Research Note—Can’t Buy Me Love…Or Can I? Social Capital Attainment Through Conspicuous Consumption in Virtual Environments

References

• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005) Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Sci. 51(10):1449–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Bagwell LS, Bernheim BD (1996) Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):349–373.Google Scholar
• Bainbridge W (2007) The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science 317(5837):472–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.Link, Google Scholar
• Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM, Werning I (2005) The equilibrium distribution of income and the market for status. J. Political Econom. 113(2):282–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beggan JK (1992) On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 62(2):229–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belk RW (1988) Possessions and the extended self. J. Consumer Res. 15(2):139–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Rosenholtz SJ, Zelditch M (1980) Status organizing processes. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 6:479–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Zelditch M, Anderson B, Cohen BP (1972) Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. Berger J, Zelditch M, Anderson B, eds. Sociological Theories in Process, 2nd ed. (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston), 119–146.Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to clique identification. J. Math. Sociol. 2(1):113–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun OL, Wicklund RA (1989) Psychological antecedents of conspicuous consumption. J. Econom. Psych. 10(3):161–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell KE, Marsden PV, Hurlbert JS (1986) Social resources and socioeconomic status. Soc. Networks 8(1):97–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:95–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corneo G, Jeanne O (1997) Conspicuous consumption, snobbism and conformism. J. Public Econom. 66(1):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Aveni RA, Kesner I (1993) Top managerial prestige, power and tender offer response: A study of elite social networks and target firm cooperation during takeovers. Organ. Sci. 4(2):123–151.Link, Google Scholar
• Drèze X, Nunes JC (2009) Feeling superior: The impact of loyalty program structure on consumers’ perceptions of status. J. Consumer Res. 35(6):890–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Froelich M (2004) Finite-sample properties of propensity-score matching and weighting estimators. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(1):77–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fromm E (1976) To Have or to Be (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griskevicius V, Kenrick DT (2013) Fundamental motives for why we buy: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 23(3):372–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Shapiro C (1988) Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Quart. J. Econom. 103(1):79–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Gil-White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution Human Behav. 22(3):165–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinz O, Spann M (2008) The impact of information diffusion on bidding behavior in secret reserve price auctions. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):351–368.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinz O, Spann M, Hann I-H (2010) Prestige goods and social status in virtual worlds. 31st Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, St. Louis. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/190/.Google Scholar
• Hinz O, Skiera B, Barrot C, Becker J (2011) Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. J. Marketing 75(6):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Frei FX (2002) Do better customers utilize electronic distribution channels? The case of PC banking. Management Sci. 48(6):732–748.Link, Google Scholar
• Laumann EO, Marsden PV, Prensky D (1989) The boundary specification problem in network analysis. Freeman LC, White DR, Rommey AK, eds. Research Methods in Social Network Analysis (George Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA), 18–34.Google Scholar
• Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabasi A, Brewer D, Christakis Net al. (2009) Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science 323(5915):721–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehdonvirta V (2009) Virtual item sales as a revenue model: Identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions. Electronic Commerce Res. 9(1–2):97–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin N (1982) Social resources and instrumental action. Marsden PV, Lin N, eds. Social Structure and Network Analysis (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 131–145.Google Scholar
• Lin N (1999a) Social networks and status attainment. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 25:467–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin N (1999b) Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22(1):28–51.Google Scholar
• Linton R (1936) The Study of Man (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York).Google Scholar
• Mason R (2000) Conspicuous consumption and the positional economy: Policy and prescription since 1970. Managerial Decision Econom. 21(3–4):123–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMillan J, Woodruff C (1999) Interfirm relationships and informal credit in Vietnam. Quart. J. Econom. 114(4):1285–1320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller G (2000) The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G, Sundararajan A (2012) The visible hand? Demand effects of recommendation networks in electronic markets. Management Sci. 58(11):1963–1981.Link, Google Scholar
• Portes A (1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 24:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putzke J, Fischbach K, Schoder D, Gloor PA (2010) The evolution of interaction networks in massively multiplayer online games. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(2):69–94.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rucker DD, Galinsky AD (2009) Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(3):549–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt P, Skiera B, Van den Bulte C (2011) Referral programs and customer value. J. Marketing 75(1):46–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sivanathan N, Pettit NC (2010) Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(3):564–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sulake (2012) Habbo. Sulake Corporation. Accessed March 21, 2014, http://www.sulake.com/habbo.Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C (2010) Opportunities and challenges in studying consumer networks. Wuyts S, Dekimpe MG, Gijsbrechts E, Pieters R, eds. The Connected Customer (Routledge, London), 7–35.Google Scholar
• Veblen T (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class (Macmillan Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection–a selection for a handicap. J. Theoret. Biology 53(1):205–214.Crossref, Google Scholar