What Motivates Contributors vs. Lurkers? An Investigation of Online Feedback Forums

References

• Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson MR (2010) Community psychology, political efficacy, and trust. Political Psych. 31(1):59–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. Amer. Psych. 44:1175–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (2012) On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. J. Management 38(1):9–44.Google Scholar
• Barber B (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Barkan SE (2004) Explaining public support for the environmental movement: A civic voluntarism model. Social Sci. Quart. 85(4):913–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bishop J (2007) Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human computer interaction. Comput. Human Behav. 23(4):1881–1893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bock G, Zmud R, Kim Y, Lee J (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quart. 29(1):87–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brady HE, Verba S, Schlozman KL (1995) Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 89(2):271–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryant SL, Forte A, Bruckman A (2005) Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. Proc. GROUP’05, Sanibel Island, FL (ACM, New York), 6–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli RT, Bassellier G (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quart. 33(4):689–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chadwick A (2009) Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: J. Law Policy Inform. Soc. 5(1):9–41.Google Scholar
• Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5):752–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW (2010) How to write up and report PLS analyses. Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H, eds. Handbook of Partial Least Squares (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 655–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clary E, Ridge R, Stukas A, Snyder M, Copeland J, Haugen J, Miene P (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(6):1516–1530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman S, Gøtze J (2001) Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation (Hansard Society, London).Google Scholar
• Connolly T, Thorn BK (1990) Discretionary databases: Theory, data and implications. Fulk J, Steinfield C, eds. Organizations and Communication Technology (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 219–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constant D, Kiesler S, Sproull L (1994) What’s mine is ours or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Inform. Systems Res. 5(4):400–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Craig SC, Niemi RG, Silver GE (1990) Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behav. 12(3):289–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlberg L (2001) The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Inform., Comm. Soc. 4(4):615–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeVellis RF (2003) Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Di Gangi PM, Wasko M (2009) Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems 48(1):303–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck JL, Lascher EL (2009) Direct democracy and political efficacy reconsidered. Political Behav. 31(3):401–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emergence Marketing (2010) Active lurkers—the hidden asset in online communities. http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2010/02/18/active-lurkers-the-hidden-asset-in-online-communities/.Google Scholar
• Erickson T, Herring SC (2005) Persistent conversation: A dialog between research and design. Proc. 38th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 4031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farzan R, DiMicco JM, Brownholtz B (2010) Mobilizing lurkers with a targeted task. Proc. 4th Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA), 235–238.Google Scholar
• Fulk J, Flanagin AJ, Kalman ME, Monge PR, Ryan T (1996) Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Comm. Theory 6(1):60–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garramone GM, Harris AC, Pizante G (1986) Predictors of motivation to use computer-mediated communication systems. J. Broadcasting Electronic Media 30(4):445–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Rigdon EE, Straub D (2011) An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quart. 35(2):A1–A7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh KY, Heng CS, Ling Z (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):88–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Granik S (2005) A reconceptualisation of the antecedents of party activism: A multidisciplinary approach. Political Stud. 53(3):598–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. A Global Perspective, 7th ed. (Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Herring SC (1996) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Kling R, ed. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices (Academic Press, San Diego), 476–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hrastinski S, Sjöström S, Lundström JE, Larsson AO, Ozan A (2011) Encouraging participation in an intra-organizational online idea community: A case study of a Swedish municipality. First Monday 16(10).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh JJP-A, Rai A, Keil M (2008) Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quart. 32(1):97–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Staples DS (2000) The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 9(2/3):129–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L, Frederiksen L (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1):45–63.Link, Google Scholar
• Joyce E, Kraut R (2006) Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. J. Comput.-Mediated Communication 11(3):723–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli A, Tan BCY, Wei KK (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 29(1):113–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly JW, Fisher D, Smith A (2006) Friends, foes, and fringe: Norms and structure in political discussion networks. Fortes JAB, Macintosh A, eds. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Digital Government Research (ACM, New York), 412–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Schlozman K, Nie N (2009) The Future of Political Science: 100 Perspectives (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivetz Y, Tyler TR (2007) Tomorrow I’ll be me: The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):193–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koehler CF, Breugelmans E, Dellaert BGC (2010) Consumer acceptance of recommendations by interactive decision aids: The joint role of temporal distance and concrete vs. abstract communications. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(4):231–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh J, Kim Y, Butler B, Bock G (2007) Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Comm. ACM 50(2):68–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kollock P, Smith M (1999) Communities in cyberspace. Smith MA, Kollock P, eds. Communities in Cyberspace (Routledge, London), 3–25.Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Benbasat I (2002) Para-social presence and communication capabilities of a Web site. e-Service J. 1(3):5–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Vragov R (2009) Active citizen participation through ICT tools. Comm. ACM 52(1):118–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lasswell HD (1948) Power and Personality (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Acad. Management J. 55(1):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libby LK, Eibach RP (2002) Looking back in time: Self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(2):167–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma M, Agarwal R (2007) Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. System Res. 18(1):42–67.Link, Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quart. 35(2):293–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A (2006) Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Sci. 52(12):1865–1883.Link, Google Scholar
• Marett K, Joshi KD (2009) The decision to share information and rumors: Examining the role of motivation in an online discussion forum. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(4):47–68.Google Scholar
