Research Commentary—Informing Privacy Research Through Information Systems, Psychology, and Behavioral Economics: Thinking Outside the “APCO” Box

References

• Acquisti A (2004) Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification. Proc. 5th ACM Electronic Commerce Conf. (ACM, New York), 21–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Grossklags J (2005) Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security Privacy 3(1):26–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, John L, Loewenstein G (2012) The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):160–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Curley SP, Zhang J (2013) Do recommender systems manipulate consumer preferences? A study of anchoring effects. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):856–875.Link, Google Scholar
• Angst CM, Agarwal R (2009) Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quart. 33(2):339–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D (2008) Predictably Irrational (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Ariely D (2009) The end of rational economics. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(7/8):78–84.Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G (2006) The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making 19(2):87–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Huber J, Wertenbroch K (2005) When do losses loom larger than gains? J. Marketing Res. 42(2):134–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2003) Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):73–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2006) Tom Sawyer and the construction of value. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal G, Zahedi F, Gefen D (2008) The moderating influence of privacy concern on the efficacy of privacy assurance mechanisms for building trust: A multiple-context investigation. Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Paris.Google Scholar
• Baron RS, Inman M, Kao C, Logan H (1992) Negative emotion and superficial social processing. Motivation Emotion 16(4):323–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, Crossler RE (2011) Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quart. 35(4):1017–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bem DJ (1967) Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psych. Rev. 74(3):183–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen GV, Mussweiler T, Gabriel S, Moreno KN (2001) Affective Influences on Stereotyping and Intergroup Relations (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2013) Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):340–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briñol P, Petty RE (2012) The History of Attitudes and Persuasion Research (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (1982) The need for cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 42(1):116–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Kao CF, Rodrigues R (1986) Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(5):1032–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S (1978) The use of source versus message cues in persuasion: An information processing analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst.Google Scholar
• Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5):752–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (2009) Influence: Science and Practice (Pearson Education, Boston).Google Scholar
• Compeau D, Marcolin B, Kelley H, Higgins C (2012) Research commentary—Generalizability of information systems using student subjects—A reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1093–1109.Link, Google Scholar
• Consumers Union (2008) Poll: Consumers concerned about Internet privacy. (September 25), http://consumersunion.org/news/poll-consumers-concerned-about-internet-privacy/.Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Robert LP, Curtis AM, Kowalczyk ST, Hasty BK (2012) Research note—Trust is in the eye of the beholder: A vignette study of postevent behavioral controls’ effects on individual trust in virtual teams. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):61–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton DG, Aron AP (1974) Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30(4):510–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eastlick MA, Lotz SL, Warrington P (2006) Understanding online B-to-C relationships: An integrated model of privacy concerns, trust, and commitment. J. Bus. Res. 59(8):877–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Equifax (1995) Equifax-Harris Mid-decade Consumer Privacy Survey 1995 (Equifax, New York).Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Qureshi I, Sun H, McCole P, Ramsey E, Lim KH (2014) Trust, satisfaction, and online repurchase intention: The moderating role of perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms. MIS Quart. 38(2):407–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Lake VKB (2008) If you need help, just ask: Underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(1):128–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Pavlou PA (2012) The boundaries of trust and risk: The quadratic moderating role of institutional structures. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):940–959.Link, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Wyss S, Lichtenstein Y (2008) Business familiarity as risk mitigation in software development outsourcing contracts. MIS Quart. 32(3):531–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert D (1991) How mental systems believe. Amer. Psychologist 46(2):107–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Imas A (2014) Materazzi effect and the strategic use of anger in competitive interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(4):1334–1337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Imas A, Madarász K (2014) Conscience accounting: Emotion dynamics and social behavior. Management Sci. 60(11):2645–2658.Link, Google Scholar
• Goes PB (2013) Information systems research and behavioral economics. MIS Quart. 37(3):iii–viii.Google Scholar
