Versioning in the Software Industry: Heterogeneous Disutility from Underprovisioning of Functionality

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0597

References

  • Anderson ET, Dana JD Jr (2009) When is price discrimination profitable. Management Sci. 55(6):980–989.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Belleflamme P, Gordon W, Watt R (2003) Pricing information goods in the presence of copying. Gordon W, Watt R, eds. The Economics of Copyright: Developments in Research and Analysis (Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, UK), 26–54.Google Scholar
  • Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2001) Information goods and vertical differentiation. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(2):89–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2004) Economics of an information intermediary with aggregation benefits. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):22–36.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2008) Research note—when is versioning optimal for information goods? Management Sci. 54(5):1029–1035.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chellappa RK, Mehra A (2011) Versioning 2.0: A product line and pricing model for information goods under usage constraints and with R&D costs. Working paper, Theory of Economics of Information Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV. http://www.teis-workshop.org/papers/Versioning_Chellappa_Mehra.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Chellappa RK, Shivendu S (2003) Economic implication of variable technology standards for movie piracy in a global context. J. Management Inform. Systems 20(2):137–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chellappa RK, Shivendu S (2005) Managing piracy: Pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets. Inform. Systems Res. 16(4):400–417.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chellappa RK, Shivendu S (2010) Mechanism design for “free” but “no free disposal” services: The economics of personalization under privacy concerns. Management Sci. 56(10):1766–1780.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Seshadri S (2007) Product development and pricing strategy for information goods under heterogeneous outside opportunities. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):150–172.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng HK, Tang QC (2010) Free trial or no free trial: Optimal software product design with network effects. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 205(2):437–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R (1984) On allocative distortions in problems of self-selection. RAND J. Econom. 15(4):568–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cusumano M, Selby R (1997) How Microsoft builds software. Comm. ACM 40(6):53–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dey D, Lahiri A (2013) The zero-day DLC strategy: A case for versioning to facilitate product sampling. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle, http://teis-workshop.org/papers/2013/02_The_Zero-Day_DLC_Strategy.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Garvin DA (1984) What does “product quality” really mean? Sloan Management Rev. 26(1):25–43.Google Scholar
  • Gershoff AD, Kivetz R, Keinan A (2012) Consumer response to versioning: How brand’s production methods affect perceptions of unfairness. J. Consumer Res. 39(2):382–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Sundararajan A (2005) Software versioning and quality degradation? An exploratory study of the evidence. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Las Vegas, NV, 59–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1994) ISO 8402: Quality Management and Quality Assurance—Vocabulary, International Organization for Standardization, 2nd ed. (ISO, Geneva).Google Scholar
  • Jing B (2000) Versioning information goods with network externalities. Proc. 21st Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 1–12.Google Scholar
  • Jones R, Mendelson H (2011) Information goods vs. industrial goods: Cost structure and competition. Management Sci. 57(1):164–176.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kekre S, Krishnan MS, Srinivasan K (1995) Drivers of customer satisfaction for software products: Implications for design and service. Management Sci. 41(9):1456–1470.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kitchenham B, Pfleeger SL (1996) Software quality: The elusive target [special issues section]. Software, IEEE 13(1):12–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lahiri A, Dewan RM, Freimer M (2013) Pricing of wireless services: Service pricing vs. traffic pricing. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):418–435.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Methvin D (2009) Can an office suite be too powerful? InformationWeek (July 16), http://www.informationweek.com/windows/microsoft-news/can-an-office-suite-be-too-powerful/229205780.Google Scholar
  • Moorthy KS (1988) Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 7(2):141–168.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy KS, Png I (1992) Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. 38(3):345–359.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niculescu M, Wu DJ (2014) Economics of free under perpetual licensing: Implications for the software industry. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):173–199.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raghunathan S (2000) Software editions: An application of segmentation theory to the packaged software market. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(1):87–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salant SW (1989) When is inducing self-selection suboptimal for a monopolist. Quart. J. Econom. 104(2):391–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C (1983) Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quart. J. Econom. 98(4):659–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C, Varian H (1998) Versioning: The smart way to sell information. Harvard Bus. Rev. 107(6):106–114.Google Scholar
  • Sundararajan A (2004) Managing digital piracy: Pricing and protection. Inform. Systems Res. 15(3):287–308.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • The Software Alliance (2012) 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study, 9th ed. (Washington, DC), http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2011/downloads/study_pdf/2011_BSA_Piracy_Study-Standard.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Varian HR (1998) Versioning information goods. Hurley D, Kahin B, Varian HR, eds. Internet Publishing and Beyond (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 190–202.Google Scholar
  • Wei X, Nault BR (2008) Vertically differentiated information goods: Monopoly power through versioning. Working paper, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1677561.Google Scholar
  • Wei X, Nault BR (2013) Experience information goods: “Versions-to-upgrade”. Decision Support Systems 56:494–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wei X, Nault BR (2014) Monopoly versioning of information goods when consumers have group tastes. Production Oper. Management 23(6):1067–1081.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilde N, Scully MC (1995) Software reconnaissance: Mapping program features to code. J. Software Maintenance: Res. Practice 7(1):49–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu S, Chen P, Anandalingam G (2003) Fighting information goods piracy with versioning. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Seattle, 617–629.Google Scholar
  • Wu SY, Chen PY (2008) Versioning and piracy control for digital information goods. Oper. Res. 56(1):157–172.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.