• Markus ML (1990) Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media. Fulk J, Steinfield C, eds. Organizations and Communication Technology (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 194–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwell G, Oliver P (1993) The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mo PKH, Coulson NS (2010) Empowering processes in online support groups among people living with HIV/AIDS: A comparative analysis of “lurkers” and “posters.” Comput. Human Behav. 26(5):1183–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge P, Fulk J, Kalman M, Flanagin A, Parnassa C, Rumsey S (1998) Production of collective action in alliance-based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organ. Sci. 9(3):411–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Niemi RG, Craig SC, Mattei F (1991) Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 85(4):1407–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonnecke B, Andrews D, Preece J (2006) Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Res. 6(1):7–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nov O, Naaman M, Ye C (2009) Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 61(3):555–566.Google Scholar
• Olphert W, Damodaran L (2007) Citizen participation and engagement in the design of e-government services: The missing link in effective ICT design and delivery. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(9):491–507.Google Scholar
• Oppenheim A (1966) Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement (Heinemann, London).Google Scholar
• Pattie C, Seyd P, Whiteley P (2003) Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behavior in Britain. Political Stud. 51(3):443–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulini M, Maher ML, Murty P (2014) Motivating participation in online innovation communities. Internat. J. Web-Based Communities 10(1):94–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Gefen D (2005) Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Inform. Systems Res. 16(4):372–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. 31(1):105–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peddibhotla N, Subramani M (2007) Contributing to public document repositories: A critical mass theory perspective. Organ. Stud. 28(3):327–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub DW, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phang CW, Kankanhalli A (2008) A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives. Comm. ACM 51(12):128–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phang CW, Kankanhalli A, Huang LH (2014) Drivers of quantity and quality of participation in online policy deliberation forums. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(3):172–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phang CW, Kankanhalli A, Sabherwal R (2009) Usability and sociability in electronic communities: A comparative study of knowledge seekers and contributors. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(10):721–747.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. App. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preece J, Nonnecke B, Andrews D (2004) The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Comput. Human Behav. 20(2):201–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pronin E, Olivola CY, Kennedy KA (2008) Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(2):224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam RD (1993) Making Democracy Work (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Qureshi I, Compeau D (2009) Assessing between groups differences in IS research: A comparison of covariance and component based SEM. MIS Quart. 33(1):199–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rickert A, Sacharow A (2000) It’s a woman’s World Wide Web. Media Metrix and Jupiter Communications. http://www.mediametrix.com/data/MMXI-JUP-WWWW.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ridings C, Wasko MM (2010) Online discussion group sustainability: Investigating the interplay between structural dynamics and social dynamics over time. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(2):95–120.Google Scholar
• Ridings C, Gefen D, Arinze B (2006) Psychological barriers: Lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18:329–354.Google Scholar
• Ridings CM, Gefen D, Arinze B (2002) Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 11(3–4):271–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts J, Hann IH, Slaughter S (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. 52(7):984–999.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenstone S, Hansen J (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and American Democracy (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Rubenson D (2000) Participation and politics: Social capital, civic voluntarism, and institutional context. Political Stud. Assoc. UK 50th Annual Conf. (Political Studies Association, London),10–13.Google Scholar
• Ryfe DM (2005) Does deliberative democracy work? Annual Rev. Political Sci. 8:49–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econom. Statist. 36(4):387–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schifter DE, Ajzen I (1985) Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 49(3):843–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlozman KL, Burns N, Verba S (1994) Gender and the pathways to participation: The role of resources. J. Politics 56(4):963–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seyd P, Whiteley P (2002) New Labor’s Grass Roots: The Transformation of the Labor Party Membership (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seyd P, Whiteley P, Pattie C (2001) Citizenship in Britain: Attitudes and behavior. Political Quart. 72(s1):141–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah DV, Cho J Jr, Eveland WP, Kwak N (2005) Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Comm. Res. 32(5):531–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah DV, Cho J, Nah S, Gotlieb MR, Hwang H, Lee NJ, Scholl RM, McLeod DM (2007) Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. J. Comm. 57(4):676–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shani Y, Igou ER, Zeelenberg M (2009) Different ways of looking at unpleasant truths: How construal levels influence information search. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 110(1):36–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen CC, Chiou JS (2009) The impact of perceived ease of use on Internet service adoption: The moderating effects of temporal distance and perceived risk. Comput. Human Behav. 26(1):42–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sills S, Song C (2002) Innovations in survey research: An application of Web-based surveys. Social Sci. Comput. Rev. 20(1):22–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snow DA, Rochford EB, Worden SK, Benford RD (1986) Frame alignment processes, micro-mobilization, and movement participation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(4):464–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley J, Wichowski A (2011) Political discussion online. Consalvo M, Ess C, eds. The Handbook of Internet Studies (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 168–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sturmer S, Simon B (2004) Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 15(1):59–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. 6(2):144–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Teo HH, Chan HC, Wei KK, Zhang Z (2003) Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 59(5):671–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Theiss-Morse E, Hibbing JR (2005) Citizenship and civic engagement. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 8:227–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110(3):403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 17(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N, Wakslak C (2007) Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 17(2):83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turetzky P (1998) Time (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Ang S, Botero IC (2003) Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1359–1392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vedel T (2006) The idea of electronic democracy: Origins, visions and questions. Parliamentary Affairs 59(2):226–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and I into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. 11(4):342–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG (2000) Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart. 24(1):115–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verba S, Nie N (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Verba S, Schlozman K, Brady H (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko M, Faraj S (2000) It is what one does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 9(2):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko M, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whiteley P (1995) Rational choice and political participation, evaluating the debate. Political Res. Quart. 48:211–234.Google Scholar
• Wiertz C, de Ruyter K (2007) Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organ. Stud. 28(3):347–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Fulk J, Monge PR (2007) Access to information in connective and communal transactive memory systems. Comm. Res. 34(2):131–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang P (2008) Motivational affordances: Fundamental reasons for ICT design and use. Comm. ACM 51(11):145–147.Crossref, Google Scholar