• Grice P (1975) Logic and Conversation (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Grossklags J, Acquisti A (2007) When 25 cents is too much: An experiment on willingness-to-sell and willingness-to-protect personal information. Proc. 6th Workshop Econom. Inform. Security, Pittsburgh. http://weis07.infosecon.net/papers/66.pdf.Google Scholar
• Harris Interactive (2011) Mobile privacy: A user’s perspective. Accessed July 30, 2012, http://www.truste.com/why_TRUSTe_privacy_services/harris-mobile-survey/.Google Scholar
• Hong W, Thong JYL (2013) Internet privacy concerns: An integrated conceptualization and four empirical studies. MIS Quart. 37(1):275–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoorens V, Buunk BP (1993) Social comparison of health risks: Locus of control, the person-positivity bias, and unrealistic optimism. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 23(4):291–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2010) Research commentary—Vigilant interaction in knowledge collaboration: Challenges of online user participation under ambivalence. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):773–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Shaw TR, Staples DS (2004) Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Inform. Systems Res. 15(3):250–267.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaswal VK, Croft AC, Setia AR, Cole CA (2010) Young children have a specific, highly robust bias to trust testimony. Psych. Sci. 21(10):1541–1547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2011) Strangers on a plane: Context-dependent willingness to divulge sensitive information. J. Consumer Res. 37(5):858–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnston AC, Warkentin M (2010) Fear appeals and information security behaviors: An empirical study. MIS Quart. 34(3):549–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Frederick S (2002) Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch KL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee L, Amir O, Ariely D (2009) In search of homo economicus: Cognitive noise and the role of emotion in preference consistency. J. Consumer Res. 36(2):173–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehrer J (2009) How We Decide (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York).Google Scholar
• Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ (1998) All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(2):149–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Sarathy R, Xu H (2011b) The role of affect and cognition on the online consumers’ decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors. Decision Support Systems 51(3):434–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Sarathy R, Zhang J (2008) The role of emotions in shaping consumers’ privacy beliefs about unfamiliar online vendors. J. Inform. Privacy Security 4(3):36–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y (2011) Empirical studies on online information privacy concerns: Literature review and an integrative framework. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 28(1):453–496.Google Scholar
• Li Y, Johnson E, Zaval L (2011a) Local warming: Daily temperature change influences belief in global warming. Psych. Sci. 22(4):454–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Xue Y (2009) Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 33(1):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim ET, Tan C-W, Cyr D, Pan SL, Xiao B (2012) Advancing public trust relationships in electronic government: The Singapore e-filing journey. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1110–1130.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu BQ, Goodhue DL (2012) Two worlds of trust for potential e-commerce users: Humans as cognitive misers. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1246–1262.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G (1996) Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 65(3):272–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowry PJ, Moody GD, Vance A, Jensen M, Jenkins JL, Wells T (2012) Using an elaboration likelihood approach to better understand the persuasiveness of website privacy assurance cues for online consumers. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 63(4):755–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McConnell AR, Leibold JM (2001) Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 37(6):435–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McConnell AR, Rydell RJ (2014) The Systems of Evaluation Model: A Dual-Systems Approach to Attitudes (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• McConnell AR, Rydell RJ, Strain LM, Mackie DM (2008) Forming implicit and explicit attitudes toward individuals: Social group association cues. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(5):792–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metzger MJ (2004) Privacy, trust, and disclosure: Exploring barriers to electronic commerce. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 9(4).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möllering G (2006) Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity (Elsevier, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newport F (2001) The fascinating “local versus national” phenomenon. Gallup (February 9), http://www.gallup.com/poll/4660/fascinating-local-versus-national-phenomenon.aspx.Google Scholar
• Nicolaou AI, McKnight DH (2006) Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):332–351.Link, Google Scholar
