Editorial—Evolvable Systems: Through the Looking Glass of IS

References

• Agarwal R, Dhar V (2014) Big data, data science, and analytics: The opportunity and challenge for IS research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):443–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2002) Principles and models for organizing the IT function. MIS Quart. Executive 1(1):1–16.Google Scholar
• Andreessen M (2011) Why software is eating the world. Wall Street J. (August 20). Accessed August 19, 2015, http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111903480904576512250915629460.Google Scholar
• Barnett W (2008) The Red Queen Among Organizations: How Competitiveness Evolves (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breselor S (2015) Why 40-year-old tech is still running America’s air traffic control. Wired. Accessed August 14, 2015, http://wired.com/2015/02/air-traffic-control.Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T, Greenstein S (2014) Mobile computing: The next platform rivalry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):475–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll L (1917 reprint) Through the Looking Glass (Rand McNally and Co., Chicago).Google Scholar
• D’Aveni R, Dagnino G, Smith K (2010) The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1371–1385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Weck O, Roos D, Magee C (2011) Engineering Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Tabrizi B (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computing industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R (2004) Real options and IT platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice. Inform. Systems Res. 15(2):132–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Gamba A, Fusari N (2009) Valuing modularity as a real option. Management Sci. 55(11):1877–1896.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lawrence P, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Intel (2015) Internet of things. Accessed August 12, 2015, http://intel.com/content/www/us/en/internet-of-things/infographics/guide-to-iot.html.Google Scholar
• Lawrence P, Lorsch J (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MIT Technology Review (2015) Rebooting the automobile. MIT Tech. Rev. (July/August):54. Accessed August 19, 2015, http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/538466/rebooting-the-automobile.Google Scholar
• Nelson R (1995) Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J. Econom. Literature 33(1):48–90.Google Scholar
• Ouchi W (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Palahniuk C (2005) Fight Club: A Novel (WW Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• Parnas D (1972) On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Comm. ACM 15(9):1053–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Press G (2014) Internet of things by the numbers: Market estimates and forecasts. Forbes (August 22). Accessed August 12, 2015, http://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2014/08/22/internet-of-things-by-the-numbers-market-estimates-and-forecasts/.Google Scholar
• Simon H (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Simon H, Ando A (1961) Aggregation of variables in dynamic systems. Econometrica 29(2):111–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stenseth N, Smith J (1984) Coevolution in ecosystems: Red queen evolution or stasis. Evolution 38(4):870–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramanyam R, Ramasubbu N, Krishnan M (2012) In search of efficient flexibility: Effects of software component granularity on development effort, defects, and customization effort. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):787–803.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2014) Platform Ecosystems (Morgan Kauffmann, Waltham, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Kim S (2015) Discriminating IT governance. Inform. Systems Res. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush A (2010) Platform evolution: Coevolution of architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar