. Management Sci. 57(9):1640–1654.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldberger AS (1968) The interpretation and estimation of Cobb-Douglas functions. Econometrica 36(3/4):464–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Prince J (2008) Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide. Inform. Econom. Policy 20(1):2–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A, Klenow PJ (2002) Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers. J. Law Econom. 45(2):317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh JJP-A, Rai A, Keil M (2011) Addressing digital inequality for the socioeconomically disadvantaged through government initiatives: Forms of capital that affect ICT utilization. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):233–253.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen R (2007) The digital provide: Information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the south Indian fisheries sector. Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):879–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Telang R (2012) Does Web reduce customer service cost? Empirical evidence from a call center. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):721–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Lemieux T (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econom. Literature 48(2):281–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Times (2003) Millions rush to register on FTC “Do-Not-Call” list (July 1). http://articles.latimes.com/2003/jul/01/business/fi-call1.Google Scholar
• Triplett JE (1989) Price and technological change in a capital good: A survey of research on computers. Jorgenson D, Landau R, eds. Technology and Capital Formation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 127–213.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2003) Current population survey. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/cps/.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2012) Statistical abstract of the United States. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/.Google Scholar
• Varian H, Wallenberg F, Woroch G (2004) Who signed up for the Do-Not-Call list? Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Sykes TA (2013) Digital divide initiative success in developing countries: A longitudinal field study in a village in India. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):239–260.Link, Google Scholar
• Wei KK, Teo HH, Chan HC, Tan BCY (2011) Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):170–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2006) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 3rd ed. (Thomson Southwestern, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Xue M, Harker PT (2002) Customer efficiency: Concept and its impact on e-business management. J. Service Res. 4(4):253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xue M, Hitt LM, Harker PT (2007) Customer efficiency, channel usage and firm performance in retail banking. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):535–558.Link, Google Scholar