• Novemsky N, Kahneman D (2005) The boundaries of loss aversion. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):119–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ou CX, Pavlou PA, Davison RM (2014) Swift guanxi in online marketplaces: The role of computer-mediated communication technologies. MIS Quart. 38(1):209–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özpolat K, Gao G, Jank K, Viswanathan S (2013) Research note—The value of third-party assurance seals in online retailing: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1100–1111.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA (2011) State of the information privacy literature: Where are we now and where should we go? MIS Quart. 35(4):977–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1981) Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches (William C. Brown, Dubuque, IA).Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19 (Elsevier, New York), 123–203.Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Wegener DT (1998) Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Piccoli G, Ives B (2003) Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quart. 27(3):365–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2012) Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new systems acceptance. MIS Quart. 36(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2013) The embeddedness of information systems habits in organizational and individual level routines: Development and disruption. MIS Quart. 37(1):221–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt TC, Cullen FT (2000) The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology 38(3):931–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Res. 42(1):185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priester JR, Petty RE (1995) Source attribution and persuasion: Perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(6):637–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice SC (2012) Reputation and uncertainty in online markets: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):436–452.Link, Google Scholar
• Riedl R, Hubert M, Kenning P (2010) Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of eBay offers. MIS Quart. 34(2):397–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Risen J, Critcher C (2011) Visceral fit: While in a visceral state, associated states of the world seem more likely. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 100(5):777–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson F, Schechner S, Mizroch A (2014) EU orders Google to let users erase past. Wall Street Journal (May 13), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303851804579559280623224964.Google Scholar
• Rogers RW (1983) Cognitive and Physiological Processes in Fear Appeals and Attitude Change: A Revised Theory of Protection Motivation (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rustagi S, King WR, Kirsch L (2008) Predictors of formal control usage in IT outsourcing partnerships. Inform. Systems Res. 19(2):126–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Schoenbachler DD, Gordon GL (2002) Trust and customer willingness to provide information in database-driven relationship marketing. J. Interactive Marketing 16(3):2–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Clore GL (2007) Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences (Guilford, New York).Google Scholar
• Sears D (1983) The person-positivity bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 44(2):233–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shampanier K, Mazar N, Ariely D (2007) How small is zero price? The true value of free products. Marketing Sci. 26(6):742–757.Link, Google Scholar
• Sharot T (2011) The Optimism Bias: A Tour of the Irrationally Positive Brain (Pantheon Books, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiv B, Fedorikhin A (1999) Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. J. Consumer Res. 26(3):278–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiv B, Loewenstein G, Bechata A, Damasio H, Damasio AR (2005) Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion. Psych. Sci. 16(6):435–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson S, Piquero N, Paternoster R (2002) Rationality and Corporate Offending Decisions (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Smith HJ (1993) Privacy policies and practices: Inside the organizational maze. Comm. ACM 36(12):105–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ (1994) Managing Privacy: Information Technology and Corporate America (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC).Google Scholar
• Smith HJ (2001) Information privacy and marketing: What the US should (and shouldn’t) learn from Europe. California Management Rev. 43(2):8–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xu H (2011) Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quart. 35(4):989–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Levin IP (1996) Need for cognition and choice framing effects. J. Behav. Decision Making 9(4):283–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel LA (1976) War on Privacy (Facts on File, New York).Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough JS (2008) Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Strack F, Schwarz N (1992) Communicative Influences in Standardized Question Situations: The Case of Implicit Collaboration (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Brown JD (1988) Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psych. Bull. 103(2):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experiment study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(1124):1128–1130.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wall Street Journal (2014) The morning risk report: EU ruling on Google is a “game changer,” attorney says. (May 14), http://blogs.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2014/05/14/the-morning-risk-report-eu-ruling-on-google-is-a-game-changer/.Google Scholar
• Westin AF (1967) Privacy and Freedom (Atheneum, New York).Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BC (2005) Predicting the adoption of location-based services: The roles of trust and privacy risk. Proc. 26th Ann. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Las Vegas, NV, 897–910.Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BCY, Agarwal R (2010) The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):137–176.Google Scholar
• Zhang P (2013) The affective response model: A theoretical framework of affective concepts and their relationships in the ICT context. MIS Quart. 37(1):247–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Buda R (1999) Moderating effects of need for cognition on responses to positively versus negatively framed advertising messages. J. Advertising 28(2):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar