Discriminating IT Governance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0591

References

  • Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2002) Principles and models for organizing the IT function. MIS Quart. Executive 1(1):1–16.Google Scholar
  • Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alonso R, Dessein W, Matouschek N (2008) When does coordination require centralization? Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):145–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson T, Rubin H (1949) Estimators of the parameters of a single equation in a complete set of stochastic equations. Ann. Math. Statist. 20(1):570–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersson H, Kaplan J, Smolinski B (2012) Capturing value from IT infrastructure innovation. McKinsey Quart. (October):1–10.Google Scholar
  • Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5):763–780.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Roberts J (2001) Organizational design: Decision rights and incentive contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):200–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C (2008) Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Indust. Corporate Change 17(1):155–195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baschab J, Piot J (2003) The Executive’s Guide to Information Technology (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bassellier G, Benbasat I (2004) Business competence of information technology professionals: Conceptual development and influence on IT-business partnerships. MIS Quart. 28(4):673–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bassellier G, Benbasat I, Reich B (2003) The influence of business managers’ IT competence on championing IT. Inform. Systems Res. 14(4):317–336.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bassman R (1960) On finite sample distributions of generalized classical linear identifiability test statistics. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 55(292):650–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A (2008) How to tap IT’s hidden potential. Wall Street J. (March 10) http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB120467900166211989.Google Scholar
  • Becker G, Murphy K (1992) The division of labor, coordination, and knowledge. Quart. J. Econom. 107(4):1137–1160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bester H, Krähmer D (2008) Delegation and incentives. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):664–682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C (1997) Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Inform. Systems Res. 8(1):69–94.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C (1999) Horizontal mechanisms under differing IS organization contexts. MIS Quart. 23(3):421–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C, Magill S (1994) Alignment of the IS function with the enterprise: Toward a model of antecedents. MIS Quart. 18(4):371–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C, Magill S (1998) Reconceptualizing the context-design issue for the information systems function. Organ. Sci. 9(2):176–194.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Schrage M (2009) The new, faster face of innovation. Wall Street J. (August 17). http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204830304574130820184260340.Google Scholar
  • Bucciarelli L (1994) Designing Engineers (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Cramm S (2010) 8 Things We Hate About IT (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Demsetz H (1992) Comments: Specific and general knowledge, and organizational structure. Werin L, Wijkander H, eds. Contract Economics (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 275–281.Google Scholar
  • Dessein W, Garicano L, Gertner R (2010) Organizing for synergies. Amer. Econom. J. 2(4):77–114.Google Scholar
  • Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feld C, Stoddard D (2004) Getting IT right. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(2):72–81.Google Scholar
  • Garen J (1984) The returns to schooling: A selectivity bias approach with a continuous choice variable. Econometrica 52(5):1199–1218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garicano L (2000) Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. J. Political Econom. 108(5):874–904.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hann J, Weber R (1996) Information systems planning: A model and empirical tests. Management Sci. 42(7):1043–1064.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heller M (2012) The CIO Paradox: Battling the Contradictions of IT Leadership (Bibliomotion, Brookline, MA).Google Scholar
  • Iacobucci D (2008) Mediation Analysis (Sage, Los Angeles).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M, Meckling W (1992) Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. Werin L, Wijkander H, eds. Contract Economics (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 251–274.Google Scholar
  • Lewis B, Byrd T (2003) Development of a measure for the information technology infrastructure construct. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 12(2):93–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu Y, Ramamurthy K (2011) Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quart. 35(4):931–954.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath R (2013) The End of Competitive Advantage (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Messerschmitt D, Szyperski C (2003) Software Ecosystem (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Mitchell V (2006) Knowledge integration and information technology project performance. MIS Quart. 30(4):919–939.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nault B (1998) Information technology and organization design: Locating decisions and information. Management Sci. 44(10):1321–1335.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson KM, Cooprider JG (1996) The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quart. 20(4):409–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson M, Chervany N (1980) The relationship between organizational characteristics and the structure of the information services function. MIS Quart. 4(2):57–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranganathan C, Sethi V (2002) Rationality in strategic information technology decisions: The impact of shared domain knowledge and IT unit structure. Decision Sci. 33(1):59–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reich B, Benbasat I (2000) Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quart. 24(1):81–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross JW (2002) Six IT decisions your IT people shouldn’t make. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(11):84–95.Google Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V, Zmud R (1999) Arrangements for technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. 23(2):261–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2):237–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segars A, Grover V (1998) Strategic information systems planning: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quart. 22(2):139–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star S, Ruhleder K (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):111–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A (2008) Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance? A field study of software outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management J. 29(11):1241–1252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A, Keil M (2007) Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management J. 28(6):623–634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B (2010) Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):288–304.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):423–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P, Aral S (2006) Generating premium returns on your IT investments. Sloan Management Rev. 47(2):39–48.Google Scholar
  • Weill P, Ross J (2004) IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Weill P, Ross J (2005) A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. Sloan Management Rev. 46(2):26–34.Google Scholar
  • Weill P, Subramani M, Broadbent M (2002) Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. Sloan Management Rev. 44(1):57–65.Google Scholar
  • Xue L, Ray G, Gu B (2011) Environmental uncertainty and IT infrastructure governance: A curvilinear relationship. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):389–399.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xue Y, Liang H, Boulton W (2008) Information technology governance in information technology investment decision processes: The impact of investment characteristics, external environment, and internal context. MIS Quart. 32(1):67–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.