Designing Warning Messages for Detecting Biased Online Product Recommendations: An Empirical Investigation

References

• Aksoy L, Bloom PN (2001) Impact of ordered alternative lists on decision quality: The role of perceived similarity. Proc. Soc. Consumer Res. Winter Conf., Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar
• Angst CM, Agarwal R (2009) Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quart. 33(2):339–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argo JJ, Main KJ (2004) Meta-analyses of the effectiveness of warning labels. J. Public Policy Marketing 23(2):193–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banks SM, Salovey P, Greener S, Rothman AJ, Moyer A, Beauvais Jet al. (1995) The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psych. 14(2):178–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellman S, Johnson EJ, Lohse GL, Mandel N (2006) Designing marketplaces of the artificial with consumers in mind: Four approaches to understanding consumer behavior in electronic environments. J. Interactive Marketing 20(1):21–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biros DP (1998) The effects of truth bias on artifact-user relationships: An investigation of factors for improving deception detection in artifact produced information. Working paper, Florida State University, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
• Biros DP, George JF, Zmud RW (2002) Inducing sensitivity to deception in order to improve decision making performance: A field study. MIS Quart. 26(2):119–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Buller DB, Ebesu AS, Rockwell P (1994) Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detection. Comm. Monographs 61(4):303–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chau PY, Ho SY, Ho KK, Yao Y (2013) Examining the effects of malfunctioning personalized services on online users’ distrust and behaviors. Decision Support Systems 56(1):180–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng FF, Wu CS (2010) Debiasing the framing effect: The effect of warning and involvement. Decision Support Systems 49(3):328–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cosley D, Lam SK, Albert I, Konstan J, Riedl J (2003) Is seeing believing? How recommender systems influence users’ opinions. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 585–592.Google Scholar
• Davis DR, Parasuraman R (1981) The Psychology of Vigilance (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar
• Demery P (2013) Site personalization has room to grow among Top 500 retailers. Internet Retailer (May 15), http://www.internetretailer.com/2013/05/15/site-personalization-has-room-grow-among-top-500-retailers.Google Scholar
• Detweiler JB, Bedell BT, Salovey P, Pronin E, Rothman AJ (1999) Message framing and sun screen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psych. 18(2):189–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunn T (2007) Filter and sort: Improving ecommerce product findability. Webcredible (April 1), http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-usability/ecommerce-findability.shtml.Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1981) Acceptance, yielding, and impact: Cognitive processes in persuasion. Petty RE, Ostrom TM, Brock TC, eds. Cognitive Responses in Persuasion (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 339–359.Google Scholar
• George JF, Marett K (2004) Inhibiting detection and its detection. Proc. 37th Ann. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci (IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, HI).Google Scholar
• George JF, Marett K, Tilley P (2004) Deception detection under varying electronic media and warning conditions. Proc. 37th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, HI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerend MA, Sias T (2009) Message framing and color priming: How subtle threat cues affect persuasion. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):999–1002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grazioli S (2004) Where did they go wrong? An analysis of the failure of knowledgeable Internet consumers to detect deception over the Internet. Group Decision Negotiation 13(2):149–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grazioli S, Jarvenpaa SL (2000) Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics 30(4):395–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grazioli S, Jarvenpaa SL (2001) Tactics used against consumers as victims of Internet deception. Proc. Seventh Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Boston), Paper 158.Google Scholar
• Grazioli S, Jarvenpaa SL (2003a) Consumer and business deception on the Internet: Content analysis of documentary evidence. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 7(4):93–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grazioli S, Jarvenpaa SL (2003b) Deceived: Under target online. Comm. ACM 46(12):196–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grazioli S, Wang A (2001) Looking without seeing: Understanding unsophisticated consumers’ success and failure to detect Internet deception. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, New Orleans), 193–203.Google Scholar
• Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Haubl G, Murray K (2003) Preference construction and persistence in digital marketplaces: The role of electronic recommendation agents. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1–2):75–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haubl G, Murray KB (2006) Double agents: Assessing the role of electronic product-recommendation systems. Sloan Management Rev. 47(3):8–12.Google Scholar
• Haubl G, Trifts V (2000) Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. 19(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Hill DJ, King MF, Cohen E (1996) The perceived utility of information presented via electronic decision aids: A consumer perspective. J. Consumer Policy 19(2):137–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson PE, Grazioli S, Jamal K (1993) Fraud detection: Intentionality and deception in cognition. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 18(5):467–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson PE, Grazioli S, Jamal K, Berryman RG (2001) Detecting deception: Adversarial problem solving in a low base-rate world. Cognitive Sci. 25(3):355–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnston AC, Warkentin M (2010) Fear appeals and information security behaviors: An empirical study. MIS Quart. 34(3):549–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley CA, Gaidis WC, Reingen PH (1989) The use of vivid stimuli to enhance comprehension of the content of product warning messages. J. Consumer Affairs 23(2):243–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim R (2011) Why eBay is buying recommendation engine Hunch. Gigaom (November 21), https://gigaom.com/2011/11/21/why-ebay-is-buying-recommendation-engine-hunch/.Google Scholar
• King MF, Hill DJ (1994) Electronic decision aids: Integration of a consumer perspective. J. Consumer Policy 17(2):181–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komiak SY, Benbasat I (2008) A two-process view of trust and distrust building in recommendation agents: A process-tracing study. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(12):727–747.Google Scholar
• Levin IP, Gaeth GJ, Schreiber J (2002) A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 88(1):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ (1998) All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(2):149–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Limelight Networks (2010) Limelight Networks research identifies online commerce website features that create brand loyalty. (November 3), http://investors.limelightnetworks.com/press-release/limelight-networks-research-identifies-online-commerce-website-features-create-brand-l.Google Scholar
• Marett K, George JF (2005) Group deception in computer-supported environments. Proc. 38th Ann. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci (IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, HI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S (1987) The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(3):500–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. 63(2):81–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller GR, Stiff JB (1993) Deceptive Communication (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Robinson SL (1997) When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Acad. Management Rev. 22(1):226–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulpuru S (2013) Must-have ecommerce features. Forrester (January 29), http://www.targetmarketingmag.com/promo/MustHaveeCommerceFeatures.pdf.Google Scholar
• Murph D (2013) Amazon acquires Goodreads, aims to make better recommendations for Kindle users. Engadget (March 28), http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/28/amazon-acquires-goodreads-kindle-recommendation-engine/.Google Scholar
• O’Keefe DJ, Jensen JD (2009) The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. J. Comm. 59(2):296–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parasuraman R (1984) Sustained attention in detection and discrimination. Parasuraman R, Davies DR, eds. Varieties of Attention (Academic Press, London), 243–266.Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2014) Internet user demographics. Accessed October 19, 2014, http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/.Google Scholar
• Punj G, Moore R (2009) Information search and consideration set formation in a web-based store environment. J. Bus. Res. 62(6):644–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson SL (1996) Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):574–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross K (1981) Legal and practical considerations for the creation of warning labels and instruction books. J. Products Liability 4(1):29–45.Google Scholar
• Rothman AJ, Salovey P (1997) Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psych. Bull. 121(1):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothman AJ, Bartels RD, Wlaschin J, Salovey P (2006) The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practices. J. Comm. 56(S1):S202–S220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothman AJ, Salovey P, Antone C, Keough K, Martin CD (1993) The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 29(5):408–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandler Research (2015) Opportunities for online shopping in different countries. Accessed October 19, 2015, http://www.sandlerresearch.org/industry-views/opportunities-for-online-shopping-in-different-countries.Google Scholar
• Scott ED (2006) Just(?) a true-false test: Applying signal detection theory to judgments of organizational dishonesty. Bus. Soc. 45(2):130–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senecal S (2003) Essays on the influence of online relevant others on consumers’ online product choices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Montreal, Montreal.Google Scholar
• Senecal S, Nantel J (2004) The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. J. Retailing 80(2):159–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Martin IM (1994) Intended and unintended consequences of warning messages: A review and synthesis of empirical research. J. Public Policy Marketing 13(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiff JB, Kim HJ, Ramesh CN (1992) Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Comm. Res. 19(3):326–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan M (2014) Apple has acquired BookLamp and its book recommendation engine. VentureBeat (July 26), http://venturebeat.com/2014/07/26/apple-has-acquired-booklamp-and-its-book-recommendation-engine/.Google Scholar
• Tilley PA (2005) Training, warning, and media richness effects on computer-mediated deception and its detection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Benbasat I (2005) Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 6(3):72–101.Google Scholar
• Wickens TD (2001) Elementary Signal Detection Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wise J (2010) Top ten secrets of effective liars. Psychology Today (May 3), http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/extreme-fear/201005/top-ten-secrets-effective-liars.Google Scholar
• Witte K, Allen M (2000) A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Ed. Behav. 27(5):591–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao B (2010) Product-related deceptive information practices in B2C e-commerce: Formation, outcomes, and detection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Benbasat I (2007) E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quart. 31(1):137–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Benbasat I (2011) Product-related deception in e-commerce: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 35(1):169–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Benbasat I (2014) Research on use, characteristics, and impact of e-commerce product recommendation agents: A review and update for 2007–2012. Martínez-López FJ, ed. Research Handbook on e-Business Strategic Management, Vol. 3 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 403–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Benbasat I (2015) Consumer vulnerability to biased product recommendations in online buying: The influence of perceived personalization. Working paper, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu.Google Scholar
• Xu J, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT (2014) The influences of online service technologies and task complexity on efficiency and personalization. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):420–436.Link, Google Scholar